scholarly journals Flipped Classroom in an Orthopaedic Assessment Course: Students' Perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana K. Bates
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Phenomenological Approach ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Physical Exam ◽  
Pedagogical Practice ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Group Interviews

Context:The flipped classroom, moving lecture outside class time and homework to the classroom, has been researched widely across many disciplines. Athletic training education has little research investigating this pedagogical approach.Objective:To explore students' perceptions of a flipped orthopaedic assessment course.Design:Qualitative study using a phenomenological approach.Setting:Focus group interviews with undergraduate students enrolled in an orthopaedic assessment course.Patients or Other Participants:Students (N = 15) enrolled in either the Physical Exam of the Lower Extremities in Athletic Training or the Physical Exam of the Upper Extremities in Athletic Training course participated in a focus-group interview in January or April 2016.Main Outcome Measure(s):Focus group interviews were conducted with a structured interview protocol. Interview data were analyzed inductively to uncover dominant themes by first organizing the data, then summarizing it into codes, and finally interpreting. Credibility was secured through member checking, triangulation, and investigator triangulation.Results:Themes indicated that participants in a flipped classroom found that this pedagogical practice was helpful, allowed for repetition, initially created more work, and was self-paced.Conclusions:Evidence demonstrated that the flipped classroom for this orthopaedic assessment course was favorably received by the participants.

scholarly journals Perceptions from Athletic Training Students Involved in an Intentional Peer-Assisted Learning Pedagogy

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana K. Bates
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Educational Experiences ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Peer Tutors ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Peer Assisted Learning ◽  
Peer Tutor ◽  
Group Interviews

Context: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) has been shown to benefit students across educational levels. Current research has investigated perceptions of PAL, postgraduate impact, as well as prevalence. This study investigated athletic training students' perceptions of an intentional PAL pedagogy on both the peer-student and peer-tutor. In this study, the peer-tutors had training prior to implementation. Objective: To explore athletic training students' perceptions of an intentional PAL pedagogy. Design: Qualitative study using a phenomenological approach. Setting: Focus group interviews with professional undergraduate athletic training students. Patients or Other Participants: Eleven athletic training students from 1 accredited athletic training program volunteered for this study. Five students (4 females, 1 male) serving as peer-tutors and 6 (5 females, 1 male) peer-students participated in focus group interviews in spring term 2015. The peer-tutors completed training prior to tutoring the peer-students. Main Outcome Measure(s): Focus group interviews were conducted with a structured interview protocol. The peer-student and peer-tutor groups were asked separate questions. Interview data were analyzed inductively to uncover dominant themes, first by organizing the data, then summarizing into codes, and finally interpreting. Credibility was secured through member checking, triangulation, and investigator triangulation. Results: Themes indicated that both peer-students and peer-tutors perceived that, through PAL, they collaborated, built relationships, gained confidence, were exposed to varied techniques, and the PAL pedagogy served as a way to review and practice, which changed their clinical educational experiences. Peer-tutors developed skills in leadership and teaching through their PAL experience. Conclusions: Evidence demonstrated that PAL created a learning environment in the student's clinical educational experiences that involved collaboration, relationships, confidence building, and more time for review and practice.

scholarly journals Value-sensitive clinical accompaniment in community nursing science

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonya Beukes ◽  
Anna G.W. Nolte ◽  
Ebin Arries
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Participant Observation ◽  
Value Systems ◽  
Community Nursing ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Nursing Science ◽  
Video Recordings ◽  
Contextual Design ◽  
Group Interviews

Clinical community health facilities where undergraduate students are placed for their practical work in community nursing science are dynamic and have undergone major transformation over the past few years. In the clinical field, community nurses and undergraduate students are representative of the different races and language and ethnic groups in the South African population, with each group espousing different value systems. Both parties – students and community nurses – report that, due to these differences, value conflicts are experienced during clinical accompaniment and that this has negative effects on clinical learning in community nursing science.The goal of this study was to explore and describe the experiences of students with regard to value-sensitive clinical accompaniment in the community nursing environment. An exploratory, descriptive and contextual design was used. Interactions between community nurses and students during clinical accompaniment were explored for value sensitivity by means of video recordings,participant observation and focus group interviews. Data were collected by means of video recordings, participant observation and focus group interviews. The data were analysed and coded by the researcher and the external coder, using an inductive descriptive method to identify important segments of the regularity of behaviour. The focus group interviews were transcribed, analysed and coded by the researcher and the external coder, using Tesch’s steps of analysis (Creswell 1994:155–156).Lincoln and Guba’s criteria (1985:290) for trustworthiness were applied to the study.The general findings indicate that clinical accompaniment in community nursing is not value sensitive and, as a result, guidelines for value-sensitive clinical accompaniment need to be developed for undergraduate students in the community nursing environment. The following values (values for which guidelines need to be developed) were identified: respect during clinical accompaniment,value-sensitive communication and sensitivity to the quality of clinical accompaniment.OpsommingKliniese gemeenskapsgesondheidsfasiliteite waar voorgraadse studente geplaas word vir gemeenskapsverpleegkundepraktika is dinamies en het groot veranderinge oor die laaste paar jare ondergaan. In die kliniese veld verteenwoordig gemeenskapsverpleegkundiges en voorgraadse studente verskillende rasse en taal- en etniese groepe in die Suid-Afrikaanse bevolking, elkeen met verskillende waardes. Albei partye – studente en gemeenskapsverpleegkundiges – het gerapporteer dat waardekonflik weens verskillende kulture en waardes tydens kliniese begeleiding ervaar word,wat kliniese leer op sy beurt in gemeenskapsverpleegkunde negatief beïnvloed.Die doel van die studie was om die belewenis van studente met betrekking tot waardesensitiewe kliniese begeleiding in gemeenskapsverpleegkunde te verken en te beskryf. ’n Verkennende, beskrywende en kontekstuele ontwerp is gebruik. Die interaksie wat tussen die gemeenskapsverpleegkundiges en studente tydens kliniese begeleiding plaasgevind het, is vir waardesensitiwiteit deur middel van video opnames, deelnemerobservasie en fokusgroeponderhoude verken. Die data wat deur middel van video-opnames en deelnemerobservasie ingesamel is, is deur die navorser en ’n eksterne kodeerder ontleed en gekodeer.’n Induktiewe beskrywende metode is gebruik om belangrike segmente van die gereeldheid van gedrag te identifiseer en beskryf. Fokusgroeponderhoude is deur die navorsers en ’n eksterne kodeerder getranskribeer, ontleed en gekodeer deur gebruik te maak van Tesch se stappe van analise (Creswell 1994:155–156). Lincoln en Guba (1985:290) se kriteria vir geloofwaardigheid is in die studie gebruik.Die algemene bevindinge dui daarop dat kliniese begeleiding in gemeenskapsverpleegkunde nie waarde-sensitief is nie. Gevolglik moet riglyne vir waarde-sensitiewe kliniese begeleiding vir voorgraadse studente in gemeenskapsverpleegkunde ontwikkel word. Die volgende waardes(waardes waarvoor riglyne ontwikkel moet word) is geïdentifiseer, naamlik respek tydens kliniese begeleiding, waarde-sensitiewe kommunikasie en sensitiwiteit vir gehalte van kliniese begeleiding.

scholarly journals Complementing or conflicting? How pharmacists and physicians position the community pharmacist

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 2078
Author(s):  
Hilde Rakvaag ◽  
Gunn E. Søreide ◽  
Eivind Meland ◽  
Reidun L. Kjome
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Community Pharmacists ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Positioning Theory ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Group Interviews

Background: Interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and physicians in primary care has been linked to improved patient outcomes. How professionals position themselves and each other can shed light upon their relationship, and positioning theory can be used as a tool to better understand intergroup relations. Objectives: 1) To identify how community pharmacists position themselves, and how they are positioned by general practitioners. 2) To assess how well these positions correspond, how the positions align with a proactive position for the pharmacists, and discuss how the positions could potentially impact collaboration. Methods: In this qualitative study, data were collected through six focus group interviews held between June and October 2019, three with pharmacists and three with physicians. The focus group interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. Data were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using the Systematic text condensation method. Positioning theory was used as a theoretical framework to identify the positions assigned to community pharmacists by the pharmacists themselves and by the physicians. Results: Twelve pharmacists and ten physicians participated. The pharmacists positioned themselves as the “last line of defense”, “bridge-builders”, “outsiders” – with responsibility, but with a lack of information and authority – and “practical problem solvers”. The physicians positioned pharmacists as “a useful checkpoint”, “non-clinicians” and “unknown”. Conclusions: The study revealed both commonalities and disagreements in how community pharmacists position themselves and are positioned by general practitioners. Few of the positions assigned to pharmacists by the physicians support an active role for the pharmacists, while the pharmacists´ positioning of themselves is more diverse. The physicians´ positioning of pharmacists as an unknown group represents a major challenge for collaboration. Increasing the two professions´ knowledge of each other may help produce new positions that are more coordinated, and thus more supportive towards collaboration.

scholarly journals Recently Certified Athletic Trainers' Undergraduate Educational Preparation in Psychosocial Intervention and Referral

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Lynn Stiller-Ostrowski ◽  
John A. Ostrowski
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Psychosocial Intervention ◽  
Athletic Trainers ◽  
Athletic Training Education ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
The United States ◽  
Content Area ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Group Interviews

Abstract Context: “Psychosocial Intervention and Referral” is one of the 12 content areas established by the National Athletic Trainers' Association Education Council and is required to be taught in athletic training education programs (ATEPs). The perceived preparation of athletic trainers (ATs) in this content area has not been evaluated. Objective: To explore the preparation level of recently certified ATs within the content area of “Psychosocial Intervention and Referral.” Design: Qualitative design involving semistructured, in-depth, focus group interviews. Setting: Interviews were conducted at 2 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I institutions in 2 regions of the United States. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 11 recently certified ATs who met predetermined criteria were recruited. The ATs represented a range of undergraduate ATEPs and current employment settings. Data Collection and Analysis: Focus group interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed deductively. Peer debriefing and member checks were used to ensure trustworthiness. Results: The ATEPs are doing an adequate job of preparing ATs for many common communication and interpersonal issues, but ATs report being underprepared to deal with athlete-related issues in the areas of motivation and adherence, counseling and social support, mental skills training, and psychosocial referral. Conclusions: Limitations of undergraduate ATEPs regarding preparation of athletic training students within the “Psychosocial Intervention and Referral” content area were identified, with the goal of improving athletic training education. The more we know about the issues that entry-level ATs face, the more effectively we can structure athletic training education.

scholarly journals Faculty and Preceptor Perceptions of Their Respective Roles in Athletic Training Student Development

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-218
Author(s):  
Julie M. Cavallario ◽  
Gary W. Cohen ◽  
Heather B. M. Wathen ◽  
Emily Lynn Nelson ◽  
Cailee E. Welch Bacon
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Student Development ◽  
Effective Communication ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Role Development ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
Group Interviews ◽  
Past Experiences

Context Health care professions use a unique learning pattern in which education occurs both didactically and clinically. Previous research has focused on preceptor selection and training, but there has been limited emphasis on the perceived roles of didactic and clinical educators. Identifying potential discrepancies in perceived roles in student development may help improve athletic training student education through a shared understanding of role delineation. Objective To understand the perceived roles of faculty and preceptors in athletic training student development. Design Consensual qualitative research. Setting Videoconference focus group interviews. Patients or Other Participants Eight faculty, 7 preceptors, and 7 dual-role faculty/preceptors representing professional athletic training programs participated in this study. Data saturation guided the number of focus groups conducted. Data Collection and Analysis Semistructured focus group interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim. Four researchers used a consensus process to analyze data, identify emergent themes, and create a codebook independently. We created a consensual codebook using identified themes and subgroups. Trustworthiness was established with the use of multiple researchers and an external auditor. Results Three themes emerged from the data: (1) contributors to role achievement, (2) challenges to role achievement, and (3) perceived improvements. Factors contributing to role achievement included positive relationships, effective communication, role development, student development, and socialization. Challenges to role achievement included preparation for the role, student commitment, role strain, ineffective communication, authenticity of learning, and preceptor willingness. Suggestions for perceived improvements included concept integration and application, programmatic leadership, and culture. Conclusions Some participants identified ineffective communication as a challenge to role development. Others noted effective communication as a contributor to role development. Limited formal training exists for faculty and preceptors relative to their respective roles in student development, and many draw from their own past experiences to better fulfill those roles.

scholarly journals Employer and Employee Opinions of Thematic Deficiencies in New Athletic Training Graduates

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. David Carr ◽  
Jennifer Volberding
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Interpersonal Communication ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Work Force ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Work Settings ◽  
New Graduates ◽  
National Athletic Trainers Association ◽  
Group Interviews ◽  
Job Orientation

Context: Anecdotal information has been shared for several years that employers do not feel that new athletic training graduates are ready for the workforce. To date there have been no studies of employers and employees to determine deficiencies in order to confirm or refute this position. Objective: To explore the opinions of employers and employees (recent graduates within the last 3–5 years) about the level of preparation and readiness for the work force of new athletic training graduates. Specifically, the purpose was to examine the themes emerging from interviews with employers and employees about the employee's abilities. Design and Setting: A mixed methods quantitative/qualitative design involving in-depth focus group interviews. Interviews were conducted in a controlled environment during the National Athletic Trainers' Association Annual Symposium in June of 2010. Participants: Eleven employers and five employees were available at scheduled times during the symposium. Extensive networking efforts were conducted to solicit participants from 3 work settings; college/university, high school/clinic/outreach, and emerging practices. Data Collection and Analysis: Focus group interviews were videotaped then transcribed verbatim and analyzed deductively. Peer debriefing and member checks were used to ensure trustworthiness. Results: Several ‘thematic’ deficiencies, or abilities, that were lacking emerged from our analysis. Both groups cited: 1) interpersonal communication, 2) decision making/independence, 3) initiative, 4) confidence, and 5) humility/ability to learn from mistakes as abilities that were deficient in new graduates. Administrative skills was the only thematic deficiency cited by the employees but not the employers. Conclusion: Limitations of current curriculum education models and employer-driven on-the-job-orientation and experience were identified as areas of concern.

scholarly journals Perception and manifestation of collaborative competencies among undergraduate health students

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Wládia Silva de Lima ◽  
Fábia Alexandra Pottes Alves ◽  
Francisca Márcia Pereira Linhares ◽  
Marcelo Viana da Costa ◽  
Maria Wanderleya de Louvor Coriolano-Marinus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Research Strategy ◽  
Intervention Research ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Group Interviews

Objective: to analyze the perception and manifestation of collaborative teamwork competencies among undergraduate health students who experienced the curricular internship’s integration module from the perspective of interprofessional education. Method: qualitative study, developed with the intervention research strategy. Twenty-eight students from five undergraduate health courses participated. Data were collected in three focus group interviews conducted with the undergraduate students at the end of each semester. For data analysis, the technique of intervention research and dialectical hermeneutics adopted was based on the theoretical framework of interprofessional education in health. Results: uniprofessional culture, the experience of integration of different fields of knowledge and collaborative competencies were manifested by the students in their reports and in the actions developed by the multidisciplinary team with individuals and families, during the experience of the curricular internship’s integration module. Conclusion: the experience of integration of the curricular internship from the perspective of interprofessionality favored the perception and manifestation of collaborative competencies that are necessary for teamwork among the students.

scholarly journals Equity in Distance Education During COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Tamika K Williams ◽  
Robert W McIntosh ◽  
William B. Russell
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Distance Education ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Digital Divide ◽  
Phenomenological Approach ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Access To Technology ◽  
Group Interviews

The COVID-19 pandemic forced districts, schools, and teachers to mobilize in order to deal with the digital inequities that have existed for decades. At the beginning stages of technological advances in education, the so-called digital divide related more to access to technology and equipment. Utilizing the phenomenological approach to qualitative research, this study examines the experiences of educators who served students with differing experiences and needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Total of 14 (N) educators (including adminstrators, teachers, and counselors) participated likert style questionaires. 11 of 14 participated in focus group interviews. Findings are shared and conclusions are drawn.  

scholarly journals Athletic Training Student Communication: What They Need to Talk About

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-184
Author(s):  
W. David Carr ◽  
Ben Timson ◽  
Jennifer Volberding
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Interpersonal Relationships ◽  
Junior College ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
New Employees ◽  
Work Settings ◽  
New Graduates ◽  
Group Interviews

Context: Employers note that new athletic training graduates are not able to effectively communicate. To date no studies have determined what topics new graduates need to be able to communicate. Objective: To explore the opinions of athletic training preceptors as to what topics need to be communicated with a variety of stakeholders. Specifically, we wanted to explore what topics are communicated, what barriers exist to getting students involved in professional communication, and what strategies could be used to overcome those barriers. Design and Setting: A qualitative design involving in-depth focus-group interviews. Interviews were conducted in a controlled environment. Patients or Other Participants: Athletic trainers from 3 work settings were included: high school (3 male and 3 female; average age 32.5 ± 6.1 years), college/university/junior college (5 male and 1 female; average age 34.5 ± 6.8 years), and clinic/emerging practices (1 male and 4 female; average age 27.4 ± 2.8 years). Main Outcome Measure(s): Focus-group interviews were audiotaped and then transcribed verbatim and analyzed deductively. Peer debriefing and member checks were used to ensure trustworthiness. Results: The most often-cited topics to communicate were related to prognosis of the injury with limitations and return to play. The most often-cited barrier to getting students involved was related to interpersonal relationships, with participants noting that it was their role to lead the communication. The most often-cited strategy for getting students involved was challenging the student to do something he had not done before. Conclusions: It is not realistic to expect new graduates to be proficient at communication if they are not given opportunities while enrolled as students. Preceptors should consider utilizing strategies to overcome barriers and get students more involved. Furthermore, it is important that employers anticipate these deficiencies and mentor new employees appropriately.

scholarly journals Online Catalogs from the Users’ Perspective: The Use of Focus Group Interviews

1997 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Silipigni Connaway ◽  
Debra Wilcox Johnson ◽  
Susan E. Searing
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Controlled Vocabulary ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Library System ◽  
University Of Wisconsin ◽  
Online Catalogs ◽  
Group Interviews ◽  
Keyword Searching

In an attempt to elicit information from the users of the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s online catalog, Network Library System (NLS), the General Library System (GLS), conducted focus group interviews with undergraduate students, graduate students, and faculty. Undergraduate students tend to utilize subject searching capabilities. Graduate students and faculty utilize subject searching only as a last resort; they typically search by known author or title. A significant number of the participants reported experience with library online catalogs other than NLS, although the majority of faculty reported very little experience with other online catalogs. All the focus group participants, but particularly the undergraduate students, evidenced confusion between keyword searching and searching using controlled vocabulary. Inclusion of circulation status in the bibliographic record was identified as an important feature of the catalog.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document