scholarly journals Program Directors' Perceptions of Programmatic Attributes Contributing to Athletic Training Student Persistence

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Bowman ◽  
Thomas M. Dodge ◽  
Stephanie M. Mazerolle
Keyword(s):  
Student Retention ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Professional Education ◽  
Interpersonal Relations ◽  
Professional Socialization ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Student Centered ◽  
Athletic Training Student

Context Graduates of athletic training programs (ATPs) have identified factors contributing to their persistence through professional education. However, program directors have yet to elaborate on programmatic attributes that might contribute to athletic training student retention in their respective ATPs. Objective To determine program directors' perceptions of ATP strengths and areas for improvement regarding athletic training student retention. Design Qualitative study. Setting Bachelor's ATPs. Patients or Other Participants Sixteen ATP directors with 6.0 ± 4.0 years of experience in their current positions. Main Outcome Measure(s) The participants completed audio recorded telephone interviews. We analyzed the data using principles of grounded theory and maintained trustworthiness using multiple-analyst triangulation, peer review, and member checks. Results We found 2 themes to describe the strengths of bachelor's ATPs. Our participants thought that they provided a student-centered approach and diverse clinical education experiences leading to a supportive and exciting environment to foster athletic training student learning. We categorized the student centered approach theme into 3 subthemes: program size, student engagement and program atmosphere, and academic and clinical cohesion. Conclusions Program directors should strive to provide athletic training students with individual attention to help them feel welcomed, valued, and important. A small program size or adequate personnel can foster interpersonal relations which can provide athletic training students with mentoring opportunities. Improving ATP cohesion can provide learning opportunities which assist students in making connections and promote the importance of the academic and clinical education components of the ATP. Engaging athletic training students early through a variety of clinical education experiences can assist professional socialization and foster excitement for the profession.

scholarly journals Program Directors' Perceptions of Reasons Professional Master's Athletic Training Students Persist and Depart

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Bowman ◽  
William A. Pitney ◽  
Stephanie M. Mazerolle ◽  
Thomas M. Dodge
Keyword(s):  
Student Retention ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Interpersonal Relationships ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Telephone Interviews

Context Student retention is a key issue in higher education. With the increasing number of professional master's (PM) athletic training programs (ATPs), understanding student retention is necessary to maintain viable programs. Objective Explore program directors' perceptions of the reasons athletic training students persist and depart from PM ATPs. Design Qualitative study. Setting Professional master's athletic training programs. Patients or Other Participants We asked directors from all PM ATPs nationwide to complete an online survey. We obtained responses from 60.0% (15 out of 25) of the population. We also completed follow-up telephone interviews with directors from 8 PM ATPs. Main Outcome Measure(s) Directors of PM ATPs completed an online survey asking for reasons for student persistence and departure. We also conducted follow-up telephone interviews with randomly selected participants. During the telephone interviews, we asked participants for additional detail regarding the enrollment decisions of students. Results PM ATP directors stated that students persist due to their commitment to the profession and the interpersonal relationships they build with the program stakeholders. Conversely, students depart PM ATPs due to the rigor associated with completion, a change in career aspirations, and financial concerns. Conclusions Athletic training educators should strive to keep commitment and motivation levels high while fostering positive interpersonal relationships by providing a welcoming atmosphere and engaging clinical education experiences. Finally, mentors should be available to assist students with program completion, and students should have options available for defraying the cost associated with completing the PM ATP.

Program Directors' Perceptions of Professional Bachelor's Athletic Training Student Decisions to Persist and Depart

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Bowman ◽  
Jay Hertel ◽  
Stephanie M. Mazerolle ◽  
Thomas M. Dodge ◽  
Heather D. Wathington
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Student Persistence ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
The United States ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Telephone Interviews ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
Using Data

Context: Recent literature has focused on reasons for athletic training student persistence and departure. However, accredited professional bachelor's athletic training program (ATP) directors' opinions regarding student retention have yet to be studied, to our knowledge. Objective: To determine reasons for athletic training student persistence and departure from professional bachelor's ATPs across the United States from the program directors' (PDs') perspective. Design: Two-part qualitative study. Setting: Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education professional bachelor's ATPs. Patients or Other Participants: For Part 1 of this study, we asked PDs of all 343 ATPs to complete an online survey, gathering responses from 177 (51.6%). Using data saturation as a guide, Part 2 included performing follow-up telephone interviews to gain further understanding, clarity, and triangulation with 16 randomly selected PDs. Main Outcome Measure(s): During Part 1, participants chronicled responses to open-ended questions as part of the online survey. For the second part of the study, the telephone interviews followed a semistructured format and were recorded to facilitate transcription. We analyzed data using grounded theory and secured trustworthiness by using multiple-analyst triangulation, member checks, and a peer review. Results: Program directors reported athletic training students persist due to their career goals, the personal relationships they create, and because they enjoy and are dedicated to athletic training. The respondents stated that athletic training students leave ATPs because of the academic rigor, the program not meeting expectations, a loss of interest, career considerations, and financial reasons. Conclusions: Program directors should educate prospective athletic training students about athletic training by providing a realistic explanation of the roles and responsibilities of the profession. Selecting clinical education sites with preceptors who enjoy their career choice and good working conditions may help solidify athletic training student commitment to the ATP and the athletic training profession.

scholarly journals Retention Initiatives Used by Professional Bachelor's Athletic Training Program Directors

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Bowman ◽  
Stephanie M. Mazerolle ◽  
Thomas M. Dodge
Keyword(s):  
Student Retention ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Retention Rates ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
Athletic Training Program Directors

Context: Retaining athletic training students has been identified as problematic by approximately half of athletic training program (ATP) directors. It is unknown what ATP directors do to improve athletic training student retention. Objective: To identify initiatives that ATP directors use to improve the retention rates of athletic training students in their programs. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Undergraduate ATPs. Patients or Other Participants: We asked directors of ATPs across the nation to complete an Internet questionnaire. We obtained responses from 171 out of 343 ATP directors (51.6%). In addition, we completed follow-up interviews with 16 randomly selected ATP directors. Main Outcome Measure(s): During the online questionnaire, we asked ATP directors to describe any specific initiatives they or their ATP used that were aimed at retaining athletic training students and ideally what they would like to do to improve athletic training student retention at their institution. During the follow-up telephone interviews, we asked participants to further describe their retention strategies and other techniques not already mentioned in their questionnaire responses to gain further insight. We used a general inductive approach to analyze the data and performed multiple-analyst triangulation, member checks, and a peer review to ensure the trustworthiness of the analysis and results. Results: During data analysis, we identified 3 themes that highlight the ATP directors' initiatives to retain athletic training students. Directors discussed fostering a family atmosphere, strategic planning, and having resources available to support students as ways to improve retention. Conclusions: Athletic training program directors are encouraged to integrate students into their programs early through informal and formal participation opportunities, evaluate student potential prior to formal admissions, plausibly through an interview process, and educate students on scholarship opportunities to help offset tuition and fees associated with program completion.

Reflective Observation in the Clinical Education Setting: A Way to Promote Learning

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Mazerolle ◽  
Thomas G. Bowman ◽  
Sarah S. Benes
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Student Development ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Observational Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Experiences ◽  
Learning Preferences ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
National Athletic Trainers Association

Context Clinical experiences help athletic training students gain real-time learning experiences by engaging in patient care. Observational learning has been identified as important to athletic training student development, yet little is known about its effectiveness. Objective To explore the athletic training students' perspectives on their experiences in the clinical education setting, particularly examining the effectiveness of observational learning. Design Qualitative study. Setting Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education (CAATE)-accredited undergraduate programs. Patients or Other Participants Twenty-four athletic training students (7 juniors and 17 seniors) from 4 National Athletic Trainers' Association (NATA) districts volunteered to participant in our study. The average age was 21 years (range, 20–23 years). Main Outcome Measure(s) Participants responded to a series of open-ended questions by journaling their thoughts and opinions through the secure Web site QuestionPro. Questions examined clinical education experiences and learning preferences. The resulting data were analyzed using a general inductive procedure, and credibility was established by employing peer review, member checks, and multiple analyst triangulation. Results Our analysis revealed that observational learning can benefit students when academic standing is considered, the circumstances are right, and it allows for directed mentoring. Our participants valued opportunities to engage in observational learning, as long as it was limited and purposeful. Conclusions All 24 participants identified themselves as hands-on learners who preferred to be actively engaged during their learning experiences, but who also valued opportunities to observe their preceptors demonstrating and modeling appropriate skills and behaviors before engaging in the same practices themselves. Today's student, the millennial, appears to favor visual learning, which may partially explain why our cohort of athletic training students described observational learning as advantageous in certain situations.

scholarly journals Athletic Training Students' Perceptions of Mentorship in Clinical Education

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Mazerolle ◽  
Christianne M. Eason ◽  
Sara Nottingham ◽  
Jessica L. Barrett
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Student Development ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Developmental Process ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Socialization Process ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
The Impact

Context: Mentorship is a developmental process whereby a novice individual, as he/she becomes inducted into his/her area of expertise, is guided by a more experienced person. Speculation exists that years of experience can impact this relationship. Objective: To determine the impact mentoring can have on athletic training student development and evaluate if experience as a preceptor is viewed as influential on the mentor experience. Design: Mixed-methods study. Setting: Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education accredited programs. Patients or Other Participants: We recruited 17 (14 females, 3 males) athletic training students to participate in our study. On average, our participants were 21 ± 1 years old and represented varying levels of academic standing (1 sophomore, 9 juniors, 7 seniors). All participants indicated they currently had a mentor when asked directly. Main Outcome Measure(s): Participants responded to the Athletic Training Perceptions of Effective Mentoring survey and 14 open-ended interview questions regarding their perceptions of mentoring. An inductive approach was used to identify themes and supporting categories. Trustworthiness was established by using multiple-analyst triangulation, peer review and piloting of the instruments, and triangulation of data using a mixed-methods approach. Results: Athletic training students perceive their mentoring experiences as those that provide support and understanding, advance their clinical practice, and allow for the development of career goals. Age and experience did not appear to impact the overall experience of the student but rather facilitates the type of mentoring relationship developed. Conclusions: Mentoring was perceived to be an advantageous aspect of the socialization process for the athletic training student. It provided support and understanding during times of increased stress, allowed for the development of clinical skills, and provided the chance to cultivate a professional identity.

scholarly journals A Mandala: A Diagram of the Clinical Education Experience in Athletic Training

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-15
Author(s):  
Steve Cernohous ◽  
Sharon West
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Interpersonal Competence ◽  
Self Awareness ◽  
Clinical Experiences ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Self Reflection ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
Athletic Training Educators

Objective: The objective of this paper is to present the practical use of a Mandala that: 1) provides opportunities for athletic training students to explore, reflect on and appreciate their clinical experiences; 2) provides educators with a model to understand and value athletic training student experiences; 3) organizes and captures factors and associated relationships that influence the athletic training student's clinical experience; and 4) provides impetus for further research and discussion between and among athletic training educators. Background: Athletic training educators often find it difficult to demonstrate and assess the behavioral component of learning. Creative teaching strategies and exercises that help athletic training students develop interpersonal competence, self-awareness, and self-reflection are needed in athletic training education. One approach to address this need is to employ the practical exercise of creating athletic training student Mandalas; portraits of self-expression and interpretation of their athletic training clinical experience. Description: The Mandala of Clinical Education depicts the individualistic and complex elements of the athletic training student clinical experience. It is a manifestation of a milieu of intrinsic and extrinsic elements, personal experience, and established research. The athletic training student is positioned in the center of the Mandala, embraced by contributing elements and the wholeness of the clinical experience. The artistic design reveals a series of gates, doors, and portals in which the elements of the student's experiences interact and serve as a point for self-reflection. Conclusion: Mandalas allow the athletic training student and educator opportunities to explore, understand, and value all clinical experiences in athletic training. Mandalas may also facilitate athletic training students developing interpersonal competence, self-awareness and self-reflection, all of which are key components to the foundational behaviors of professional practice.

scholarly journals Athletic Training Student Socialization Part II: Socializing the Professional Master's Athletic Training Student

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Mazerolle ◽  
Thomas G. Bowman ◽  
Thomas M. Dodge
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Professional Socialization ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Telephone Interviews ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
Student Socialization ◽  
Member Checks ◽  
Undergraduate Programs ◽  
Social Engagements

Context Professional socialization is a key process in the professional development of athletic training students. Literature has focused on many perspectives regarding socialization and has primarily focused on the undergraduate level. Objective Gain insights from the program director at professional master's (PM) athletic training programs on methods used to socialize students into programs and the profession. Design Qualitative study. Setting One-on-one telephone interviews. Patients or Other Participants A total of 8 PM program directors volunteered for our study. The Table provides information on the institutions represented by these participants. Our program directors had 8 ± 6 years of experience in their current roles and were 41± 4 years old. Data Collection and Analysis We conducted 1-on-1 phone interviews and transcribed the interviews verbatim. We performed a general inductive analysis of the data. We also completed member checks, multiple analyst triangulation, and peer reviews to establish data and methodological credibility. Results Our findings indicated that PM programs utilize a combination of formal and informal processes to orient the student, which is comparable to those processes used by undergraduate programs to socialize their students. The formal processes included orientation sessions and introductory courses. Social gatherings and program outings along with peer mentoring were also methods employed by PM programs to assist in socializing the student, but these methods were informal in nature. Conclusions Program autonomy allows for athletic training programs to personalize their tactics to socialize the student, but it does appear that the use of orientation sessions and introduction courses allows PM programs to formally introduce the profession and program. Less structured socialization strategies include peer-driven mentoring and social engagements that promote interaction and stress-relief. Programs are encouraged to evaluate their current socialization tactics and take advantage of the benefits of peer support and times to directly communicate with their students.

scholarly journals Perceived Levels of Frustration During Clinical Situations in Athletic Training Students

2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Heinerichs ◽  
Neil Curtis ◽  
Alison Gardiner-Shires
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Athletic Training Education ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
Education Experience

Context: Athletic training students (ATSs) are involved in various situations during the clinical experience that may cause them to express levels of frustration. Understanding levels of frustration in ATSs is important because frustration can affect student learning, and the clinical experience is critical to their development as professionals. Objective:  To explore perceived levels of frustration in ATSs during clinical situations and to determine if those perceptions differ based on sex. Design:  Cross-sectional study with a survey instrument. Setting:  A total of 14 of 19 professional, undergraduate athletic training programs accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education in Pennsylvania. Patients or Other Participants:  Of a possible 438 athletic training students, 318 (72.6%) completed the survey. Main Outcomes Measure(s):  The Athletic Training Student Frustration Inventory was developed and administered. The survey gathered demographic information and included 24 Likert-scale items centering on situations associated with the clinical experience. Descriptive statistics were computed on all items. The Mann-Whitney U was used to evaluate differences between male and female students. Results:  A higher level of frustration was perceived during the following clinical situations: lack of respect by student-athletes and coaching staffs, the demands of the clinical experience, inability of ATSs to perform or remember skills, and ATSs not having the opportunity to apply their skills daily. Higher levels of frustration were perceived in female than male ATSs in several areas. Conclusions:  Understanding student frustration during clinical situations is important to better appreciate the clinical education experience. Low levels of this emotion are expected; however, when higher levels exist, learning can be affected. Whereas we cannot eliminate student frustrations, athletic training programs and preceptors need to be aware of this emotion in order to create an environment that is more conducive to learning.

scholarly journals Athletic Training Students' Perceptions of the Immersive Clinical Experience and its Influence on their Development

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-41
Author(s):  
Anna M. Grimes ◽  
Elizabeth R. Neil ◽  
Cameron M. Eldred ◽  
Stacy E. Walker ◽  
Zachary J. Dougal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Student Perceptions ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Clinical Experiences ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
Athletic Training Program Directors ◽  
Quality Learning

Context Immersive clinical experiences are critical clinical education components in athletic training. Program directors have indicated potential isolation from peers and faculty, a financial burden, and less engagement in quality learning during immersive clinical experiences. Objective To explore athletic training students' perceptions of the immersive clinical experience as it pertains to their development. Design Qualitative study. Setting Individual virtual interviews. Patients or Other Participants A total of 15 athletic training students who participated in the immersive clinical experience in the last 9 months took part in our study (males = 4, females = 11; age = 25 ± 5 years, range = 21–36 years). Data Collection and Analysis We conducted interviews and recorded and transcribed them verbatim. We developed a codebook using the consensual qualitative research tradition to identify domains and categories. Trustworthiness was established using member-checking, multiple researchers, and an auditor. Results Athletic training student perceptions of the immersive clinical experience revealed 2 domains: exposure and improved preparation for clinical practice. From increased exposure, participants gained additional experience with administrative duties, communication and relationships, interprofessional and collaborative practice, an increased quantity and quality of patient encounters, and preceptor influence on learning opportunities. From improved preparation, participants experienced socialization in which they were more integrated in facility activities, gained a greater appreciation for the value of the profession, had greater autonomy and inclusion, and perceived more value in the immersive clinical experience than in nonimmersive experiences. Conclusions Athletic training students who participate in immersive clinical experiences feel that they have increased exposure to athletic training practice and improved preparation for transition to practice.

scholarly journals Is Direct Supervision in Clinical Education for Athletic Training Students Always Necessary to Enhance Student Learning?

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kent Scriber ◽  
Cindy Trowbridge
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Direct Supervision ◽  
Clinical Supervisors ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
Present Information

Objective: To present an alternative model of supervision within clinical education experiences. Background: Several years ago direct supervision was defined more clearly in the accreditation standards for athletic training education programs (ATEPs). Currently, athletic training students may not gain any clinical experience without their clinical supervisors being physically present so that the supervisors may intervene at any point if necessary. Although we do not disagree with the spirit of this requirement, we present information regarding the changing generation of students and the importance of developing strong professionals who will represent our field in the ever-changing allied health care arena. Clinical Advantages: We believe student learning may take place without direct supervision and that a system of guided autonomy with meaningful and dynamic reflection may better prepare the student for the future. W e feel that limited aspects of an athletic training student's clinical experience may not always need direct supervision. If students are performing skills that are not in violation of any professional practice acts, their interest and learning may increase with a guided autonomy model, as opposed to direct supervision. For example, once an athletic training student has mastered skills like taping, stretching, and initiating an emergency action plan, they should be able to effectively and safely perform these aspects without direct supervision. We suggest that students may continue to learn, and benefit from an educational standpoint, while gaining a limited portion of their experiential learning requirement without direct supervision.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document