A Novel Method to Assign Weights to Decision Makers for each Criterion in Group Decision Making Under Multiple Criteria with Crisp and Interval Data

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Azadfallah
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Interval Data ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Optimal Weights ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
Negative Ideal Solution ◽  
Individual Group Member

This article focuses on determining the weights of decision makers (DMs) in multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) environments with both crisp and interval data, in which the weights of DMs are derived from the decision matrices and DMs, have different weights for different criteria. In order to determine the optimal weights of DMs for each criterion, a new TOPSIS-based approach is introduced. In the proposed method, the DMs weight for each criterion is depends on the distances from each individual group member decision to the positive and negative ideal solution. In other words, the DM has a large weight if his/ her decision information is close (far) to the positive (negative) ideal solution, and has a small weight if his/ her decision information is far (close) from the positive (negative) ideal solution. Finally, a numerical example is given to demonstrate the feasibility of the developed methods.

scholarly journals Hybrid Multiattribute Group Decision Making Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information and GRA Method

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Guo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Decision Matrix ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Entropy ◽  
Fuzzy Group Decision Making

Hybrid multiple attribute group decision making involves ranking and selecting competing courses of action available using attributes to evaluate the alternatives. The decision makers assessment information can be expressed in the form of real number, interval-valued number, linguistic variable, and the intuitionistic fuzzy number. All these evaluation information can be transformed to the form of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. A combined GRA with intuitionistic fuzzy group decision-making approach is proposed. Firstly, the hybrid decision matrix is standardized and then transformed into an intuitionistic fuzzy decision matrix. Then, intuitionistic fuzzy averaging operator is utilized to aggregate opinions of decision makers. Intuitionistic fuzzy entropy is utilized to obtain the entropy weights of the criteria, respectively. After intuitionistic fuzzy positive ideal solution and intuitionistic fuzzy negative ideal solution are calculated, the grey relative relational degree of alternatives is obtained and alternatives are ranked. In the end, a numerical example illustrates the validity and applicability of the proposed method.

scholarly journals A Novel Extension of the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Method with Objective Criteria Weights for Group Decision Making with Interval Numbers

Entropy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1460
Author(s):  
Dariusz Kacprzak
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Interval Numbers ◽  
Group Matrix ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Criteria Weights

This paper presents an extension of the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method with objective criteria weights for Group Decision Making (GDM) with Interval Numbers (INs). The proposed method is an alternative to popular and often used methods that aggregate the decision matrices provided by the decision makers (DMs) into a single group matrix, which is the basis for determining objective criteria weights and ranking the alternatives. It does not use an aggregation operator, but a transformation of the decision matrices into criteria matrices, in the case of determining objective criteria weights, and into alternative matrices, in the case of the ranking of alternatives. This ensures that all the decision makers’ evaluations are taken into account instead of their certain average. The numerical example shows the ease of use of the proposed method, which can be implemented into common data analysis software such as Excel.

A Novel Method for Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 497-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meimei Xia ◽  
Zeshui Xu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Weight Vector ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Decision Matrix ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Ideal Group ◽  
The Ideal

To determine the weight vector and to aggregate the individual opinions are necessary steps in the classical methods for multi-criteria group decision-making problems in which the weight vectors of the decision makers and the criteria are incompletely known. In this paper, we propose a simple but efficient approach which can avoid these steps by establishing some optimal models. To get the optimal group decision matrix, we first propose two kinds of models among which the former focuses on minimizing the deviations between individual decision matrix and the ideal group one, while the latter aims at minimizing the deviations between the estimated group opinion and the ideal group one. To get the overall performances of alternatives, another two types of models are further established, one of which is to minimize the distance between the evaluation value under each criterion and the ideal overall value for each alternative, and the other is to minimize the distance between the estimated overall value and the ideal overall one. The proposed models can be used to deal with group decision-making under intuitionistic fuzzy, interval-valued fuzzy or other fuzzy environments, and can also provide the decision makers more choices by containing the parameter which can be assigned different values according to different actual situations. Several examples illustrate the practicability of the proposed methods.

Extension of the TOPSIS for Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making under Atanassov IFS Environments

2013 ◽  
pp. 241-255
Author(s):  
Deng-Feng Li ◽  
Jiang-Xia Nan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Maker ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Distance Measure ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Euclidean Distance Measure ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Negative Ideal Solution

This paper extends the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) for solving multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems under Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) environments. In this methodology, weights of attributes and ratings of alternatives on attributes are extracted from fuzziness inherent in decision data and making process and described using Atanassov IFSs. An Euclidean distance measure is developed to calculate the differences between alternatives for each decision maker and an Atanassov IFS positive ideal solution (IFSPIS) as well as an Atanassov IFS negative ideal-solution (IFSNIS). Degrees of relative closeness to the Atanassov IFSPIS for all alternatives with respect to each decision maker in the group are calculated. Then all decision makers in the group may be regarded as “attributes” and a corresponding classical MADM problem is generated and hereby solved by the TOPSIS. The proposed methodology is validated and compared with other similar methods. A numerical example is examined to demonstrate the implementation process of the methodology proposed in this paper.

ON COMPATIBILITY OF UNCERTAIN MULTIPLICATIVE LINGUISTIC PREFERENCE RELATIONS AND ITS APPLICATION TO GROUP DECISION MAKING

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (01) ◽  
pp. 9-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
LIGANG ZHOU ◽  
HUAYOU CHEN
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Preference Relation ◽  
Scientific Basis ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Preference Relations ◽  
Compatibility Index ◽  
Optimal Weights ◽  
Linguistic Preference Relation

The aim of this work is to develop a new compatibility for the uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations and determine the optimal weights of decision makers (DMs), which are very suitable to deal with group decision making (GDM) problems involving uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations. First, the concepts of compatibility degree and compatibility index for the two uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations are proposed. Then we prove the property that the synthetic uncertain linguistic preference relation is of acceptable compatibility under the condition that uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations given by DMs are all of acceptable compatibility with a specific linguistic preference relation, which is the scientific basis of using the uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations in the GDM. Next, in order to determine the weights of decision makers, we construct an optimal model based on the criterion of minimizing the compatibility index. Finally, we develop an application of the optimal weights approach compared with the equal weights approach where we analyze a GDM regarding the selection of investment.

scholarly journals A Consensus Reaching Model with Minimum Adjustments in Interval-Valued Intuitionistic MAGDM

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gai-li Xu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Decision Matrix ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
Consensus Index ◽  
Interval Valued ◽  
Consensus Reaching

This paper focuses on multiattribute group decision-making problems with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values (IVIFVs) and develops a consensus reaching model with minimum adjustments to improve the consensus among decision-makers (DMs). To check the consensus, a consensus index is introduced by measuring the distance between each decision matrix and the collective one. For the group decision-making with unacceptable consensus, Consensus Rule 1 and Consensus Rule 2 are, respectively, proposed by minimizing adjustment amounts of individual decision matrices. According to these two consensus rules, two algorithms are devised to help DMs reach acceptable consensus. Moreover, the convergences of algorithms are proved. To determine weights of attributes, an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy program is constructed by maximizing comprehensive values of alternatives. Finally, alternatives are ranked based on their comprehensive values. Thereby, a novel method is proposed to solve MAGDM with IVIFVs. At length, a numerical example is examined to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

A New Entropy-Based Approach to Determine the Weights of Decision Makers for Each Criterion With Crisp and Interval Data in Group Decision Making Under Multiple Attribute

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 37-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Azadfallah
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Interval Data ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Uncertainty Measure ◽  
Numerical Example ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Entropy Measures

The aim of this article is to develop a modified version of the original entropy approach to determine weights of decision makers (DMs) in multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) contexts with both crisp and interval data, in which the weights of experts (or DMs) are derived from the decision matrices and DMs have different weights for different criteria. In the proposed method, the experts' weight for each criterion depends on the uncertainty measure of DMs comparisons. In other words, the DMs who give less uncertainty judgments (or less entropy measures), will be evaluated as more importance, and vice-versa. Finally, a numerical example is given to demonstrate the feasibility of the developed method.

CPT-MABAC method for spherical fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making and its application to green supplier selection

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Huiyuan Zhang ◽  
Guiwu Wei ◽  
Xudong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Comparison Method ◽  
Entropy Method ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Green Supplier Selection ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Psychological Perceptions

The green supplier selection is one of the popular multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems. The spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs) can fully express the complexity and fuzziness of evaluation information for green supplier selection. Furthermore, the classic MABAC (multi-attributive border approximation area comparison) method based on the cumulative prospect theory (CPT-MABAC) is designed, which is an optional method in reflecting the psychological perceptions of decision makers (DMs). Therefore, in this article, we propose a spherical fuzzy CPT-MABAC (SF-CPT-MABAC) method for MAGDM issues. Meanwhile, considering the different preferences of DMs to attribute sets, we obtain the objective weights of attributes through entropy method. Focusing on the current popular problems, this paper applies the proposed method for green supplier selection and proves for green supplier selection based on SF-CPT-MABAC method. Finally, by comparing existing methods, the effectiveness of the proposed method is certified.

Method for Selecting Storage Enterprises Based on IFHA

2015 ◽  
Vol 713-715 ◽  
pp. 1769-1772
Author(s):  
Jie Wu ◽  
Lei Na Zheng ◽  
Tie Jun Pan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Decision Problems ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Multiple Decision Makers ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy ◽  
Averaging Operator

In order to reflect the decision-making more scientific and democratic, modern decision problems often require the participation of multiple decision makers. In group decision making process,require the use of intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid averaging operator (IFHA) to get the final decision result.

scholarly journals Some q-Rung Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Heronian Mean Operators with Their Application to Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making

Symmetry ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Xu ◽  
Xiaopu Shang ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Wen Wu ◽  
Huiqun Huang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Hesitant Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
A New Technique ◽  
Supplier Selection Problem ◽  
Heronian Mean

The q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets (q-ROFSs), originated by Yager, are good tools to describe fuzziness in human cognitive processes. The basic elements of q-ROFSs are q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers (q-ROFNs), which are constructed by membership and nonmembership degrees. As realistic decision-making is very complicated, decision makers (DMs) may be hesitant among several values when determining membership and nonmembership degrees. By incorporating dual hesitant fuzzy sets (DHFSs) into q-ROFSs, we propose a new technique to deal with uncertainty, called q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy sets (q-RDHFSs). Subsequently, we propose a family of q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy Heronian mean operators for q-RDHFSs. Further, the newly developed aggregation operators are utilized in multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM). We used the proposed method to solve a most suitable supplier selection problem to demonstrate its effectiveness and usefulness. The merits and advantages of the proposed method are highlighted via comparison with existing MAGDM methods. The main contribution of this paper is that a new method for MAGDM is proposed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document