scholarly journals In Vitro Fluoride-Release/Recharge Pattern and Antimicrobial Effects of Current Restorative Materials Used in Pediatric Dentistry

Experimed ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 7-15
Author(s):  
Belen Şirinoğlu-Çapan ◽  
Serap Akyüz ◽  
Burçin Alev ◽  
Beste Tacal-Aslan ◽  
Tanju Kadir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Dentistry ◽  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Antimicrobial Effects ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Materials Used

In vitro occlusal wear of restorative materials on primary teeth

2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Villalta ◽  
C.R. Rodrigues
Keyword(s):  
Tooth Enamel ◽  
Pediatric Dentistry ◽  
Permanent Tooth ◽  
Primary Tooth ◽  
In Vitro Test ◽  
Test Protocol ◽  
Occlusal Wear ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Materials Used

Since primary tooth enamel wears more rapidly than permanent tooth enamel, it is important to study the mechanical wear patterns of restorative materials used in the primary dentition. It is important that an in vitro evaluation of wear resistance of different restorative materials is done in order to establish a valid in vitro test protocol for use in pediatric dentistry.

scholarly journals Color stability of esthetic restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry: An in vitro study

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 233 ◽  
Author(s):  
JogendraSai Sankar Avula ◽  
Hanisha Adusumilli ◽  
Pranitha Kakarla ◽  
Sujatha Bandi ◽  
GeorgeManoj Kumar Mallela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Color Stability ◽  
Pediatric Dentistry ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Materials Used

An in vitro Evaluation of Artificial Caries-like Lesions on Restored Overdenture Abutments

1988 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 582-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.P. Kambhu ◽  
R.L. Ettinger ◽  
J.S. Wefel
Keyword(s):  
Light Microscopy ◽  
Polarized Light ◽  
Polarized Light Microscopy ◽  
The Other ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Abutment Teeth ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Materials Used

An acidified dialyzed gelatin gel system was used to determine the caries resistance of a variety of restorative materials used to obturate the canal orifice of overdenture abutment teeth. The restorative materials used were Tytin, Tytin + Copalite, P30 + Scotchbond, Fuji Ionomer-Type II, and Miracle Mix. Polarized light microscopy and microradiography were used to examine the caries-like lesions adjacent to the restorations. The lesions formed in the Fuji Ionomer-Type II and Miracle Mix groups appeared arrested at the wall adjacent to the restoration, and did not penetrate apically down the wall as did those associated with the other restorative materials. The mean depths of lesions adjacent to Fuji Ionomer-Type II and Miracle Mix restorations were significantly less than those of Tytin, Tytin + Copalite, or P30 + Scotchbond.

In vitro Comparative Evaluation of Various Restorative Materials used for restoring Class III Cavities in Deciduous Anterior Teeth: A Clinical Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1022-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak Khandelwal ◽  
Shweta Nihalani ◽  
Harsh Priyank ◽  
Ankita Verma ◽  
Esha Chaudhary
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Carious Lesions ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Materials Used

ABSTRACT Introduction Beauty standards in today's modernized world scenario are formed by well-aligned and well-designed bright white teeth. One of the major reasons behind patients reporting to dental clinics is pain. Caries in the anterior primary teeth forms one of the major concerns from a restorative point of view. Very few studies are quoted in literature which stresses on the follow-up of anterior restorations in primary teeth. Hence, we evaluated and compared the efficacy of composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RGIC) for class III restorations in primary anterior teeth. Materials and methods The present study was conducted in the pediatric dental wing and included a total of 80 patients aged 3 to 5½ years who reported with the chief complaint of carious lesions in the primary anterior teeth. Patients having minimal of a pair of similar appearing small carious lesions on the same proximal surfaces of the deciduous maxillary incisors were included for the study. All the patients were randomly divided into two groups: One in which RGIC restoration was done and other in which composite restoration was done. Cavity preparation was done and filling of the cavity with the restorative materials was carried out. Assessment of the restorations was done at 4, 8, and 12 months time following criteria given by Ryge et al. All the results were analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Mann–Whitney test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to evaluate the level of significance; p value less than 0.05 was considered as significant. Results For composite and RGIC restorations, the mean score for anatomic shape was 1.21 and 1.10 respectively. While comparing the clinical parameters, nonsignificant results were obtained between composite and RGIC restorative materials at 4-, 8-, and 12-month interval. On comparing the clinical parameters for individual restorative materials at different time intervals, statistically significant results were obtained only for anatomical shape and form. Conclusion Both RGIC and composite resin restorative materials showed acceptable clinical outcomes after 12 months of follow-up in deciduous anterior teeth. In restoring class III restorations in primary anterior teeth, both the restorative materials showed similar outcome. Clinical significance How to cite this article Priyank H, Verma A, Gupta K, Chaudhary E, Khandelwal D, Nihalani S. In vitro Comparative Evaluation of Various Restorative Materials used for restoring Class III Cavities in Deciduous Anterior Teeth: A Clinical Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(12):1022-1026.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and recharge potential of novel and traditional fluoride-releasing restorative materials: An in vitro study

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 622 ◽  
Author(s):  
MVidya Saraswathi ◽  
Sayan Dasgupta ◽  
Krishnaraj Somayaji ◽  
KalyanaChakravarthy Pentapati ◽  
Prajwal Shetty
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Recharge Potential ◽  
Restorative Materials

scholarly journals Coronal Sealing Capacity of Temporary Restorative Materials in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comparative Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-118
Author(s):  
Shabnam Milani ◽  
Bahman Seraj ◽  
Alireza Heidari ◽  
Atousa Mirdamadi ◽  
Mahdi Shahrabi
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Pediatric Dentistry ◽  
Blue Dye ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Dye Penetration ◽  
Sealing Capacity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Restorative Materials

ABSTRACT Aims The aim of this in vitro study is to compare the coronal microleakage of three common temporary restorative materials, namely Coltosol, Compoglass, and Zonalin, used in pediatric dentistry after endodontic treatment at different time intervals (1 week, 1, and 2 months) using dye penetration. Materials and methods Access cavities were prepared in 72 intact extracted premolar teeth. The samples were divided into three groups (n = 24) and filled with Coltosol, Compoglass, or Zonalin. After thermal cycling for 500 cycles (5–55°C), the teeth were immersed in 1% methylene blue dye at 37°C for 1 week (n = 8), 1 month (n = 8), and 2 months (n = 8). The samples were sectioned buccolingually, and the linear depth of dye penetration was measured using a stereomicroscope at 16 × magnification. The data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test. Results There were no significant differences in the microleakage values of Coltosol and Zonalin or Zonalin and Compoglass groups at 1 week (p > 0.05) or 1 month (p > 0.05) intervals, but a significant difference was noted between Coltosol and Compoglass groups (p < 0.01); Coltosol provided a more favorable coronal seal. No significant difference was found among the experimental groups at the 2-month interval (p > 0.05). Conclusion At 1 week or 1 month of use, Coltosol showed better coronal seal. At 2 months, there was no significant difference apparent between the groups. A longer time lapse was associated with an increased likelihood of microleakage. How to cite this article Milani S, Seraj B, Heidari A, Mirdamadi A, Shahrabi M. Coronal Sealing Capacity of Temporary Restorative Materials in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comparative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(2):115-118.

In vitro fluoride release from restorative materials in water versus artificial saliva medium (SAGF)

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 441-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Levallois ◽  
Yannick Fovet ◽  
Luc Lapeyre ◽  
Jean Yves Gal
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Restorative Materials

scholarly journals Investigation of microleakage of polymerized with LED and halogen light devices four different restorative materials

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-79
Author(s):  
Ayşe Günay ◽  
Emin Caner Tümen
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Dentistry ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Primary Molar ◽  
Class V ◽  
Led Light ◽  
Halogen Light ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Native Speakers Of English ◽  
In Vitro Effects

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro effects on microleakage of LED and halogen light devices used in the polymerization of monomer structure composite resins of different viscosities and inorganic filling particle size applied to standard class V cavities in primary teeth. Methodology: 80 non caries primary molar teeth with standard class v cavity on the buccal surfaces were used. The teeth were randomly divided into 4 main groups and restored with composite resins (Herculite® XRV, Ultra™, Filtek™ Silorane, Vertise™ Flow, Æliteflo™). Each group was divided into 2 sub-groups for polymerization with LED or halogen light devices. Following the thermal cycle and subsequent procedures, the dye penetration method was used to evaluate microleakage. The microleakage scores were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Results: According to the results of the statistical analysis, in polymerization made with halogen and LED light devices at the occlusal edge, the microleakage scores from lowest to highest were as follows: Filtek™ Silorane < Herculite® XRV Ultra™ < Æliteflo™ < Vertise™ Flow. In polymerization made with halogen and LED light devices at the gingival edge, the microleakage scores from lowest to highest were as follows: Filtek™ Silorane < Herculite® XRV Ultr™ < Vertise™ Flow < Æliteflo™. Conclusion: In the polymerizations made by using LED and halogen light devices, Herculite® XRV Ultra™, was found to be successful as it showed similar values to Filtek™ Silorane, which gave the best results in terms of microleakage. Moreover, as we have reached similar findings in our thesis study in respect of microleakage, in cases indicating the use of flow composite resin materials such as Æliteflo™, Vertise™ Flow can be used as it has the advantage of ease application and thus provide an ideal alternative in pediatric dentistry.   How to cite this article: Günay A, Tümen EC. Investigation of microleakage of polymerized with LED and halogen light devices four different restorative materials. Int Dent Res 2020;10(3):73-9. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no3.2   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document