scholarly journals Local management of common property. Theory and practice of the common pastures in Morocco

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Venema
Keyword(s):  
Common Property ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Local Management ◽  
Property Theory ◽  
The Common ◽  
Common Property Theory

scholarly journals Management of the common property of an apartment building: legal issues

2019 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 02096
Author(s):  
Ulyana Filatova ◽  
Natalia Dalbaeva ◽  
Nina Semeryanova ◽  
Ludmila Dolnikova ◽  
Dmitriy Bayanov
Keyword(s):  
Common Property ◽  
Residential Buildings ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activity ◽  
Material Base ◽  
Apartment Building ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
Essential Condition ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Common

The article discusses the main issues of the legal regime of public facilities in non-residential buildings, the system of management of such property. The relevance of the research topic is manifested in the following aspects. With the development of market economy, the need to use non-residential premises, including those located in buildings, has increased. The presence of material base is an essential condition for the development of entrepreneurial activity. However, legislative gaps in the field of common property management by owners of non-residential premises lead to deceleration of economic processes and adversely affect sustainable development and welfare of cities. For a long time, in theory and practice, there were different opinions about the possibility of extending, by analogy with the common property of the building, provisions on the common property regime of an apartment building. Despite the fact that the issue of legal vacuum was partially solved by the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation by the issuance of Resolution No. 64 of the Plenum of July 23, 2009, many questions on the legality of using the proclaimed analogy of the law still do not find an unequivocal solution in lawmaking and law enforcement activities of relevant legislative and judicial bodies.

Common property theory and resource governance institutions: strengthening explanations of multiple outcomes

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
ARUN AGRAWAL ◽  
CATHERINE SHANNON BENSON
Keyword(s):  
Common Property ◽  
Interdisciplinary Approach ◽  
Renewable Resource ◽  
Multiple Outcomes ◽  
Property Theory ◽  
Resource Governance ◽  
Natural Resource Governance ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Governance Institutions ◽  
Common Property Theory

SUMMARYDifferent strategies to govern resource commons generate outcomes that can be assessed along different dimensions, in terms of the ecological or social sustainability of the resource system, contributions to the livelihoods of those who rely on these resources, or equity in the allocation of benefits. This paper reviews the existing literature concerning three major renewable resource commons, namely pasture lands, fisheries and irrigation water. Most existing work on these commons has been inattentive to the multiple outcomes that management of all renewable resources generates. Studies of commons can provide better information about livelihoods, sustainability and equity dimensions of natural resource governance outcomes than previously. Attending to the distinctive determinants and drivers of these outcomes and the nature of trade-offs and synergies among them has the potential to advance common property theory substantially. Possible relationships among livelihoods, sustainability and equity are identified, and the major explanations of outcomes advanced by scholars of fisheries, pastoral and irrigation commons reviewed. An interdisciplinary approach is needed to improve existing efforts to determine the outcomes that resource commons generate.

Variation in fishers' attitudes within an inshore fishery: implications for management

2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELIZABETH A. RICHARDSON ◽  
MICHEL J. KAISER ◽  
GARETH EDWARDS-JONES
Keyword(s):  
Common Property ◽  
Management Tool ◽  
Resource Base ◽  
Management Tools ◽  
Property Theory ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Attitudinal Differences ◽  
Theoretical Predictions ◽  
Species Mobility ◽  
Common Property Theory

Understanding the incentives influencing the attitudes and behaviour of resource users is a crucial input to the design of institutions for resource management. Typically fishers have been expected to exploit resources in an independent profit-maximizing manner, which is in line with common property theory, although these expectations are not always met because fishers' behaviours and attitudes are generally more heterogeneous than previously considered. Attitudinal differences between participants in the inshore commercial fishery of Wales, UK, were investigated. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 161 fishers from the five main sectors, namely mobile gear fishers, crustacean potters, whelk potters, line/net fishers and transient fishers. Unprompted expressions of attitudes and responses to open-ended questions underwent thematic-coding and were analysed with fishers' responses to structured questions. Investigation into whether the incentive to participate in resource stewardship varied between sectors as predicted by common property theory found attitudinal similarities across the sectors, but also certain important differences. Results suggested an attitudinal continuum, with mobile gear fishers and crustacean potters at the two extremes, and intermediate positions occupied by transient fishers, whelk potters and line/net fishers. Mobile gear fishers believed most strongly that their fishery was controlled too tightly and was impacted by other fishers and other anthropogenic influences. Crustacean potters believed most strongly that conservation of stocks was necessary and that minimum landing sizes were not overcautious. The attitudes that characterized each sector were related to the characteristics of the sector and its resource base, and generally concurred with theoretical predictions. In particular, target species' mobility and past sector experiences predicted the inclination of fishers in each sector towards resource stewardship. The observed attitudinal differences implied varying personal discount rates that may affect how respondents respond to and comply with management tools. Furthermore, attitudinal differences among sectors mean that an effective management tool in one sector may be inappropriate or counterproductive in another.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document