The Usefulness of Pleural IFN-gamma Level in Differential Diagnosis of Tuberculous Pleural Effusion and Malignant Pleural Effusion

1998 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 280
Author(s):  
Myung Sun Kim ◽  
Sung Eun Yang ◽  
Hyun Sook Chi ◽  
Woo Sung Kim ◽  
Won Dong Kim
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Malignant Pleural Effusion ◽  
Ifn Gamma ◽  
Tuberculous Pleural Effusion

scholarly journals Differential diagnosis between lymphoma-associated malignant pleural effusion and tuberculous pleural effusion

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (16) ◽  
pp. 373-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Ho Kim ◽  
Hong Geun Oh ◽  
Sang Yub Lee ◽  
Jae Kwang Lim ◽  
Yong Hoon Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Malignant Pleural Effusion ◽  
Tuberculous Pleural Effusion

The Differential Diagnosis in Nonlymphoproliferative Malignant Pleural Effusion Cytopathology and Its Correlation with Patients’ Demographics

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 436-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika F. Rodriguez ◽  
Sayanan Chowsilpa ◽  
Zahra Maleki
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
African American ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Malignant Pleural Effusion ◽  
Primary Site ◽  
Gi Tract ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Caucasian Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Background: We report our experience with malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and the impact of patients’ demographics on the differential diagnosis at the primary site. Methods: After IRB approval, we searched our pathology database from January 2013 to January 2017 for patients with positive pleural effusions (PEs). Patients’ demographics and clinical histories were noted. Results: 474 patients were identified (288 females [61%] and 186 males [39%]), ranging in age from 19 to 64 years old. Ethnicity was distributed as follows: Caucasian (n = 330, 70%), African American (n = 114, 24%) and Asian (n = 30, 6%). The most common primary sites were the lung (n = 180, 37%), followed by the breast (n = 81, 17%), and the gynecologic system (67, 13%). The lung was the most common primary for all ethnicities (n = 190, 40%). The second-most common primary site was the breast in African Americans and Caucasians and upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract in Asians. In 5 cases (1%), the primary tumor could not be determined. Conclusion: Cytology examination is a useful method to diagnose primary sites of PE. Pulmonary primary is the most common cause of effusion in all ethnicities. In African American and Caucasian patients, the breast was the second-most common site of MPE, while in Asian patients it was the upper GI tract.

scholarly journals The Differential Diagnostic Values of Cytokine Levels in Pleural Effusions

2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saadet Akarsu ◽  
A. Nese Citak Kurt ◽  
Yasar Dogan ◽  
Erdal Yilmaz ◽  
Ahmet Godekmerdan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Parapneumonic Effusion ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Tuberculous Pleural Effusion ◽  
Cytokine Levels ◽  
Diagnostic Values

The aim is to examine whether the changes in pleural fluid interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-8 levels were significant in differential diagnosis of childhood pleural effusions. IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-8 levels in pleural fluids of all 36 patients were measured. The levels of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-8 in pleural fluids were statistically significantly higher in the transudate group compared with those of the exudate group. The levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 were also found to be statistically significantly higher in the empyema group compared with both the parapneumonic and the tuberculous pleural effusion groups. The levels of IL-2 and IL-6 were detected to be statistically significantly higher in the tuberculous pleural effusion group in comparison with those of the parapneumonic effusion group. The results showed that pleural fluids IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-8 could be used in pleural fluids exudate and transudate distinction.

scholarly journals CEA and ADA in Pleural Fluid for Differential Malignant Pleural Effusion and Tuberculous Pleural Effusion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianhong Yu ◽  
Qirui Cai
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Malignant Pleural Effusion ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Diagnostic Model ◽  
Diagnostic Efficacy ◽  
Tuberculous Pleural Effusion ◽  
Diagnostic Models ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Abstract Objective This study aimed to establish a predictive model based on the clinical manifestations and laboratory findings in pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusion for the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE). Methods Clinical data and laboratory indices of pleural fluid were collected from patients with malignant pleural effusion and tuberculous pleural effusion in Zigong First People's Hospital between January 2019 and June 2020，and were compared between the two groups. Independent risk factors or Independent protective factors for malignant pleural effusion were investigated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance of factors with independent effects, and combined diagnostic models were established based on two or more factors with independence effect. ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic ability of each model, and the fit of the eath model was measured using Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Results Patients with MPE were older than those with TPE, the rate of fever of patients with MPE was lower than that of patients with TPE, and these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin-19 fragment antigen (CYFRA21-1), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and glucose (GLU) levels in the pleural fluid were higher, but total protein (TP), albumin (ALB) and Adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels in the pleural fluid were lower in MPE patients than in TPE patients, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, CEA and NSE levels in the pleural fluid were independent risk factors for MPE, whereas ADA levels in pleural fluid and fever were independent protective factors for MPE. The differential diagnostic value of pleural fluid CEA and pleural fluid ADA for MPE and TPE were higher than that of pleural fluid NSE（p<0.05） and the area under the ROC curve was 0.901, 0.892, and 0.601, respectively. Four different binary logistic diagnostic models were established based on pleural fluid CEA combined with pleural fluid NSE, pleural fluid ADA or ( and ) fever. Among them, the model established with the combination of pleural fluid CEA and pleural fluid ADA (logit (P) = 0.513 + 0.457*CEA-0.101*ADA) had the highest diagnostic value for malignant pleural effusion, and its predictive accuracy was high with an area under the ROC curve of 0.968 [95% confidence interval (0.947, 0.988)]. But the diagnostic efficacy of the diagnostic model could not be improved by adding pleural fluid NSE and fever. Conclusion The model established with the combination of CEA and ADA in the pleural fluid has a high differential diagnostic value for malignant pleural effusion and tuberculous pleural effusion, and NSE in the pleural fluid and fever cannot improve the diagnostic efficacy of the diagnostic model.

Proteome analysis of malignant pleural effusion

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22194-e22194
Author(s):  
K. Lee ◽  
J. Bang ◽  
K. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Malignant Pleural Effusion ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
Proteome Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Complement Factor ◽  
Glycoprotein Precursor ◽  
Tuberculous Pleural Effusion ◽  
Potential Biomarker

e22194 Background: Because pleural effusion contains proteins of potential diagnostic value, a comprehensive proteomic analysis of the pleural effusion is worthy to discover a new biomarker. Malignant pleural effusion and tuberculous pleural effusion are sometimes diagnositc challenge due to their similarity like lymphocyte-dominant effusion. Herein, we tried to identify differentially expressed proteins in both effusion using proteomic anlaysis. Methods: Twenty microliters of pleural effusions(PEs) from 3 patients with non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) and 3 patients with tuberculous pleurisy(TBC) were used for proteome analysis. After depletion of high abundant proteins including albumin, IgG with MARS Hu-6(Agilent), proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and subject to in-gel tryptic digestion. The resulting peptides were analyzed by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). The MS/MS spectra were analyzed by Spectrum Mill against normal and reversed human protein databases. Results: In the total of 6 samples, 90 proteins were identified with more than 2 peptides and less than 1% of false positive rate. Among the identified pleural proteins, 57 proteins were detected both in PEs of NSCLS and TBC, 19 and 14 proteins were identified only in the PE of NSCLC and TBC, respectively. We analysed molecular functions, molecular composition and molecular processes of identified proteins with FindGo software. Among the identified proteins, we found the biomarker candidates that significantly have different expression levels in malignant effusion; apolipoprotein B precursor, vitronectin, complement factor B, histidine-rich glycoprotein precursor, coagulation factor II precursor variant. Conclusions: We found that several pleural effusion proteins may serve as potential biomarker candidates for differential diagnosis between maligant and tuberculous pleural effusion. We'll confirm these proteins through the proteomic method(MRM) and immunological method(Western bolt). No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Potential diagnostic value of pleural fluid cytokines levels for tuberculous pleural effusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neda Dalil Roofchayee ◽  
Majid Marjani ◽  
Neda K. Dezfuli ◽  
Payam Tabarsi ◽  
Afshin Moniri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Parapneumonic Effusion ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Tuberculous Pleural Effusion ◽  
New Biomarkers ◽  
High Level

AbstractPatients with tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) or malignant pleural effusions (MPE) frequently have similar pleural fluid profiles. New biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of TPE are required. We determined whether cytokine profiles in the PE of patients could aid the differential diagnosis of TPE. 30 patients with TPE, 30 patients with MPE, 14 patients with empyema (EMP) and 14 patients with parapneumonic effusion (PPE) were enrolled between Dec 2018 and 2019. The levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-18, IL-27, CXCL8, CCL-1 and IP-10 were determined in PE by ELISA along with measurements of adenosine deaminase (ADA). The best predictors of TPE were combined ADA.IL-27 [optimal cut-off value = 42.68 (103 U ng/l2), sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.28%], ADA [cut off value 27.5 (IU/l), sensitivity 90%, specificity 96.5%] and IL-27 [cut-off value = 2363 (pg/ml), sensitivity 96.7%, specificity 98.3%, p ≤ 0.0001]. A high level of IL-6 [cut-off value = 3260 (pg/ml), sensitivity 100%, specificity 67.2%], CXCL8 [cut-off value = 144.5 (pg/ml), sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 58.6%], CCL1 [cut-off value = 54 (pg/ml), sensitivity 100%, specificity 70.7%] and IP-10 [cut-off value = 891.9 (pg/ml), sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 48.3%] were also predictive of TPE. High ADA.IL-27, ADA and IL-27 levels differentiate between TPE and non-TPE with improved specificity and diagnostic accuracy and may be useful clinically.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document