scholarly journals Equivariant classification of 2-torus manifolds

2009 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Lü ◽  
Mikiya Masuda
Keyword(s):  
Equivariant Classification ◽  
Torus Manifolds

scholarly journals Non-negatively curved GKM orbifolds

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Goertsches ◽  
Michael Wiemeler
Keyword(s):  
Finite Groups ◽  
Orbit Spaces ◽  
Cohomology Rings ◽  
Negatively Curved ◽  
Rational Cohomology ◽  
Isometric Actions ◽  
Torus Manifolds

AbstractIn this paper we study non-negatively curved and rationally elliptic GKM$$_4$$ 4 manifolds and orbifolds. We show that their rational cohomology rings are isomorphic to the rational cohomology of certain model orbifolds. These models are quotients of isometric actions of finite groups on non-negatively curved torus orbifolds. Moreover, we give a simplified proof of a characterisation of products of simplices among orbit spaces of locally standard torus manifolds. This characterisation was originally proved in Wiemeler (J Lond Math Soc 91(3): 667–692, 2015) and was used there to obtain a classification of non-negatively curved torus manifolds.

scholarly journals Equivariant Classification of bm-symplectic Surfaces

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Miranda ◽  
Arnau Planas
Keyword(s):  
Equivariant Classification

Note on the spectral classification of carbon stars in the photographic infrared region

1966 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 21-23
Author(s):  
Y. Fujita
Keyword(s):  
Infrared Region ◽  
Spectral Classification ◽  
Carbon Stars

We have investigated the spectrograms (dispersion: 8Å/mm) in the photographic infrared region fromλ7500 toλ9000 of some carbon stars obtained by the coudé spectrograph of the 74-inch reflector attached to the Okayama Astrophysical Observatory. The names of the stars investigated are listed in Table 1.

Diagnostic Value of Electron Microscopy in Soft Tissue Tumors

1970 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 220-221
Author(s):  
Gerald Fine ◽  
Azorides R. Morales
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Myxoma ◽  
Osteogenic Sarcoma ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Amelanotic Melanoma ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Light Microscopic Level ◽  
Mesenchymal Tumors ◽  
Good Agreement

For years the separation of carcinoma and sarcoma and the subclassification of sarcomas has been based on the appearance of the tumor cells and their microscopic growth pattern and information derived from certain histochemical and special stains. Although this method of study has produced good agreement among pathologists in the separation of carcinoma from sarcoma, it has given less uniform results in the subclassification of sarcomas. There remain examples of neoplasms of different histogenesis, the classification of which is questionable because of similar cytologic and growth patterns at the light microscopic level; i.e. amelanotic melanoma versus carcinoma and occasionally sarcoma, sarcomas with an epithelial pattern of growth simulating carcinoma, histologically similar mesenchymal tumors of different histogenesis (histiocytoma versus rhabdomyosarcoma, lytic osteogenic sarcoma versus rhabdomyosarcoma), and myxomatous mesenchymal tumors of diverse histogenesis (myxoid rhabdo and liposarcomas, cardiac myxoma, myxoid neurofibroma, etc.)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document