scholarly journals Effects of Log Rolling Position on Hip Abductor Muscles Activity During Side-Lying Hip Abduction Exercise in Participants with Gluteus Medius Weakness

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-min Baik ◽  
Heon-seock Cynn ◽  
Jae-hun Shim ◽  
Ji-hyun Lee ◽  
A-reum Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Gluteus Maximus ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Neutral Position ◽  
Hip Abduction ◽  
Hip Abductor ◽  
Tensor Fasciae Latae

Abstract Context: Weakness of the gluteus medius and the gluteus maximus is associated with a variety of musculoskeletal disorders. However, activation of synergist muscles that are not targeted should be considered when prescribing side-lying hip abduction (SHA) exercises. Log-rolling positions may affect hip abductors activity during SHA. Objectives: To determine the effects of log-rolling positions on the gluteus medius, the gluteus maximus, and the tensor fasciae latae activity during SHA in participants with gluteus medius weakness. Design: The effects of different log-rolling positions on hip abductor activity during SHA were analyzed by one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Setting: University research laboratory. Participants: Twenty-one participants with gluteus medius weakness were recruited. Interventions: Three types of SHA were performed: SHA in the frontal plane with a neutral position (SHA-neutral), SHA in the frontal plane with an anterior log-rolling position (SHA-anterior rolling), and SHA in the frontal plane with a posterior log-rolling position (SHA-posterior rolling). Main Outcome Measures: Surface electromyography was used to measure the hip abductor activity. One-way repeated-measure analysis of variance was used to assess the statistical significance of the muscle activity. Results: SHA-anterior rolling showed significantly greater gluteus medius and gluteus maximus activation than SHA-neutral (P = .003 and P < .001, respectively) and SHA-posterior rolling (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). SHA-neutral showed significantly greater gluteus medius and gluteus maximus activation than SHA-posterior rolling (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively). SHA-anterior rolling showed significantly less tensor fasciae latae activation than SHA-neutral (P < .001) and SHA-posterior rolling (P < .001). SHA-neutral showed significantly less tensor fasciae latae activation than SHA-posterior rolling (P < .001). Conclusion: SHA-anterior rolling may be an effective exercise to increase activation of the gluteus medius and the gluteus maximus while decreasing the tensor fasciae latae in participants with gluteus medius weakness.

scholarly journals Effects of task and hip-abductor fatigue on lower limb alignment and muscle activation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Rabello ◽  
Camila Nodari ◽  
Felipe Scudiero ◽  
Iury Borges ◽  
Luan Fitarelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Limb Alignment ◽  
Lower Limb Alignment ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Hip Abduction ◽  
Hip Abductor

Abstract Purpose Fatigue-induced hip-abductor weakness may exacerbate lower-limb misalignments during different dynamic single-leg tasks. We sought to evaluate the effects of fatigue and task on lower limb kinematics and muscle activation and to find associations between measurements obtained in two tasks. Methods One-group pretest–posttest design. Seventeen healthy adults (9 W) performed the single-leg squat (SLSQUAT) and the single-leg hop (SLHOP) before and after a hip-abduction fatigue protocol. Hip adduction, knee frontal plane projection angle (knee FPPA) and heel inversion displacement were measured during the eccentric phase of the SLSQUAT and the SLHOP, as well as activation of the gluteus medius (GMed), tensor fascia latae (TFL), peroneus longus (PER) and tibialis anterior (TA). Moments and tasks were compared using a repeated-measures two-way ANOVA. Correlation between tasks was evaluated using Spearman’s correlation. Results No differences in kinematics or activation were found between moments. Hip-adduction displacement (P = 0.005), GMed (P = 0.008) and PER (P = 0.037) activation were higher during SLSQUAT, while TA activation was higher during SLHOP (P < 0.001). No differences were found between tasks in knee FPPA and heel inversion. Hip-adduction and knee FPPA were not correlated between tasks, while ankle inversion displacement was positively correlated (rs = 0.524–0.746). Conclusion Different characteristics of SLSQUAT (slower and deeper) seem to have led to increased hip adduction displacement, GMed, and PER activation and decreased TA activation, likely due to higher balance requirements. However, hip-abductor fatigue didn’t influence lower-limb alignment during the tasks. Finally, evaluations should be performed with different single-leg tasks since they don’t give the same lower-limb alignment information.

Effects of Different Hip Rotations on Gluteus Medius and Tensor Fasciae Latae Muscle Activity During Isometric Side-Lying Hip Abduction

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-hyun Lee ◽  
Heon-seock Cynn ◽  
Sil-ah Choi ◽  
Tae-lim Yoon ◽  
Hyo-jung Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Activity Ratio ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Repeated Measures Analysis ◽  
Hip Abduction ◽  
Tensor Fasciae Latae

Context:Gluteus medius (Gmed) weakness is associated with some lower-extremity injuries. People with Gmed weakness might compensate by activating the tensor fasciae latae (TFL). Different hip rotations in the transverse plane may affect Gmed and TFL muscle activity during isometric side-lying hip abduction (SHA).Objectives:To compare Gmed and TFL muscle activity and the Gmed:TFL muscle-activity ratio during SHA exercise with 3 different hip rotations.Design:The effects of different hip rotations on Gmed, TFL, and the Gmed:TFL muscle-activity ratio during isometric SHA were analyzed with 1-way, repeated-measures analysis of variance.Setting:University research laboratory.Participants:20 healthy university students were recruited in this study.Interventions:Participants performed isometric SHA: frontal SHA with neutral hip (frontal SHAN), frontal SHA with hip medial rotation (frontal SHA-MR), and frontal SHA with hip lateral rotation (frontal SHA-LR).Main Outcome Measures:Surface electromyography measured the activity of the Gmed and the TFL. A 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance assessed the statistical significance of Gmed and TFL muscle activity. When there was a significant difference, a Bonferroni adjustment was performed.Results:Frontal SHA-MR showed significantly greater Gmed muscle activation than frontal SHA-N (P = .000) or frontal SHA-LR (P = .015). Frontal SHA-LR showed significantly greater TFL muscle activation than frontal SHA-N (P = .002). Frontal SHA-MR also resulted in a significantly greater Gmed:TFL muscle-activity ratio than frontal SHA-N (P = .004) or frontal SHA-LR (P = .000), and frontal SHA-N was significantly greater than frontal SHA-LR (P = .000).Conclusions:Frontal SHA-MR results in greater Gmed muscle activation and a higher Gmed:TFL muscle ratio.

Effect of side-sling plank exercise on trunk and hip muscle activation in subjects with gluteus medius weakness

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Seung-Min Baik ◽  
Heon-Seock Cynn ◽  
Chung-Hwi Yi ◽  
Ji-Hyun Lee ◽  
Jung-Hoon Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Gluteus Maximus ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Erector Spinae ◽  
Lumbar Multifidus ◽  
Hip Muscle ◽  
Hip Abduction ◽  
Medial Rotation ◽  
Hip Muscles ◽  
Tensor Fasciae Latae

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of side-sling plank (SSP) exercises on trunk and hip muscle activation in subjects with gluteus medius (Gmed) weakness is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To quantify muscle activation of the rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), erector spinae (ES), lumbar multifidus (LM), Gmed, gluteus maximus (Gmax), and tensor fasciae latae (TFL) during SSP with three different hip rotations compared to side-lying hip abduction (SHA) exercise in subjects with Gmed weakness. METHODS: Twenty-two subjects with Gmed weakness were recruited. SHA and three types of SSP exercises were performed: SSP with neutral hip (SSP-N), hip lateral rotation (SSP-L), and hip medial rotation (SSP-M). Surface electromyography was used to measure the activation of the trunk and hip muscles. RESULTS: The trunk and hip muscles activations were generally significantly higher level during three SSP than SHA. SSP-M showed significantly lower EO activation while significantly higher ES and LM activation than SSP-L. Gmed activation was significantly higher during SSP-M than during SSP-L. TFL activation was significantly lower during SSP-M than during SSP-N and SSP-L. CONCLUSIONS: SSP could be prescribed for patients who have reduced Gmed strength after injuries. Especially, SSP-M could be applied for patients who have Gmed weakness with dominant TFL.

scholarly journals Hip Muscle Activity During 3 Side-Lying Hip-Strengthening Exercises in Distance Runners

2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. McBeth ◽  
Jennifer E. Earl-Boehm ◽  
Stephen C. Cobb ◽  
Wendy E. Huddleston
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Gluteus Maximus ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Electromyographic Activity ◽  
Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction ◽  
Strengthening Exercises ◽  
Hip Abduction ◽  
Hip Strengthening

Context: Lower extremity overuse injuries are associated with gluteus medius (GMed) weakness. Understanding the activation of muscles about the hip during strengthening exercises is important for rehabilitation. Objective: To compare the electromyographic activity produced by the gluteus medius (GMed), tensor fascia latae (TFL), anterior hip flexors (AHF), and gluteus maximus (GMax) during 3 hip-strengthening exercises: hip abduction (ABD), hip abduction with external rotation (ABD-ER), and clamshell (CLAM) exercises. Design: Controlled laboratory study. Setting: Laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Twenty healthy runners (9 men, 11 women; age = 25.45 ± 5.80 years, height = 1.71 ± 0.07 m, mass = 64.43 ± 7.75 kg) participated. Intervention(s): A weight equal to 5% body mass was affixed to the ankle for the ABD and ABD-ER exercises, and an equivalent load was affixed for the CLAM exercise. A pressure biofeedback unit was placed beneath the trunk to provide positional feedback. Main Outcome Measure(s): Surface electromyography (root mean square normalized to maximal voluntary isometric contraction) was recorded over the GMed, TFL, AHF, and GMax. Results: Three 1-way, repeated-measures analyses of variance indicated differences for muscle activity among the ABD (F3,57 = 25.903, P&lt;.001), ABD-ER (F3,57 = 10.458, P&lt;.001), and CLAM (F3,57 = 4.640, P=.006) exercises. For the ABD exercise, the GMed (70.1 ± 29.9%), TFL (54.3 ± 19.1%), and AHF (28.2 ± 21.5%) differed in muscle activity. The GMax (25.3 ± 24.6%) was less active than the GMed and TFL but was not different from the AHF. For the ABD-ER exercise, the TFL (70.9 ± 17.2%) was more active than the AHF (54.3 ± 24.8%), GMed (53.03 ± 28.4%), and GMax (31.7 ± 24.1 %). For the CLAM exercise, the AHF (54.2 ± 25.2%) was more active than the TFL (34.4 ± 20.1%) and GMed (32.6 ± 16.9%) but was not different from the GMax (34.2 ± 24.8%). Conclusions: The ABD exercise is preferred if targeted activation of the GMed is a goal. Activation of the other muscles in the ABD-ER and CLAM exercises exceeded that of GMed, which might indicate the exercises are less appropriate when the primary goal is the GMed activation and strengthening.

scholarly journals Hip-Abductor Fatigue and Single-Leg Landing Mechanics in Women Athletes

2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary F. Patrek ◽  
Thomas W. Kernozek ◽  
John D. Willson ◽  
Glenn A. Wright ◽  
Scott T. Doberstein
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Initial Contact ◽  
Fatigue Protocol ◽  
Landing Mechanics ◽  
Hip Abduction ◽  
Hip Abductor ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Context: Reduced hip-abductor strength and muscle activation may be associated with altered lower extremity mechanics, which are thought to increase the risk for anterior cruciate ligament injury. However, experimental evidence supporting this relationship is limited. Objective: To examine the changes in single-leg landing mechanics and gluteus medius recruitment that occur after a hip-abductor fatigue protocol. Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Patients or Other Participants: Twenty physically active women (age  =  21.0 ± 1.3 years). Intervention(s): Participants were tested before (prefatigue) and after (postfatigue) a hip-abductor fatigue protocol consisting of repetitive side-lying hip abduction. Main Outcome Measure(s): Outcome measures included sagittal-plane and frontal-plane hip and knee kinematics at initial contact and at 60 milliseconds after initial contact during 5 single-leg landings from a height of 40 cm. Peak hip and knee sagittal-plane and frontal-plane joint moments during this time interval were also analyzed. Measures of gluteus medius activation, including latency, peak amplitude, and integrated signal, were recorded. Results: A small (&lt;1°) increase in hip-abduction angle at initial contact and a small (&lt;1°) decrease in knee-abduction (valgus) angle at 60 milliseconds after contact were observed in the postfatigue landing condition. No other kinematic changes were noted for the knee or hip at initial contact or at 60 milliseconds after initial contact. Peak external knee-adduction moment decreased 27% and peak hip adduction moment decreased 24% during the postfatigue landing condition. Gluteus medius activation was delayed after the protocol, but no difference in peak or integrated signal was seen during the landing trials. Conclusions: Changes observed during single-leg landings after hip-abductor fatigue were not generally considered unfavorable to the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament. Further work may be justified to study the role of hip-abductor activation in protecting the knee during landing.

Relationship between muscular and bony anatomy in native hips: a theoretical background for approach-specific implant positioning

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doruk Akgün ◽  
Philipp von Roth ◽  
Tobias Winkler ◽  
Carsten Perka ◽  
Adam Trepczynski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gluteus Maximus ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Theoretical Background ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Acetabular Anteversion ◽  
Joint Orientation ◽  
Combined Anteversion ◽  
Bony Anatomy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tensor Fasciae Latae

Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between bony joint orientation and the distribution of hip musculature. Methods: The bone anatomy of the hip (femoral antetorsion (AT), acetabular anteversion (AV), and combined anteversion (AV/AT)) and the muscle volume of the gluteal muscles and the tensor fasciae latae were analysed bilaterally using computed tomography data of 49 patients. Muscle force direction (MFD) was determined for each muscle. The total MFD of the hip musculature was calculated and then correlated with the bony anatomy. Results: The mean AV, AT, and AV/AT were 21.9° ± 5.9°, 7.22° ± 7.4°, and 29.2° ± 9°, respectively. We found the following mean muscle volumes: gluteus maximus: 780 ± 227 cm3, gluteus medius: 322 ± 82 cm3, gluteus minimus: 85 ± 20 cm3, and tensor fasciae latae: 68 ± 22 cm3. The mean MFD was 18.92° ± 1.29°. We found a uniform distribution of the musculature that was not correlated with the bone anatomy. Conclusion: This study highlights the variability in native acetabular and femoral anatomy and that bone hip anatomy does not correlate with the distribution of hip musculature. Although native acetabular anteversion matches the suggested targets for cup insertion, native combined anteversion is not related to current implant insertion targets. Understanding native muscular anatomy and the alterations that occur with different surgical approaches can serve as an explanatory model for THAs that has become unstable despite the components being implanted within the safe zone.

Relationships between Knee Valgus, Hip-Muscle Strength, and Hip-Muscle Recruitment during a Single-Limb Step-Down

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Hollman ◽  
Barbara E. Ginos ◽  
Jakub Kozuchowski ◽  
Amanda S. Vaughn ◽  
David A. Krause ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Strength ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Gluteus Maximus ◽  
Knee Valgus ◽  
Outcome Measurements ◽  
Hip Muscle ◽  
Hip Abduction ◽  
Step Down ◽  
Rotation Strength

Context:Reduced strength and activation of hip muscles might correlate with increased weight-bearing knee valgus.Objective:To describe relationships among frontal-plane hip and knee angles, hip-muscle strength, and electromyographic (EMG) recruitment in women during a step-down.Design:Exploratory study.Setting:Laboratory.Participants:20 healthy women 20 to 30 years of age.Interventions:Frontal-plane hip and knee angles were measured. Gluteus maximus and medius recruitment were examined with surface EMG. Hip-abduction and -external-rotation strength were quantified with handheld dynamometry.Main Outcome Measurements:The authors analyzed correlation coefficients between knee and hip angles, gluteus maximus and medius EMG, and hip-abduction and -external-rotation strength.Results:Hip-adduction angles (r = .755, P = .001), gluteus maximus EMG (r = −.451, P = .026), and hip-abduction strength (r = .455, P = .022) correlated with frontal-plane projections of knee valgus.Conclusions:Gluteus maximus recruitment might have greater association with reduced knee valgus in women than does external-rotation strength during step-down tasks. Gluteus medius strength might be associated with increased knee valgus.

scholarly journals Hip-Muscle Activity in Men and Women During Resisted Side Stepping With Different Band Positions

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 1071-1081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara L. Lewis ◽  
Hanna D. Foley ◽  
Theresa S. Lee ◽  
Justin W. Berry
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Gluteus Maximus ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Lower Extremity Injury ◽  
Band Placement ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Trunk Inclination ◽  
Hip Muscle ◽  
Hip Abduction ◽  
Few Data

ContextWeakness or decreased activation of the hip abductors and external rotators has been associated with lower extremity injury, especially in females. Resisted side stepping is commonly used to address hip weakness. Whereas multiple variations of this exercise are used clinically, few data exist regarding which variations to select.ObjectiveTo investigate differences in muscle-activation and movement patterns and determine kinematic and limb-specific differences between men and women during resisted side stepping with 3 resistive-band positions.DesignControlled laboratory study.SettingLaboratory.Patients or Other ParticipantsA total of 22 healthy adults (11 men, 11 women; age = 22.8 ± 3.0 years, height = 171.6 ± 10.7 cm, mass = 68.5 ± 11.8 kg).Intervention(s)Participants side stepped with the resistive band at 3 locations (knees, ankles, feet).Main Outcome Measure(s)We collected surface electromyography of the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, and tensor fascia lata (TFL) for the moving and stance limbs during the concentric and eccentric phases. We also measured trunk inclination, hip and knee flexion, and hip-abduction excursion.ResultsHip-abductor activity was higher in women than in men (P ≤ .04). The pattern of TFL activity in the stance limb differed by sex. Women performed the exercise in greater forward trunk inclination (P = .009) and had greater hip excursion (P = .003). Gluteus maximus and medius activity increased when the band was moved from the knees to the ankles and from the ankles to the feet, whereas TFL activity increased only when the band was moved from the knees to the ankles. Findings were similar for both the stance and moving limbs, but the magnitudes of the changes differed.ConclusionsCompared with placing the band around the ankles, placing the band around the feet for resisted side stepping elicited more activity in the gluteal muscles without increasing TFL activity. This band placement is most appropriate when the therapeutic goal is to activate the muscles that resist hip adduction and internal rotation.

Hip Rotations’ Influence of Electromyographic Activity of Gluteus Medius Muscle During Pelvic-Drop Exercise

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renan Lima Monteiro ◽  
Joana Hoverter Facchini ◽  
Diego Galace de Freitas ◽  
Bianca Callegari ◽  
Sílvia Maria Amado João
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Random Order ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Neutral Position ◽  
Electromyographic Activity ◽  
Medial Rotation ◽  
Lateral Rotation ◽  
Tensor Fasciae Latae ◽  
Hip Rotation

Context:Pelvic-drop exercises are often used to strengthen the gluteus medius (GM) muscle with the aim of increasing or prioritizing its recruitment. However, the effect of hip rotation on the performance of the action of the GM is unknown.Objective:To evaluate the effect of hip rotation on the recruitment of the GM, tensor fasciae latae (TFL), and quadratus lumborum (QL).Method:Seventeen healthy subjects performed 2 sets of 4 repetitions of pelvic-drop exercise in random order with pelvic-drop lateral, medial, and neutral rotation of the hip.Main Outcome Measures:The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the GM, TFL, and QL was evaluated using surface electromyography.Results:There were significant increases in the activation of the GM with medial and neutral rotation compared with lateral rotation (P = .03, P = .01, respectively), and there was no difference between medial and neutral rotation (P = 1.00). There was no difference in EMG activity of the TFL and QL in any of the positions. The GM:TFL ratio was the same in all analyzed positions. Regarding the GM:QL ratio, there was a significant increase with medial rotation compared with lateral rotation (P = .02).Conclusions:Pelvic-drop exercises are more efficient for activating the GM when the hip is in medial rotation and neutral position.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document