Sliding Stability of Retaining Wall Supporting c-Φ Backfill under Pseudo-Statically Seismic Active Load

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Sima Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Factor Of Safety ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Dynamic Factor ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Seismic Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Wedge Surface ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Sliding Stability

The sliding stability of retaining wall is one of the four important stability criteria for the safe design of retaining wall. Here an attempt is made to determine the sliding stability of retaining wall under seismic loading condition supporting c- F backfill considering both soil and wall inertia using pseudo-static method. The analysis for seismic active earth pressure for that particular study is done in such a way to develop a single critical wedge surface which is more realistic. The effect of wide range of variation of parameters like angle of internal friction of soil, angle of wall friction, cohesion, adhesion, seismic acceleration are studied on normalized seismic active earth pressure variation, wall inertia factor, thrust factor, combined dynamic factor and dynamic factor of safety against sliding. Results are presented in terms of formula for critical wedge surface and seismic active earth pressure and non-dimensional charts for the variation of different factors. Finally, a failure zone against sliding is recommended in the Factor of safety against sliding charts.

scholarly journals Effect of Wall Inclination on Dynamic Active Thrust for Cohesive Soil Backfill

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gupta ◽  
V. Yadav ◽  
V. A. Sawant ◽  
R. Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Cohesive Soil ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Cohesionless Soil ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Seismic Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Design Charts ◽  
Seismic Loadings

Design of retaining walls under seismic conditions is based on the calculation of seismic earth pressurebehind the wall. To calculate the seismic active earth pressure behind the vertical retaining wall, many researchers reportanalytical solutions using the pseudo-static approach for both cohesionless and cohesive soil backfill. Design charts havebeen presented for the calculation of seismic active earth pressure behind vertical retaining walls in the non-dimensionalform. For inclined retaining walls, the analytical solutions for the calculation of seismic active earth pressure as well as thedesign charts (in non-dimensional form) have been reported in few studies for c-ϕ soil backfill. One analytical solution forthe calculation of seismic active earth pressure behind inclined retaining walls by Shukla (2015) is used in the present studyto obtain the design charts in non-dimensional form. Different field parameters related with wall geometry, seismic loadings,tension cracks, soil backfill properties, surcharge and wall friction are used in the present analysis. The present study hasquantified the effect of negative and positive wall inclination as well as the effect of soil cohesion (c), angle of shearingresistance (ϕ), surcharge loading (q) and the horizontal and vertical seismic coefficient (kh and kv) on seismic active earthpressure with the help of design charts for c-ϕ soil backfill. The design charts presented here in non-dimensional form aresimple to use and can be implemented by field engineers for design of inclined retaining walls under seismic conditions. Theactive earth pressure coefficients for cohesionless soil backfill achieved from the present study are validated with studiesreported in the literature.

Seismic active earth pressure behind a nonvertical retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyanka Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Analysis ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Failure Surface ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Nonlinear Variation ◽  
Seismic Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Planar Failure

This note describes a study on the seismic active earth pressure behind a nonvertical cantilever retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis. A planar failure surface has been considered behind the retaining wall. The effects of soil friction angle, wall inclination, wall friction angle, amplification of vibration, and horizontal and vertical earthquake acceleration on the active earth pressure have been explored in this study. Unlike the Mononobe–Okabe method, which incorporates pseudo-static analysis, the present analysis predicts a nonlinear variation of active earth pressure along the wall. The results have been compared with the existing values in the literature.

Pseudo-Dynamic Active Earth Pressure on Battered Face Retaining Wall Supporting c-Φ Backfill Considering Curvilinear Rupture Surface

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-57
Author(s):  
Sima Ghosh ◽  
Arijit Saha
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Pressure Coefficient ◽  
Wedge Angle ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Horizontal Shear ◽  
Rupture Surface ◽  
Wide Range

In the present analysis, using the horizontal slice method and D'Alembert's principle, a methodology is suggested to calculate the pseudo-dynamic active earth pressure on battered face retaining wall supporting cohesive-frictional backfill. Results are presented in tabular form. The analysis provides a curvilinear rupture surface depending on the wall-backfill parameters. Effects of a wide range of variation of parameters like wall inclination angle (a), wall friction angle (d), soil friction angle (F), shear wave velocity (Vs), primary wave velocity (Vp), horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations (kh, kv) along with horizontal shear and vertical loads and non-linear wedge angle on the seismic active earth pressure coefficient have been studied.

Formulation of Seismic Passive Resistance of Retaining Wall Backfilled with c-F Soil

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sima Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Pressure Coefficient ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Unit Weight ◽  
Passive Resistance ◽  
Angle Of Internal Friction ◽  
Variation Of Parameters ◽  
Wide Range

Knowledge of passive resistance is extremely important and it is the basic data required for the design of geotechnical structures like the retaining wall moving towards the backfill, the foundations, the anchors etc. An attempt is made to develop a formulation for the evolution of seismic passive resistance of a retaining wall supporting c-F backfill using pseudo-static method. Considering a planar rupture surface, the formulation is developed in such a way so that a single critical wedge surface is generated. The variation of seismic passive earth pressure coefficient are studied for wide range of variation of parameters like angle of internal friction, angle of wall friction, cohesion, adhesion, surcharge, unit weight of the backfill material, height and seismic coefficients.

Calculating Method of Active Earth Pressure behind Rigid Retaining Wall Based on Pseudo-Dynamic Theory

2011 ◽  
Vol 368-373 ◽  
pp. 2932-2938
Author(s):  
Kui Hua Wang ◽  
Deng Hui Wu ◽  
Shao Jun Ma ◽  
Wen Bing Wu
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Analysis ◽  
Dynamic Theory ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Active Force ◽  
Calculating Method ◽  
Seismic Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Action Point ◽  
Seismic Force

By means of pseudo-dynamic theory, a new calculating method is presented to calculate the pseudo-dynamic seismic active earth pressure behind rigid retaining wall. Considering time and phase difference within the backfills, the horizontal slices is used to analyze the distribution of seismic active force behind retaining wall in more realistic manner. Under the assumption that the soil backfills are rigid body, the equations derived in this paper can be degenerated to Mononobe-Okabe equations. Through numerical analysis, it is shown that the values of seismic active force obtained from present study are smaller than those obtained from Mononobe-Okabe theory and the distribution of seismic force along the depth of the wall is nonlinear. It is also found that the action point of the total seismic active earth pressure is higher than one third of the wall height, which is corresponding to previous experimental results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document