On enveloping semigroups of almost one-to-one extensions of minimal group rotations

Rafał Pikuła

doi:10.4064/cm129-2-6

On enveloping semigroups of almost one-to-one extensions of minimal group rotations

Colloquium Mathematicum ◽

10.4064/cm129-2-6 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 129 (2) ◽

pp. 249-262 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Rafał Pikuła

Keyword(s):

Minimal Group ◽

One To One ◽

Enveloping Semigroups ◽

Group Rotations

Download Full-text

A Support Program

Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools ◽

10.1044/0161-1461.2502.112 ◽

1994 ◽

Vol 25 (2) ◽

pp. 112-114 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Henna Grunblatt ◽

Lisa Daar

Keyword(s):

Hearing Aids ◽

School Counselor ◽

Support Program ◽

Educational Audiology ◽

Part Program ◽

One To One

A program for providing information to children who are deaf about their deafness and addressing common concerns about deafness is detailed. Developed by a school audiologist and the school counselor, this two-part program is geared for children from 3 years to 15 years of age. The first part is an educational audiology program consisting of varied informational classes conducted by the audiologist. Five topics are addressed in this part of the program, including basic audiology, hearing aids, FM systems, audiograms, and student concerns. The second part of the program consists of individualized counseling. This involves both one-to-one counseling sessions between a student and the school counselor, as well as conjoint sessions conducted—with the student’s permission—by both the audiologist and the school counselor.

Download Full-text

Cognitive Components of Ingroup Projection

Social Psychology ◽

10.1027/1864-9335/a000156 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 45 (1) ◽

pp. 15-30 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Maya Machunsky ◽

Thorsten Meiser

Keyword(s):

Mental Representation ◽

Cognitive Representation ◽

Social Categories ◽

Projection Model ◽

Minimal Group ◽

Model Experiments ◽

Superordinate Category ◽

Cognitive Components ◽

Per Se

This research investigated whether relative ingroup prototypicality (i.e., the tendency to perceive one’s own ingroup as more prototypical of a superordinate category than the outgroup) can result from a prototype-based versus exemplar-based mental representation of social categories, rather than from ingroup membership per se as previously suggested by the ingroup projection model. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that a prototype-based group was perceived as more prototypical of a superordinate category than an exemplar-based group supporting the hypothesis that an intergroup context is not necessary for biased prototypicality judgments. Experiment 3 introduced an intergroup context in a minimal-group-like paradigm. The findings demonstrated that both the kind of cognitive representation and motivational processes contribute to biased prototypicality judgments in intergroup settings.

Download Full-text