The Effects of Er:YAG, Nd:YAG, and Ho:YAG Laser Surface Treatments to Acrylic Resin Denture Bases on the Tensile Bond Strength of Silicone-Based Resilient Liners

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 409-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oguzhan Gorler ◽  
Derya Ozdemir Dogan ◽  
Melih Ulgey ◽  
Aysegul Goze ◽  
Ihsan Hubbezoğlu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Laser Surface ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Ho:Yag Laser

Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Soft Liners to an Acrylic Resin Denture Base with Various Curing Methods and Surface Treatments

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamidreza Haghi ◽  
Masoud Shiehzadeh ◽  
Jafar Gharechahi ◽  
Davood Nodehi ◽  
Asad Karazhian
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Curing Methods

scholarly journals Improvement in the Tensile Bond Strength between 3Y-TZP Ceramic and Enamel by Surface Treatments

Materials ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seon-Mi Byeon ◽  
Yong-Seok Jang ◽  
Min-Ho Lee ◽  
Tae-Sung Bae
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength

scholarly journals Evaluation of the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of non-precious alloy‒ceramic interface: An SEM study

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-207
Author(s):  
Vikram M. Belkhode ◽  
Sharayu V. Nimonkar ◽  
S. R. Godbole ◽  
Pranali Nimonkar ◽  
Seema Sathe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Surface Grinding ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Dental Porcelain ◽  
Surface Irregularities ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Background. Dental porcelain has excellent esthetics in combination with biocompatibility and is one of the most commonly used restorative materials. Its low tensile strength remains a major drawback. The porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations have been introduced to increase the fracture resistance of dental porcelain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of a non-precious alloy to ceramic. Methods. The present cross-sectional observational study was conducted with forty samples of cobalt‒chromium that were fabricated with porcelain interposed between the two metal test pieces. The metal was subjected to combinations of different surface treatments. The samples group A (n=10) were not subjected to any surface treatments. Group B samples underwent sandblasting and surface grinding. Group C samples were subjected to sandblasting, surface grinding and degassing; and group D samples underwent sandblasting, surface grinding, ultrasonic cleaning and degassing. The tensile bond strength was measured in a universal testing machine, and a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to obtain images of the samples after surface treatment to determine the surface irregularities and after the debonding of the samples for the type of the bond failure. ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis. Results. The results showed significant variations in the tensile bond strength between the four groups (F=251.05, P=0.000). The SEM images of group A showed no surface irregularities; group C samples exhibited surface irregularities more than those in group B. Group D had the highest surface irregularities. SEM evaluations showed a statistically significant difference in the type of bond failure (P<0.001). Conclusion. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the surface treatments on the metal increased the bond strength of the metal‒ceramic interface significantly. A combination of sandblasting, surface grinding and ultrasonic cleaning, followed by degassing, resulted in the highest tensile bond strength.

Tensile bond strength of an adhesive resin cement to different alloys having various surface treatments

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amara Abreu ◽  
Maria A. Loza ◽  
Augusto Elias ◽  
Siuli Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Stephen Looney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement

Effect of different surface treatments on tensile bond strength of silicone-based soft denture liner

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 783-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Akin ◽  
Faik Tugut ◽  
Burcu Mutaf ◽  
Gulsah Akin ◽  
A. Kemal Ozdemir
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Soft Denture Liner
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document