scholarly journals The influence on biogas production of three slurry-handling systems in dairy farms

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damiano Coppolecchia ◽  
Davide Gardoni ◽  
Cecilia Baldini ◽  
Federica Borgonovo ◽  
Marcella Guarino
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Dairy Farm ◽  
Dairy Farms ◽  
Organic Matter Concentration ◽  
Deep Pit ◽  
Volatile Solids ◽  
Methane Potential ◽  
Solid Liquid ◽  
Solid Liquid Separation

Handling systems can influence the production of biogas and methane from dairy farm manures. A comparative work performed in three different Italian dairy farms showed how the most common techniques (scraper, slatted floor, flushing) can change the characteristics of collected manure. Scraper appears to be the most <em>neutral</em> choice, as it does not significantly affect the original characteristics of manure. Slatted floor produces a manure that has a lower methane potential in comparison with scraper, due to: a lower content of volatile solids caused by the biodegradation occurring in the deep pit, and a lower specific biogas production caused by the change in the characteristics of organic matter. Flushing can produce three different fluxes: diluted flushed manure, solid separated manure and liquid separated manure. The diluted fraction appears to be unsuitable for conventional anaerobic digestion in completely stirred reactors (CSTR), since its content of organic matter is too low to be worthwhile. The liquid separated fraction could represent an interesting material, as it appears to accumulate the most biodegradable organic fraction, but not as primary substrate in CSTR as the organic matter concentration is too low. Finally, the solid-liquid separation process tends to accumulate inert matter in the solid separated fraction and, therefore, its specific methane production is low.

Performance Quantification of Manure Management Systems at 11 Northeastern U.S. Dairy Farms

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 973-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason P Oliver ◽  
Jenna E Schueler ◽  
Curt A Gooch ◽  
Stephanie Lansing ◽  
Diana S Aga
Keyword(s):  
Biogas Production ◽  
Dairy Farm ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Manure Management ◽  
Long Term Storage ◽  
Manure Slurry ◽  
Solid Liquid ◽  
Solid Liquid Separation ◽  
Term Storage

Abstract. The performance of manure management systems, on a component-by-component basis, at 11 Northeastern U.S. dairy farm concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO) was quantified by semi-continuous monitoring for 15 months. Each collaborating farm (CF) had one or more of the following: solid-liquid separation (SLS), separated solids(SS) treatment by lime, rotary drum processing and windrow composting, anaerobic treatment by anaerobic digestion (AD), lagoons, and long-term storage(s). Operational and performance metrics included: temperature, pH, total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), loading rates, and biogas production. Generally, most CFs had functional and well-operating systems based on expected and optimal operating conditions and sample constituent changes, although, sampling and monitoring limitations restricted complete performance assessments. Despite the limitations, differences in treatment effectiveness were noted, which were often related to influent conditions. Higher SLS solids capture efficiencies (typ. &gt; 40%), and biogas production rates (= 3.8 m3 d-1 lactating cow equivalents (LCE)-1), were associated with more concentrated manure slurry influents [TS &gt; 0.050 g g-1 wet basis (w.b.)]. Anaerobic digester configuration and the use of co-substrates also influenced anaerobic treatments. Generally, intensively managed ADs outperformed passively managed lagoons, and co-digestion enhanced biogas production (= 4.3 m3 d-1 LCE-1) and VS reductions (up to 48% w.b.), though co-digestion sometimes hampered process stability. The effectiveness of SS processing was also treatment dependent, with well-managed windrows yielding the greatest increases in TS concentrations (up to 0.600 g g-1 w.b.). Long-term storage of manure slurry had modest, non-significant, impacts on TS and VS concentrations, and pH. This work illustrated a range of manure management systems used on NE dairy farm CAFOs, parameterized their treatment of manure slurries and SS, and established a baseline for additional studies aimed at the capacity of these systems to mitigate emerging contaminant like antibiotic residues. Keywords: Anaerobic digestion, Antimicrobial resistance, Biogas, Compost, Lime treatment, Long-term storage, Solid-liquid separation.

scholarly journals Biochemical Methane Potential of Cork Boiling Wastewater at Different Inoculum to Substrate Ratios

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 3064
Author(s):  
Roberta Mota-Panizio ◽  
Manuel Jesús Hermoso-Orzáez ◽  
Luis Carmo-Calado ◽  
Gonçalo Lourinho ◽  
Paulo Sérgio Duque de Brito
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Organic Substrates ◽  
Biochemical Methane Potential ◽  
Volatile Solids ◽  
Working Volume ◽  
Methane Potential ◽  
Bmp Test ◽  
Cork Industry

The present study evaluates the digestion of cork boiling wastewater (CBW) through a biochemical methane potential (BMP) test. BMP assays were carried out with a working volume of 600 mL at a constant mesophilic temperature (35 °C). The experiment bottles contained CBW and inoculum (digested sludge from a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP)), with a ratio of inoculum/substrate (Ino/CBW) of 1:1 and 2:1 on the basis of volatile solids (VSs); the codigestion with food waste (FW) had a ratio of 2/0.7:0.3 (Ino/CBW:FW) and the codigestion with cow manure (CM) had a ratio of 2/0.5:0.5 (Ino/CBW:CM). Biogas and methane production was proportional to the inoculum substrate ratio (ISR) used. BMP tests have proved to be valuable for inferring the adequacy of anaerobic digestion to treat wastewater from the cork industry. The results indicate that the biomethane potential of CBWs for Ino/CBW ratios 1:1 and 2:1 is very low compared to other organic substrates. For the codigestion tests, the test with the Ino/CBW:CM ratio of 2/0.7:0.3 showed better biomethane yields, being in the expected values. This demonstrated that it is possible to perform the anaerobic digestion (AD) of CBW using a cosubstrate to increase biogas production and biomethane and to improve the quality of the final digestate.

scholarly journals Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgia Antonopoulou ◽  
Dimitrios Vayenas ◽  
Gerasimos Lyberatos
Keyword(s):  
Biogas Production ◽  
Economic Assessment ◽  
Methane Yield ◽  
Biochemical Methane Potential ◽  
Naoh Pretreatment ◽  
Volatile Solids ◽  
Methane Potential ◽  
Whole Slurry ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Pretreated Biomass

Various pretreatment methods, such as thermal, alkaline and acid, were applied on grass lawn (GL) waste and the effect of each pretreatment method on the Biochemical Methane Potential was evaluated for two options, namely using the whole slurry resulting from pretreatment or the separate solid and liquid fractions obtained. In addition, the effect of each pretreatment on carbohydrate solubilization and lignocellulossic content fractionation (to cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin) was also evaluated. The experimental results showed that the methane yield was enhanced with alkaline pretreatment and, the higher the NaOH concentration (20 g/100 gTotal Solids (TS)), the higher was the methane yield observed (427.07 L CH4/kg Volatile Solids (VS), which was almost 25.7% higher than the BMP of the untreated GL). Comparing the BMP obtained under the two options, i.e., that of the whole pretreatment slurry with the sum of the BMPs of both fractions, it was found that direct anaerobic digestion without separation of the pretreated biomass was favored, in almost all cases. A preliminary energy balance and economic assessment indicated that the process could be sustainable, leading to a positive net heat energy only when using a more concentrated pretreated slurry (i.e., 20% organic loading), or when applying NaOH pretreatment at a lower chemical loading.

scholarly journals Development of a Modified Plug-Flow Anaerobic Digester for Biogas Production from Animal Manures

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (13) ◽  
pp. 2628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gómez ◽  
Ramos-Suárez ◽  
Fernández ◽  
Muñoz ◽  
Tey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Plug Flow ◽  
Total Solid ◽  
Pilot Scale ◽  
Methane Yield ◽  
Organic Loading Rate ◽  
Pig Manure ◽  
Anaerobic Reactors ◽  
Methane Potential

Traditional plug-flow anaerobic reactors (PFRs) are characterized by lacking a mixing system and operating at high total solid concentrations, which limits their applicability for several kinds of manures. This paper studies the performance of a novel modified PFR for the treatment of pig manure, characterized by having an internal sludge mixing system by biogas recirculation in the range of 0.270–0.336 m3 m−3 h−1. The influence on the methane yield of four operating parameters (recirculation rate, hydraulic retention time, organic loading rate, and total solids) was evaluated by running four modified PFRs at the pilot scale in mesophilic conditions. While the previous biodegradability of organic matter by biochemical methane potential tests were between 31% and 47% with a methane yield between 125 and 184 LCH4 kgVS−1, the PFRs showed a suitable performance with organic matter degradation between 25% and 51% and a methane yield of up to 374 LCH4 kgVS−1. Operational problems such as solid stratification, foaming, or scum generation were avoided.

scholarly journals Production of recycled manure solids for bedding in Canadian dairy farms: I. Solid–liquid separation

2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 1832-1846 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Fournel ◽  
S. Godbout ◽  
P. Ruel ◽  
A. Fortin ◽  
M. Généreux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dairy Farms ◽  
Liquid Separation ◽  
Solid Liquid ◽  
Solid Liquid Separation

scholarly journals Optimisation of C:N Ratio for Co-Digested Processed Industrial Food Waste and Sewage Sludge Using the BMP Test

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuhaib Siddiqui ◽  
N.J. Horan ◽  
Kofi Anaman
Keyword(s):  
Sewage Sludge ◽  
Food Waste ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
C:N Ratio ◽  
Methane Yield ◽  
Biochemical Methane Potential ◽  
Volatile Solids ◽  
Methane Potential ◽  
Biomethane Production ◽  
Bmp Test

Biomethane production from processed industrial food waste (IFW) in admixture with sewage sludge (primary and waste activated sludge: PS and WAS) was evaluated at a range of C:N ratios using a standard biochemical methane potential (BMP) test. IFW alone had a C:N of 30 whereas for WAS it was 5.4 and thus the C:N ratio of the blends fell in that range. Increasing the IFW content in mix improves the methane potential by increasing both the cumulative biogas production and the rate of methane production. Optimum methane yield 239 mL/g VSremoved occurred at a C:N ratio of 15 which was achieved with a blend containing 11 percent (w/w) IFW. As the fraction of IFW in the blend increased, volatile solids (VS) destruction was increased and this led to a reduction in methane yield and amount of production. The highest destruction of volatile solids of 93 percent was achieved at C:N of 20 followed by C:N 30 and 15. A shortened BMP test is adequate for evaluating optimum admixtures.

scholarly journals Biochemical Methane Potential of Agro Wastes

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vidhya Prabhudessai ◽  
Anasuya Ganguly ◽  
Srikanth Mutnuri
Keyword(s):  
Biogas Production ◽  
Coconut Oil ◽  
Methane Yield ◽  
Batch Mode ◽  
Solids Concentration ◽  
Anaerobic Biodegradability ◽  
Volatile Solids ◽  
Cashew Apple ◽  
Methane Potential ◽  
Coconut Oil Cake

The focus of our work is on anaerobic digestion of locally available agro wastes like coconut oil cake, cashew apple waste, and grass from lawn cuttings. The most productive agro waste, in terms of methane yield, was coconut oil cake and grass. The results showed that the initial volatile solids concentration significantly affected the biogas production. The methane yield from coconut oil cake was found to be 383 ml CH4/g VS and 277 ml CH4/g VS added at 4 and 4.5 g VS/l. In case of grass the biogas production increased with increasing VS concentrations with methane yield of 199, 250, 256, 284, and 332 ml CH4/g VS at 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, and 5.0 g VS/l. For cashew apple waste single-stage fermentation inhibited biogas production. However, phase separation showed methane yield of 60.7 ml CH4/g VS and 64.6 ml CH4/g VS at 3.5 and 4.0 g VS/l, respectively. The anaerobic biodegradability of coconut oil cake was evaluated in fed batch mode in a 5 L anaerobic reactor at 4 g VS/L per batch, and the maximum methane yield was found to be 320 ml CH4/g VS.

scholarly journals Assessment of the biochemical methane potential of mono- and co-digested dairy farm wastes

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Adghim ◽  
Mohamed Abdallah ◽  
Suhair Saad ◽  
Abdallah Shanableh ◽  
Majid Sartaj
Keyword(s):  
Methane Production ◽  
Dairy Farm ◽  
Gompertz Model ◽  
Maximum Error ◽  
Methane Yield ◽  
Cow Manure ◽  
Biochemical Methane Potential ◽  
Volatile Solids ◽  
Waste Milk ◽  
Methane Potential

This study aimed to evaluate the methane potential of mono- and co-digested dairy farm wastes. The tested substrates included manure from lactating, dry, and young cows, as well as waste milk and feed waste. The highest methane yield was achieved from the lactating cow manure, which produced an average of 412 L of CH4 kg−1 volatile solids, followed by young and dry cow manures (332 and 273 L of CH4 kg−1 volatile solids, respectively). Feed and milk yielded an average of 325 and 212 L of CH4 kg−1 volatile solids, respectively. Co-digesting the manures from lactating and young cows with feed improved methane production by 7%. However, co-digesting the dry cow manure with feed achieved only 85% of the calculated methane yield. Co-digesting manure and milk at a ratio of 70:30 enhanced the methane potential from lactating, dry, and young cow manures by 19, 30, and 37%, respectively. Moreover, co-digesting lactating, dry, and young cow manures with milk at a ratio of 30:70 enhanced the methane yield by 60, 30, and 88%, respectively. The cumulative methane production of all samples was accurately described using the Gompertz model with a maximum error of 10%. Carbohydrates contributed the most to methane potential, while proteins and lipids were limiting.

Optimal Housing and Manure Management Strategies to Favor Productive and Environment-Friendly Dairy Farms in Québec, Canada: Part II. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Methods

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 973-984
Author(s):  
Sébastien Fournel ◽  
Édith Charbonneau ◽  
Simon Binggeli ◽  
Jean-Michel Dion ◽  
Doris Pellerin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Ghg Emissions ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Dairy Farms ◽  
Manure Management ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Liquid Separation ◽  
Manure Storage ◽  
Solid Liquid ◽  
Solid Liquid Separation

Abstract. Several strategies are available for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with dairy manure management in barns, storage units, and fields. For instance, incorporation of manure into the soil, solid-liquid separation, composting, enclosed manure storage, and anaerobic digestion have been identified as good options. However, these strategies are not widely adopted in Canada because clear information on their effectiveness to abate the whole-farm GHG footprint is lacking. Better information on the most cost-effective options for reducing on-farm GHG emissions would assist decision making for dairy producers and foster adoption of the most promising approaches on Canadian dairies. In this context, whole-farm modeling provides a tool for evaluating different GHG abatement strategies. An Excel-based linear optimization model (N-CyCLES) was used to assess the economics and the nutrient and GHG footprints of two representative dairy farms in Québec, Canada. The farms were located in regions with contrasting climates (southwestern and eastern Québec). The model was developed to optimize feeding, cropping, and manure handling as a single unit of management, considering the aforementioned mitigation options. Greenhouse gas emissions from the different simulated milk production systems reached 1.27 to 1.85 kg CO2e kg-1 of corrected milk, allowing GHG reductions of up to 25% compared to the base system described in Part I. Solid-liquid separation had the greatest GHG mitigation potential, followed by the digester-like strategy involving a tight cover for gas burning. However, both options implied a decrease in farm net income. Manure incorporation into the soil and composting were associated with high investment relative to their GHG abatement potential. The most cost-effective option was using a loose cover on the manure storage unit. This approach lessened the manure volume and ammonia-N volatilization, thereby reducing fertilizer and manure spreading costs, increasing crop sales and profit, and enhancing the whole-farm N and GHG footprints. Consequently, covering the manure tanks appears to be an economically viable practice for Québec dairy farms. Keywords: Anaerobic digestion, Composting, Dairy cow, Farm net income, Greenhouse gas emission, Incorporation, Nutrient footprint, Solid-liquid separation, Storage cover, Whole-farm model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document