Utilizing Integrated Technology to Develop Leading Indicators and Improve Process Safety Management

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Alexander Neill ◽  
Scott Lehmann
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 651
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Wilson ◽  
Gerard G. Ransom

In late 2014, Woodside commenced the implementation of the Energy Institute Process Safety Management (PSM) Framework to transform how process safety is managed in the organisation. The framework consists of four focus areas and 20 elements which formed a structure around which a cultural change to a ‘line led, risk based’ approach was made. The transformation focused on four key improvement opportunities: (i) consistent multi-disciplined risk assessments, (ii) efficient management of safety critical devices, (iii) better recognition of excursions beyond integrity limits and (iv) lift and formalise the capability of people to lead and deliver superior process safety performance. The first three focused on tools and methodologies – the PSM ‘system’. The capability workstream considered the people aspect of process safety, so that people understand and are able to execute their role in the overall process safety effort. This paper discusses the capability workstream in Woodside’s PSM Initiative, the ‘how’ of establishing process safety critical roles and implementing cultural change. It then discusses the demonstrable improvements and reduction in risk that were realised and measured, using lagging indicators (Tier 1 and 2 events) and a suite of leading indicators.


2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
C. R. Che Hassan ◽  
M. J. Pitt ◽  
A. J. Wilday

The development of the audit method has included the identification of possible performance indicators at each level of the sociotechnical pyramid for a range of areas of work in which accidents have been shown to occur most frequently. The measurementof performance indicators is part of a feedback loop which causes safety improvements. Integration of performance indicators into the audit system has been tested at three operating chemical industries in Terengganu and Selangor in Malaysia. A summary of the weaknesses of the similar elements identified in the three audited plants is presented. Analysis on the approach used enables the identification of deficiencies in safety management aspects. Keywords: Accidents, audit, deficiencies, performance indicators, safety management, and sociotechnical pyramid.


Author(s):  
Sang-Guk Kang ◽  
Kuao-John Young

For process safety management purposes, it is often required in industries to perform burst pressure calculations for pressurized equipment subjected to internal deflagrations. In predictions of burst pressures of vessels with short cylindrical shell sections, the stiffening effects of heads are often overlooked, which may lead to underestimated results. In this paper, a new improved method is proposed for predictions of burst pressures of thin cylindrical shells with small shell length to diameter ratios (L/D) at ambient temperature. The idea is to use the Svensson’s formula, modified by a factor that accounts for the effects of small L/D ratios, head types, and materials for more accurate predictions. Tables of such factors are developed based on study results from a series of elastic-plastic Finite Element Analyses including large displacement effect for different L/D ratios, thicknesses, materials, and head types. Some example problems are presented to validate the method.


Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1695
Author(s):  
Guangpei Cong ◽  
Duhui Lu ◽  
Mei Liu ◽  
Qi Wang ◽  
Wei Yu

Traditional hazard and operability analysis (HAZOP) is one of the most widely applied methods for process safety management in process enterprises. Due to its principles based on the conservative and qualitative judgment, it often leads to too conservative risk identification results for the fluorine chemical industry usually with high-risk processes to keep the continuity of production. Most of improved quantitative and semi-quantitative methods are based on the layer of protection analysis (LOPA) to resolve the over-conservative problem of traditional HAZOP with the database of LOPA. However, the improved model, taking LOPA as the main line and HAZOP only as the provider of scenarios and influencing factors, is limited to the fact that LOPA can only analyze complete and independent protection layers (IPLs). Therefore, in order to realize the quantitative or semi-quantitative analysis of disaster causes and consequences, a new semi-quantitative HAZOP method takes HAZOP as the main line to integrate LOPA, F&EI (fire and explosion index) for quantitatively calculating the reduction factors, probability on failure demand (PFD) of general protection layers (GPLs) and PFD of IPLs. With the case comparison of fluorine chemical industry, it is proved that this new method can effectively improve the problem that traditional HAZOP are too conservative in complex scenarios.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document