scholarly journals Tensile bond strength between auto-polymerized acrylic resin and acrylic denture teeth treated with MF-MA solution

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ticha Thongrakard ◽  
Chairat Wiwatwarrapan
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Denture Teeth

Tensile bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth to a microwave- or heat-processed denture base

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Schneider ◽  
Erik R. Curtis ◽  
James M.S. Clancy
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Denture Teeth

Effect of Disinfection on the Bond Strength between Denture Teeth and Microwave-Cured Acrylic Resin Denture Base

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adaias O. Matos ◽  
Josiane O. Costa ◽  
Thamara Beline ◽  
Erika S. Ogawa ◽  
Wirley G. Assunção ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Denture Teeth

scholarly journals Bond Strength of Repaired Acrylic Denture Teeth Using Visible Light Cure Composite Resin

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saja Ali Muhsin
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Visible Light ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
P Value ◽  
Chemical Agents ◽  
Denture Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Way Anova ◽  
Shear Tester

Background: Although bonding to denture teeth after surface treatment with chemical agents is desirable, there is little information on the use of Visible Light Cure composite resin (VLC) as bonding denture materials. Objectives: To determine the effect of various surface treatments on shear bond strength between Visible Light Cure composite resin and the acrylic denture teeth interface. Methods: Forty cylindrical sticks of acrylic resin with denture teeth mounted atop were prepared. Various treatments were implemented upon the acrylic resin teeth surfaces. The samples were divided into four groups (n = 10). Light-cured composite resin (LC) was applied over all treated and untreated surfaces of tested groups. The shear bond was tested using a universal tensile testing apparatus with the knife-edge of a 0.8mm shear tester. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA performed at a confidence level of 95% and significant P-value of (P ≤ 0.05). Results: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between treated and untreated teeth surfaces. The treated surfaces exhibited various levels of bond strength depending on the type of treatment. Conclusion: Application of VLC bonding agent with prior treatment of methylmethacrylate (MMA) on the acrylic resin denture teeth resulted in maximum bond strength with composite resin.

The Effects of Er:YAG, Nd:YAG, and Ho:YAG Laser Surface Treatments to Acrylic Resin Denture Bases on the Tensile Bond Strength of Silicone-Based Resilient Liners

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 409-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oguzhan Gorler ◽  
Derya Ozdemir Dogan ◽  
Melih Ulgey ◽  
Aysegul Goze ◽  
Ihsan Hubbezoğlu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Laser Surface ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Ho:Yag Laser

scholarly journals Tensile Bond Strength of a Soft Liner to an Acrylic Resin after Primer Application and Thermocycling

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1183-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Coelho Goiato ◽  
Daniela Micheline dos Santos ◽  
Rodrigo Antonio de Medeiros ◽  
Aljomar José Vechiato Filho ◽  
Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Soft Liner

scholarly journals Effect of Sealant Application and Thermal Cycling on Bond Strength of Tissue Conditioners to Acrylic Resin

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisca Neta Cruz Soares Sampaio ◽  
Jose Renato Ribeiro Pinto ◽  
Cecilia Pedroso Turssi ◽  
Roberta Tarkany Basting
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Thermal Cycling ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Thermal Cycles ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Soft Liner ◽  
Tissue Conditioner

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sealer application and thermal cycling on the bond strength between tissue conditioners and acrylic resin, and to observe the type of bond failure. Two hundred eighty-eight specimens (10x16x3 mm) were made of an acrylic resin (Lucitone 500, Dentsply) using a metal muffle. Specimens were divided into four groups according to the tissue conditioner (Coe-Comfort, GC or Dentusoft, Densell) used and whether or not a sealer (Eversoft Soft Liner Sealer, Myerson) was applied. Each of the four groups was subdivided into other six subgroups (n=12) to undergo thermocycling for 45, 90, 135, 180 or 210 cycles with a dwell time of 60 s, or to be left non thermocycled (control). Tensile bond strength was measured in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. Sealant application had no effect on the tensile bond strength of the relined acrylic resin, regardless of the tissue conditioner used (Coe-Comfort: p=0.306 and Dentusoft: p=0.1501). The number of thermal cycles had a significant effect on the tensile bond strength of the relined acrylic resin (Coe-Comfort: p=0.002 and Dentusoft: p<0.001). Both tissue conditioners presented similar bond strength to acrylic resin. For both tissue conditioners, sealer coatings had no influence on bond strength, while different numbers of thermal cycles affected that mechanical property.

scholarly journals Effect of Food Simulating Agents on the Hardness and Bond Strength of a Silicone Soft Liner to a Denture Base Acrylic Resin

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 402-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A.R. Khaledi ◽  
M. Bahrani ◽  
S. Shirzadi
Keyword(s):  
Citric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Bonding Failure ◽  
Base Resin ◽  
Soft Liner ◽  
Denture Base Resin

Statement of the Problem: Bonding failure between acrylic resin and soft liner material and also gradual loss of soft liner resiliency over time are two impending challenges frequently recognized with a denture base embraced with a resilient liner. Since patients drink various beverages, it is crucial to assess the influences of these beverages on physical characteristics of soft liners. Purpose: This in vitro study envisioned to assess the influence of food simulating agents (FSA) on the hardness of a silicone soft liner by employing a Shore A durometer test and also evaluate its bond strength to a denture base resin by using tensile bond strength test. Materials and Methods: To test the hardness of samples, 50 rectangular samples (40 mm × 10 mm × 3 mm) were prepared from a heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (Meliodent). Mollosil, a commercially available silicone resilient liner, was provided and applied on the specimens following the manufacturer’s directions. In order to test tensile bond strength, 100 cylindrical specimens (30 mm × 10 mm) were fabricated. The liners were added between specimens with the thicknesses of 3 mm. The specimens were divided into 5 groups (n=10) and immersed in distilled water, heptane, citric acid, and 50% ethanol. For each test, we used 10 specimens as a baseline measurement; control group. All specimens were kept in dispersed containers at 37ºC for 12 days and all solutions were changed every day. The hardness was verified using a Shore A durometer and the tensile bond strength was examined by an Instron testing machine at a cross-head speed of 5 mm/min. The records were analyzed employing one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD, and LSD tests. Results: The mean tensile bond strength ± standard deviation (SD) for Mollosil was as follows for each group: 3.1 ± 0.4 (water), 1.8 ± 0.4 (citric acid), 3.0 ± 0.4 (heptane), 1.2 ± 0.3 (50% ethanol), and 3.8 ± 0.4 (control). The hardness values for each group were: 28.7 ± 2.11 (water), 33.2 ± 2.82 (citric acid), 39.2 ± 4.8 (heptane), 32.3 ± 3.56 (50% ethanol) and 22.2 ± 2.08 (control). Mean values for hardness indicated that all of the food simulating agents significantly increased hardness of the Mollosil soft liner compared to the control group (p<0.05). The results of tensile bond strength depicted that water and FSA decreased the bond strength of the soft liner -denture base resin compared to the control group and it was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: The food simulating agents could influence the mechanical properties of silicone soft liners; hence, clinicians should inform their patients concerning their possible adverse effects and complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document