scholarly journals Rare presentation of neurofibromatosis and Turner syndrome in a pediatric patient

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Gengel ◽  
Ian Marshall

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is classically defined by the presence of multiple c<em>afé-au-lait </em>macules as one of the diagnostic criteria. Turner syndrome (TS) can also present with <em>café-au-lait</em> macules along with short stature. Our patient is the fifth reported with both NF1 and TS and the first who has been on growth hormone for short stature associated with TS.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Dermitzaki ◽  
Emmanouil Manolakos ◽  
Panagiotis Tagalakis ◽  
Kleanthis Kleanthous ◽  
Dimitrios T Papadimitriou

Abstract Introduction: Turner syndrome (TS) occurs due to loss of either all or part of the X chromosome, in some or all the cells of the body. The most consistent features of TS are short stature and premature ovarian failure. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an inheritable in an autosomal dominant manner tumor predisposition syndrome and is caused by loss-of-function mutations in the tumor suppressor NF1 gene (neurofibromin 1). Literature review indicated rare cases with NF1 and TS (1). We report the sixth girl with mosaic TS and NF1 who presented with optic nerve glioma. Case report: A 2-year-old female presented to us due to short stature. Her height was 2,5 SD lower than the mean parental height curve, and her bone age was delayed only by 3 months. She already had a normal (46XX) peripheral blood karyotype (70 mitoses). She had abnormal body proportions and with short limbs with unremarkable café au lait spots. Additionally, to the short stature laboratory investigation we ordered a gene panel to exclude hypochondroplasia, and a Karyotype in fibroblasts culture from oral cavity sample. The results revealed low IGF-1 and mosaic TS in 14%. We preformed 2 provocative tests which revealed low growth hormone peak &lt; 5 ng/ml. A brain and pituitary MRI to exclude pituitary lesions or structural abnormalities revealed gliomas of the optic chiasma and the right optic nerve with characteristic NF1 “spots” (regions of signal abnormality in T2 sequences) involving the basal ganglia, cerebellum and the right temporal lobe. DNA sequencing targeted to a gene panel related to NF1 and NF2 revealed a novel de novo heterozygous NF1 gene mutation in exon 28 [3764Α&gt;G];[=]p.[Gln1255Arg]. Discussion: NF1- Gliomas are most commonly seen in young children, (mean 4.5 years). Only 1/3 of affected children will require therapeutic intervention. However early diagnosis, of optic gliomas is important. Our patient was completely asymptomatic by the time of diagnosis and no other symptom or sign of NF1 was apparent. Ophthalmologic examination was normal, but visual electrophysiologic testing was abnormal as far the right optic nerve is concerned. The oncology team decided to preform chemotherapy. In TS impaired growth is related to resistance in GH. Some studies suggested that there could be a relationship between GHD and NF1 even in the absence of an organic pituitary damage. In our patient it has been decided not to treat with GH and closely track the patient’s growth. Conclusion: Coexistence of NF1 with TS is rare. Awareness is needed as early identification and treatment of CNS gliomas can prevent visual loss and severe co-morbidities. 1. Rare Presentation of Neurofibromatosis and Turner Syndrome in a Pediatric Patient. Pediatr Rep. 2017 Jun 26; 9(2): 6810


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ejerskov ◽  
M. Raundahl ◽  
P. A. Gregersen ◽  
M. M. Handrup

Abstract Background The mosaic form of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is called mosaic NF1 (MNF1). No specific MNF1 follow-up guidelines exist. It is debatable if patients with MNF1 should be clinically examined and undergo follow-up in accordance with the standard NF1 guidelines, as MNF1 patients more often may develop more benign phenotypes and thereby less disease-associated complications including cognitive impairment. We discussed the need for a specific MNF1 follow-up guideline with focus on frequency of plexiform neurofibromas and NF1-associated complications. Method A systematic retrospective data collection in a MNF1 cohort from one of two Danish national centers of NF1 Expertise was completed. Data collected included demographics, clinical features including NF1 diagnostic criteria and NF1-associated complications. Recent literature in the field was reviewed. Results We identified 17 patients with MNF1 with a median age of 37 years [4; 66]. Eleven (65%) were females. Five patients (30%) had a plexiform neurofibroma. The median age at detection of plexiform neurofibroma was 30 years [14; 60]. Nine (53%) had at least one NF1-related complication; scoliosis, hypertension, ADHD, learning disability, language delay, autism and delay in gross and fine motor function development. We reviewed nine articles. In total, 126 cases were described within three case-series. Nineteen (15%) had a plexiform neurofibroma and in total, 23 NF1-associated complications were reported including language delay, learning disability and skeletal abnormalities. Furthermore, from the literature it was evident that the diagnosing of MNF1 varies among physicians and across countries. Conclusion Patients with MNF1 present with plexiform neurofibromas and other NF1-related complications with a frequency requiring that follow-up of MNF1 patients should be in accordance with the standard NF1 guideline in both childhood and adulthood. Physicians should be aware of cognitive impairment as a complication to MNF1. To develop a specific MNF1 follow-up guideline, there is a need for an international consensus on the diagnostic criteria for MNF1 and a follow-up study conducted in a larger MNF1 cohort.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilie Ejerskov ◽  
Maj Raundahl ◽  
Pernille Axel Gregersen ◽  
Mette Møller Handrup

Abstract BackgroundThe mosaic form of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is called mosaic NF1 (MNF1). No specific MNF1 follow-up guidelines exist. It is debatable if patients with MNF1 should be clinically examined and undergo follow-up in accordance with the standard NF1 guidelines, as MNF1 patients more often may develop more benign phenotypes and thereby less disease-associated complications including cognitive impairment. We discussed the need for a specific MNF1 follow-up guideline with focus on frequency of plexiform neurofibromas and NF1-associated complications.MethodA systematic retrospective data collection in a MNF1 cohort from one of two Danish national centers of NF1 Expertise was completed. Data collected included demographics, clinical features including NF1 diagnostic criteria and NF1-associated complications. Recent literature in the field was reviewed.ResultsWe identified 17 patients with MNF1 with a median age of 37 years [4; 66]. Eleven (65%) were females. Five patients (30%) had a plexiform neurofibroma. The median age at detection of plexiform neurofibroma was 30 years [14; 60]. Nine (53%) had at least one NF1-related complication; scoliosis, hypertension, ADHD, learning disability, language delay, autism and delay in gross and fine motor function development. We reviewed nine articles. In total, 126 cases were described within three case-series. Nineteen (15%) had a plexiform neurofibroma and in total, 23 NF1-associated complications were reported including language delay, learning disability and skeletal abnormalities. Furthermore, from the literature it was evident that the diagnosing of MNF1 varies among physicians and across countries. ConclusionPatients with MNF1 present with plexiform neurofibromas and other NF1-related complications with a frequency requiring that follow-up of MNF1 patients should be in accordance with the standard NF1 guideline in both childhood and adulthood. Physicians should be aware of cognitive impairment as a complication to MNF1. To develop a specific MNF1 follow-up guideline, there is a need for an international consensus on the diagnostic criteria for MNF1 and a follow-up study conducted in a larger MNF1 cohort.


2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 900 ◽  
Author(s):  
BijeshR Nair ◽  
GandhamE Jonathan ◽  
Vivek Joseph ◽  
Sunithi Mani ◽  
Geeta Chacko

2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Hatipoglu ◽  
S. Kurtoglu ◽  
M. Kendirci ◽  
M. Keskin ◽  
H. per

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith A. Murovic ◽  
Daniel H. Kim ◽  
David G. Kline

In this paper the authors describe a patient with neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) who presented with sequelae of this disease. They also review the current literature on NF1 and NF2 published between 2001 and 2005. The method used to obtain information for the case report consisted of a family member interview and a review of the patient's chart. For the literature review the authors used the search engine Ovid Medline to identify papers published on the topic between 2001 and 2005. Neurofibromatosis Type 1 appears in approximately one in 2500 to 4000 births, is caused by a defect on 17q11.2, and results in neurofibromin inactivation. The authors reviewed the current literature with regard to the following aspects of this disease: 1) diagnostic criteria for NF1; 2) criteria for other NF1-associated manifestations; 3) malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs); 4) the examination protocol for a patient with an NF1-related NST; 5) imaging findings in patients with NF1; 6) other diagnostic studies; 7) surgical and adjuvant treatment for NSTs and malignant PNSTs; and 8) hormone receptors in NF1-related tumors. Pertinent illustrations are included. Neurofibromatosis Type 2 occurs much less frequently than NF1, that is, in one in 33,000 births. Mutations in NF2 occur on 22q12 and result in inactivation of the tumor suppressor merlin. The following data on this disease are presented: 1) diagnostic criteria for NF2; 2) criteria for other NF2 manifestations; 3) malignant PNSTs in patients with NF2; 4) examination protocol for the patient with NF2 who has an NST; and 5) imaging findings in patients with NF2. Relevant illustrations are included. It is important that neurosurgeons be aware of the sequelae of NF1 and NF2, because they may be called on to treat these conditions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 309-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wahib Zafar ◽  
Benjamin Chaucer ◽  
Fidencio Davalos ◽  
Siddiqui Beenish ◽  
Marie Chevenon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document