Evaluating the Probability of Power Loss in Ship Electric Propulsion Systems Based on Bayesian Belief Networks

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 63-79
Author(s):  
Wenfen Zhang ◽  
Xinping Yan ◽  
Di Zhang ◽  
Jinfen Zhang

AbstractThe development of smart and green ships has led to the wide use of electric propulsion systems, creating many safety problems. The ship electric propulsion system (SEPS) loses power frequently, creating significant risk in maritime transportation. This article proposed a probability evaluation method to assess SEPS power loss, based on Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs). The BBN structure of power loss in a SEPS is considered the main component causing SEPS disruption. The prior probability and conditional probability tables of the model were generated using statistical data and expert judgment. A case study was conducted to illustrate the proposed model. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was used to identify several key indicators, including human factors, navigation conditions, winding failure, aging, and parameter setting. Compared with related research, the proposed method is rational and effective. As such, the method presented in this article provides a practical and flexible way to evaluate the probability of power loss in a SEPS. The model enables the safety manager to discover key influencing factors and components during ship operations, providing effective ways to reduce ship power loss.

Risk Analysis ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1171-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinfen Zhang ◽  
Ângelo P Teixeira ◽  
C. Guedes Soares ◽  
Xinping Yan ◽  
Kezhong Liu

2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 95-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.N. Barton ◽  
T. Saloranta ◽  
T.H. Bakken ◽  
A. Lyche Solheim ◽  
J. Moe ◽  
...  

The evaluation of water bodies “at risk” of not achieving the Water Framework Directive's (WFD) goal of “good status” begs the question of how big a risk is acceptable before a programme of measures should be implemented. Documentation of expert judgement and statistical uncertainty in pollution budgets and water quality modelling, combined with Monte Carlo simulation and Bayesian belief networks, make it possible to give a probabilistic interpretation of “at risk”. Combined with information on abatement costs, a cost-effective ranking of measures based on expected costs and effect can be undertaken. Combined with economic valuation of water quality, the definition of “disproportionate cost” of abatement measures compared to benefits of achieving “good status” can also be given a probabilistic interpretation. Explicit modelling of uncertainty helps visualize where research and consulting efforts are most critical for reducing uncertainty. Based on data from the Morsa catchment in South-Eastern Norway, this paper discusses the relative merits of using Bayesian belief networks when integrating biophysical modelling results in the benefit-cost analysis of derogations and cost-effectiveness ranking of abatement measures under the WFD.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. Karimi ◽  
Jim A. Harris ◽  
Ron Corstanje

Abstract Context Landscape connectivity is assumed to influence ecosystem service (ES) trade-offs and synergies. However, empirical studies of the effect of landscape connectivity on ES trade-offs and synergies are limited, especially in urban areas where the interactions between patterns and processes are complex. Objectives The objectives of this study were to use a Bayesian Belief Network approach to (1) assess whether functional connectivity drives ES trade-offs and synergies in urban areas and (2) assess the influence of connectivity on the supply of ESs. Methods We used circuit theory to model urban bird flow of P. major and C. caeruleus at a 2 m spatial resolution in Bedford, Luton and Milton Keynes, UK, and Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) to assess the sensitivity of ES trade-offs and synergies model outputs to landscape and patch structural characteristics (patch area, connectivity and bird species abundance). Results We found that functional connectivity was the most influential variable in determining two of three ES trade-offs and synergies. Patch area and connectivity exerted a strong influence on ES trade-offs and synergies. Low patch area and low to moderately low connectivity were associated with high levels of ES trade-offs and synergies. Conclusions This study demonstrates that landscape connectivity is an influential determinant of ES trade-offs and synergies and supports the conviction that larger and better-connected habitat patches increase ES provision. A BBN approach is proposed as a feasible method of ES trade-off and synergy prediction in complex landscapes. Our findings can prove to be informative for urban ES management.


1989 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 534-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Sovey ◽  
Lynnette M. Carney ◽  
Steven C. Knowles

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document