scholarly journals Retraction: Fluoride release and recharge abilities of contemporary fluoridecontaining restorative materials and dental adhesives

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 410-410
Author(s):  
Dimitrios DIONYSOPOULOS ◽  
Eugenia KOLINIOTOU-KOUMPIA ◽  
Maria HELVATZOGLOU-ANTONIADES ◽  
Nikolaos KOTSANOS
Keyword(s):  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Dental Adhesives ◽  
Restorative Materials

scholarly journals Fluoride release and recharge abilities of contemporary fluoride-containing restorative materials and dental adhesives

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios DIONYSOPOULOS ◽  
Eugenia KOLINIOTOU-KOUMPIA ◽  
Maria HELVATZOGLOU-ANTONIADES ◽  
Nikolaos KOTSANOS
Keyword(s):  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Dental Adhesives ◽  
Restorative Materials

scholarly journals Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials: The Effect of a Resinous Coat on Ion Release

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-381
Author(s):  
Katarina Kelić ◽  
Matej Par ◽  
Kristina Peroš ◽  
Ivana Šutej ◽  
Zrinka Tarle
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Ion Release ◽  
Dental Adhesives ◽  
Ph Changes ◽  
Ph Values ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Objective: To determine the effect of two adhesive systems and a glass ionomer coating resin on fluoride release and concurrent pH changes over a period of 168 days. Material and methods: Four restorative materials were investigated: a giomer Beautiful II, an “alkasite” material Cention, a conventional composite Filtek Z250, and a glass ionomer cement Fuji IX Extra. Light-cured composite specimens were coated using G-aenial Bond and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick. Glass ionomer specimens were coated using GC Fuji Coat LC. Uncoated specimens were used as references. Quantitative fluoride release and pH changes were measured after 1 h, 24 h, 2 days, 7 days, 28 days, 84 days, and 168 days. Results: The cumulative fluoride release after 168 days increased for uncoated specimens in the following order: Filtek Z250 < Beautifil II < Cention < Fuji IX Extra. A comparatively lower fluoride release was measured for the composites coated with Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, with cumulative values after 168 days increasing in the following order: Filtek Z250 < Beautifil II < Cention. The composites coated with G-aenial Bond showed lower fluoride release compared to the uncoated specimens, with cumulative values increasing in the following order: Filtek Z250 < Beautifil II < Cention. The composites coated with G-aenial Bond showed pH values in the acidic range (4.4- 5.7) after 1 h and 24 h. Conclusion: Fluoride release varied among the investigated restorative materials and depended on the use of dental adhesives and coatings. The pH of all materials, coating types and time points varied.

Fluoride release for restorative materials and its effect on biofilm formation in natural saliva

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 1243-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar T. Al-Naimi ◽  
Toshiyuki Itota ◽  
Ross S. Hobson ◽  
John F. McCabe
Keyword(s):  
Biofilm Formation ◽  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Restorative Materials

scholarly journals Microhardness and fluoride release of restorative materials in different storage media

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kélio Garcia Silva ◽  
Denise Pedrini ◽  
Alberto Carlos Botazzo Delbem ◽  
Mark Cannon
Keyword(s):  
Static Load ◽  
Initial Surface ◽  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Storage Medium ◽  
Surface Microhardness ◽  
Storage Media ◽  
All Solutions ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Ph Cycling

This study evaluated the surface microhardness and fluoride release of 5 restorative materials - Ketac-Fil Plus, Vitremer, Fuji II LC, Freedom and Fluorofil - in two storage media: distilled/deionized water and a pH-cycling (pH 4.6). Twelve specimens of each material, were fabricated and the initial surface microhardness (ISM) was determined in a Shimadzu HMV-2000 microhardness tester (static load Knoop). The specimens were submitted to 6- or 18-h cycles in the tested media. The solutions were refreshed at the end of each cycle. All solutions were stored for further analysis. After 15-day storage, the final surface microhardness (FSM) and fluoride release were measured. Fluoride dose was measured with a fluoride-specific electrode (Orion 9609-BN) and digital ion analyzer (Orion 720 A). The variables ISM, FSM and fluoride release were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance and Tukey's test (p<0.05). There was significant difference in FSM between the storage media for Vitremer (pH 4.6 = 40.2 ± 1.5; water = 42.6 ± 1.4), Ketac-Fil Plus (pH 4.6 = 73.4 ± 2.7; water = 58.2 ± 1.3) and Fluorofil (pH 4.6 = 44.3 ± 1.8; water = 38.4 ± 1.0). Ketac-Fil Plus (9.9 ± 18.0) and Fluorofil (4.4 ± 1.3) presented higher fluoride release in water, whereas Vitremer (7.4 ± 7.1), Fuji II LC (5.7 ± 4.7) and Freedom (2.1 ± 1.7) had higher fluoride release at pH 4.6. Microhardness and fluoride release of the tested restorative materials varied according to the storage medium.

scholarly journals Fluoride release of six restorative materials in water and pH-cycling solutions

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 406-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Maria Viana de Bragança Garcez ◽  
Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf ◽  
Paulo Amarante de Araújo
Keyword(s):  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Ph Cycling

scholarly journals In Vitro Fluoride-Release/Recharge Pattern and Antimicrobial Effects of Current Restorative Materials Used in Pediatric Dentistry

Experimed ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 7-15
Author(s):  
Belen Şirinoğlu-Çapan ◽  
Serap Akyüz ◽  
Burçin Alev ◽  
Beste Tacal-Aslan ◽  
Tanju Kadir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Dentistry ◽  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Antimicrobial Effects ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Materials Used

scholarly journals A comparison of the remineralizing potential of dental restorative materials by analyzing their fluoride release profiles

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 815-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicja Porenczuk ◽  
Bartłomiej Jankiewicz ◽  
Magdalena Naurecka ◽  
Bartosz Bartosewicz ◽  
Bartosz Sierakowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Dental Restorative Materials ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Dental Restorative ◽  
Release Profiles
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document