Seismic active earth pressure behind a nonvertical retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyanka Ghosh

This note describes a study on the seismic active earth pressure behind a nonvertical cantilever retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis. A planar failure surface has been considered behind the retaining wall. The effects of soil friction angle, wall inclination, wall friction angle, amplification of vibration, and horizontal and vertical earthquake acceleration on the active earth pressure have been explored in this study. Unlike the Mononobe–Okabe method, which incorporates pseudo-static analysis, the present analysis predicts a nonlinear variation of active earth pressure along the wall. The results have been compared with the existing values in the literature.

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gupta ◽  
V. Yadav ◽  
V. A. Sawant ◽  
R. Agarwal

Design of retaining walls under seismic conditions is based on the calculation of seismic earth pressurebehind the wall. To calculate the seismic active earth pressure behind the vertical retaining wall, many researchers reportanalytical solutions using the pseudo-static approach for both cohesionless and cohesive soil backfill. Design charts havebeen presented for the calculation of seismic active earth pressure behind vertical retaining walls in the non-dimensionalform. For inclined retaining walls, the analytical solutions for the calculation of seismic active earth pressure as well as thedesign charts (in non-dimensional form) have been reported in few studies for c-ϕ soil backfill. One analytical solution forthe calculation of seismic active earth pressure behind inclined retaining walls by Shukla (2015) is used in the present studyto obtain the design charts in non-dimensional form. Different field parameters related with wall geometry, seismic loadings,tension cracks, soil backfill properties, surcharge and wall friction are used in the present analysis. The present study hasquantified the effect of negative and positive wall inclination as well as the effect of soil cohesion (c), angle of shearingresistance (ϕ), surcharge loading (q) and the horizontal and vertical seismic coefficient (kh and kv) on seismic active earthpressure with the help of design charts for c-ϕ soil backfill. The design charts presented here in non-dimensional form aresimple to use and can be implemented by field engineers for design of inclined retaining walls under seismic conditions. Theactive earth pressure coefficients for cohesionless soil backfill achieved from the present study are validated with studiesreported in the literature.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Zheng-zhen Wang ◽  
Rang-cheng Kou ◽  
Yong Zhou ◽  
Tian-zhong Ma

At present, most seismic earth pressure theories have the limitations of complex derivation process and difficult solution. To solve these problems, considering the deflection of small principal stress caused by soil arching effect, the central arc soil arch was approximated to two inclined linear soil arches, which can greatly simplify the derivation process. Firstly, by improving the combination of differential thin-layer element method and pseudostatic method, the theoretical formulas of seismic active earth pressure intensity, resultant force size, and resultant force action point under translation mode (T mode) were derived and were verified by experimental results. Then, the influence of soil internal friction angle, wall-soil friction angle, and seismic coefficient on seismic active earth pressure theory was analyzed. The results show that the seismic active earth pressure is nonlinearly distributed, and the seismic horizontal coefficient has a greater influence than other influence factors. The theoretical results can provide reference for the seismic design of retaining wall.


Author(s):  
Sima Ghosh

The sliding stability of retaining wall is one of the four important stability criteria for the safe design of retaining wall. Here an attempt is made to determine the sliding stability of retaining wall under seismic loading condition supporting c- F backfill considering both soil and wall inertia using pseudo-static method. The analysis for seismic active earth pressure for that particular study is done in such a way to develop a single critical wedge surface which is more realistic. The effect of wide range of variation of parameters like angle of internal friction of soil, angle of wall friction, cohesion, adhesion, seismic acceleration are studied on normalized seismic active earth pressure variation, wall inertia factor, thrust factor, combined dynamic factor and dynamic factor of safety against sliding. Results are presented in terms of formula for critical wedge surface and seismic active earth pressure and non-dimensional charts for the variation of different factors. Finally, a failure zone against sliding is recommended in the Factor of safety against sliding charts.


2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 651-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pérsio L.A. Barros ◽  
Petrucio J. Santos

A calculation method for the active earth pressure on the possibly inclined face of a retaining wall provided with a drainage system along the soil–structure interface is presented. The soil is cohesionless and fully saturated to the ground surface. This situation may arise during heavy rainstorms. To solve the problem, the water seepage through the soil is first analyzed using a numerical procedure based on the boundary element method. Then, the obtained pore-water pressure is used in a Coulomb-type formulation, which supposes a plane failure surface inside the backfill when the wall movement is enough to put the soil mass in the active state. The formulation provides coefficients of active pressure with seepage effect which can be used to evaluate the active earth thrust on walls of any height. A series of charts with values of the coefficients of active earth pressure with seepage calculated for selected values of the soil internal friction angle, the wall–soil friction angle, and the wall face inclination is presented.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-57
Author(s):  
Sima Ghosh ◽  
Arijit Saha

In the present analysis, using the horizontal slice method and D'Alembert's principle, a methodology is suggested to calculate the pseudo-dynamic active earth pressure on battered face retaining wall supporting cohesive-frictional backfill. Results are presented in tabular form. The analysis provides a curvilinear rupture surface depending on the wall-backfill parameters. Effects of a wide range of variation of parameters like wall inclination angle (a), wall friction angle (d), soil friction angle (F), shear wave velocity (Vs), primary wave velocity (Vp), horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations (kh, kv) along with horizontal shear and vertical loads and non-linear wedge angle on the seismic active earth pressure coefficient have been studied.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sima Ghosh

Knowledge of passive resistance is extremely important and it is the basic data required for the design of geotechnical structures like the retaining wall moving towards the backfill, the foundations, the anchors etc. An attempt is made to develop a formulation for the evolution of seismic passive resistance of a retaining wall supporting c-F backfill using pseudo-static method. Considering a planar rupture surface, the formulation is developed in such a way so that a single critical wedge surface is generated. The variation of seismic passive earth pressure coefficient are studied for wide range of variation of parameters like angle of internal friction, angle of wall friction, cohesion, adhesion, surcharge, unit weight of the backfill material, height and seismic coefficients.


2000 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirmala Gnanapragasam

An analytical solution is developed to determine the active lateral earth pressure distribution on a retaining structure when it consists of a cohesive backfill (internal friction angle ϕ > 0, cohesion c > 0) with an inclined ground surface. The solution derived encompasses both Bell's equation (for cohesive or cohesionless backfill with a horizontal ground surface) and Rankine's solution (for cohesionless backfill with an inclined ground surface). The orientation of the failure surface is also determined. Results indicate that, unlike the soil-wall scenarios of Bell and Rankine where the failure planes are parallel with a fixed orientation independent of the overburden pressure, for sloping cohesive backfill (ϕ > 0, c > 0) the slope of the failure surface is a function of the overburden pressure and becomes shallower with depth, thus forming a curvilinear failure surface. The solution developed can also be used to check the sustainability of a slope. The analytical solution can be programmed conveniently in a computer.Key words: retaining structure, active earth pressure, cohesive backfill.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document