scholarly journals International Conference on Creative and Innovative Technology Education 2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Norah MD Noor
Keyword(s):  
Technology Education ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
High Standard ◽  
Program Committee ◽  
Innovative Technology ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
International Conference ◽  
Or Practice ◽  
Quality Of Presentation

It is my great pleasure to present to you this special issue containing selected extended papers originally presented at the International Conference on Creative and Innovative Technology Education 2018 (iCITE2018), which took place in Johor Bahru, Malaysia from July 24 to July 25, 2018. iCITE2018 received 176 abstracts. 141 Authors of accepted abstracts were invited to submit full papers. Full papers were refereed by a double-blind reviewing process. Each paper was reviewed by 2 program committee members’ experts in the relevant field ensuring the publication of top-quality contributions. The peer review process was based on the following criteria: relevance to conference themes, quality of the content, significance for theory or practice, quality of presentation or standard of writing and originality. The final programme consists of 67 contributions were presented at the conference. Of those, 10 have been accepted to be included in this issue. I would like to thank all publication committee and reviewers for their hard work and for meeting the deadlines. In most cases there has been enough time for a round or two of revisions, I am confident, therefore, that the published papers have achieved high standard in terms of both technical content and the quality of presentation.

scholarly journals 2nd International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Energy Advancements (ICCIEA-2021), September 11-12, 2021 Virtual Format

2021 ◽  
Vol 2062 (1) ◽  
pp. 011001
Author(s):  
Nishu Gupta ◽  
Parvesh Kumar ◽  
H. S. Pali
Keyword(s):  
Computational Intelligence ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Steering Committee ◽  
Program Committee ◽  
Technical Program ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Editorial Committee ◽  
International Conference ◽  
Sustainable Technologies ◽  
The World

International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Energy Advancements (ICCIEA-2021) is a prestigious event organized with a motivation to provide an excellent platform for the academicians, researchers, engineers, industrial participants and budding students around the world to share their research findings with the global experts. The conference aimed to provide researchers and attendees with prospects for global collaboration and networking among universities and corporate organizations for promoting research. ICCIEA-2021 was conducted in virtual format owing to the pandemic situation during 11th to 12th September 2021. It involved all classes of academia having research orientation. The conference was organized jointly by departments of ECE and ME, Vaagdevi College of Engineering and King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia. As it was an event conducted in cyber form, the presentations were delivered using an online platform. Five different and parallel technical sessions were scheduled based upon the tracks of the articles and a Best Paper was awarded in each session. A total of 38 articles were selected for presentation after double blind peer review process. This proceeding issue compiles oral presentations that were presented by the authors and rigorously reviewed by a special committee designated by the editor team of the conference. The organizing and editorial committee of the ICCIEA-2021 hopes you enjoy reading the articles published in this volume of the JPCS. Besides, we wish to thank all the authors and participants for providing their valuable contributions for this proceeding as well as the reviewers for their constructive recommendations and criticism aiding to improve the presented articles. We are confident that this issue will serve as a reference for computational intelligence, industrial automation, energy advancements and sustainable technologies in the world of scientific research, engineering and technology. List of Organizing Committee, Steering Committee, Technical Program Committee, Industry Experts Committee, Editorial Committee, Invited Speakers, Organizing Institutions, Academic Partner are available in this pdf.

scholarly journals PENINGKATAN MUTU UJIAN DARI PAPER BASED MENUJU COMPUTER BASED

CCIT Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-311
Author(s):  
Ferry Sudarto ◽  
Hidayati Hidayati ◽  
Ageng Setiani Rafika
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
High Standard ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
Innovative Technology ◽  
Limit Value ◽  
Computer Based ◽  
Exam System

Adoption of the exam objectives in a learning process is to determine the quality of one’s learner after going through the learning process. Exams are also an evaluation of the monitoring process carried out continuously and sustainably will ultimately be able to fix the quality of education. Determination of the ever-increasing standards expected to encourage the improvement of education quality, which is the determination of educational standards is the determination of the limit value (passing score). Someone said to have passed / are competent when it has passed the limit value. In the world of Education in Higher Education Raharja for example, in order to obtain the concentration Communication and Innovative Technology (CCIT) who have exam system that v used Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) Benchmarking the learning standards. But it was not as easy as expected, due to problems regarding the exams are still using paper based are not inaccordance with the standard CCNA Benchmarking using computer-based exam. Benchmarking standard exam is CCNA is a computer based exam where students can do the exam questions on a computer that random such questions, which makes each student can work on the problems at the same time but each working on different problems. In the matter of computer-based working time limits there are also questions it. In Higher Education Raharja, test is still manual (paper based) where the students are still working on the exam questions and answers contained in the paper. The concept paper based is much less effective,can not even detect students who work together when the exam. At present it has developed a new method is more effective and certainly the most can help overcome these problems. Example for computer Based exam is CCNA exam and The Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) computer based and Raharja high-standard universities. In this article also identified at least four fundamental problems concerning the concept of computerbased exam, defining test methods based computer as a new way of tackling paper based exam, and final test of is to implement a computer based on the Higher Education Raharja. Computer-based methods is very important to be developed, because its function is effective in providing quality improvement exam in Higher Education Raharja thus continues to provide ease in doing the exam students and faculty in terms of giving value to students. In addition, computer-based exam process is also well suited to the needs. It can even be said that the computer based exams can erode the operational work of approximately 80% of original work not to perform the correction process answers all students who did a paperbased exam.

scholarly journals Preface

2022 ◽  
Vol 2148 (1) ◽  
pp. 011001
Keyword(s):  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Program Committee ◽  
Applied Physics ◽  
International Conference ◽  
Engineering Mathematics ◽  
The People ◽  
New Ideas ◽  
Generous Support ◽  
Review Reports

The Program Committee warmly welcomes all our distinguished delegates and guests to attend the 2021 2nd International Conference on Physics and Engineering Mathematics (ICPEM 2021), the Online International Conference to be held on November 13th-14th, 2021. ICPEM is an annual event that focuses on the various state-of-the-art advances and innovations in Applied Physics and Engineering Mathematics. It aims to provide a forum for researchers, engineers and academicians to exchange new ideas and application experiences, establish business or research relations and find global partners for future collaboration in the fields of Physics and Engineering Mathematics. The ICPEM 2021 conference received around 141 submissions from all over the world; all submissions went through a rigorous peer review process where each submitted paper was reviewed by at least two experts from the area. Based on the review reports, 69 papers were selected for oral presentation in the conference and included in the Proceedings of 2021 2nd International Conference on Physics and Engineering Mathematics. On behalf of the Program Committee of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Physics and Engineering Mathematics, we would like to thank all the people who have contributed to the conference this year. In particular, we would like to thank all referees for their review work. We would like to thank the keynote speakers and session chairs for spending their valuable time to support the conference. We also would like to thank all the authors for contributing their papers to the conference. Finally, we are particularly grateful to all the organizers and sponsoring institutions for the generous support they have offered to this conference. We hope and believe that every participant will enjoy the academic atmosphere brought by the contributors of the conference. We look forward to a more successful conference next year. The Organizing Committee of ICPEM2021

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 897 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
High Standard ◽  
Subject Area ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: EasyChair System • Number of submissions received: 54 (46 Full papers + 8 Abstracts) • Number of submissions sent for review: 46 • Number of submissions accepted: 24 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 52.17% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 26 • Any additional info on review process: REEE holds the belief that the academic research work should be original and published only once. Each of selected paper was anonymously reviewed by two/three professional experts in the related subject area to ensure the final high standard and quality of each accepted submission. Authors have to revise according to reviewers’ suggestions before submitting the final paper. • Contact person for queries: Eden Mamut ([email protected]) Polytechcnic of Porto, Portugal

scholarly journals International Conference on Physics and Energy 2021(ICPAE 2021)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2040 (1) ◽  
pp. 011001
Keyword(s):  
Advisory Committee ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
High Standard ◽  
Scientific Publication ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Review Committee ◽  
International Conference ◽  
Technical Review ◽  
Wolaita Sodo

PREFACE This special issue includes the proceedings of the First International Conference on Physics and Energy 2021 (ICPAE 2021), which was held during 21st April 2021 at RanBal Research Institute (RBRI) in Kancheepuram, Tamilnadu, India. ICPAE 2021 provided a platform to experts, researchers, scholars, and academicians across the globe to exhibit their recent innovative research results and the most recent trends in the diverse fields of Physics and Energy. The first edition of ICPAE 2021 was represented by many potential authors. The program comprised of three plenary and four Invited lectures and eighty oral presentations covering emerging fields of Physics and Energy. The organizing committee sincerely acknowledges the support and continuous encouragement from Shri. E. Santhanam, Smt. S. Selvambal [Patrons-RBRI], Prof. P. Anandhi [Conference Chair] and Prof. P. Kumaran [Conference Secretary], Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia. Also, the organizing committee would like to express thanks to Dr. D.S. Vijayan, Associate Professor/Dept. of Civil Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu, Paiyanoor, Chennai, India, for rendering his support to the publishing committee. We are grateful to the advisory committee and technical review committee (National/International) for their valuable suggestions and contributions in organizing the mammoth scientific event. The first edition of the ICPAE 2021 proceedings includes fifty six papers eventually accepted after a careful peer-review process accomplished on the presented articles. The organizers sincerely thank to the guest editors and all the reviewers for their great efforts in bringing out the high standard scientific publication. The organizers of the conference are indebted to the publisher of Journal of Physics: Conference Sries (IOP Publisher), for giving consent to publish these papers under the special issue category. Conference Secretary Dr.P. Kumaran M.E., Ph.D Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia Guest Editors Guest Editors Dr. S. Harikrishnan M.E, Ph.D Professor & Head Department of Mechanical Engineering Kings Engineering College Irungattukottai, Chennai – 602117, India Dr.P. Anandhi M.Tech., Ph.D Associate Professor Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering P.B. College of Engineering Irungattukottai, Chennai – 602117, India Advisory Committee, Technical Review Committee (International Members), Technical Review Committee (National Members) are available in the pdf

scholarly journals EDITORIAL

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huseyin Uzunboylu
Keyword(s):  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
High Quality Research ◽  
Related Field ◽  
Educational Sciences ◽  
Day By Day

Dear Colleagues; It is a great honour for us to welcome you as Editor of Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, which has accepted publications indexed in qualified databases since 2006. Our main aim is to increase the quality of the journal day by day. We are ready to publish the new issue of Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, which has eight articles with authors from various countries. The aim of this issue is to give the researchers an opportunity to share their academic studies. A total number of forty-three (43) manuscripts were submitted for this issue and each paper has been subjected to double-blind peer review process by the reviewers specialized in the related field. At the end of the review process, a total number of thirteen (13) high quality research papers were selected and accepted for publication. First of all, I would like to thank all authors who have contributed to this issue . The topics of the next issue will be different. You can make sure that we will be trying to serve you with our journal with a rich knowledge in which different kinds of topics are discussed in 2019 Volume. I would like to present many thanks to all the contributors who helped to publish this issue.   Best Regards,  Prof. Dr. Huseyin Uzunboylu Editor in Chief

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 879 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
English Language ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Program Committee ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
English Grammar ◽  
Review Editor ◽  
Sustainable Landscape

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. The 5th International Symposium of Sustainable Landscape Development (The 5th ISSLD) was held on 22-23 September 2020 in Bogor, Indonesia. All papers published in this proceeding have been peer-reviewed through a process managed by the Editor by involving reviewers from academics and professionals in the field of landscape architecture. • Type of peer review: Double-blind All papers were uploaded through the organizer’s website http://arl.faperta.ipb.ac.id/symposium. All papers passed a basic check of writing format, including size, margins, font type and size, manuscript structure, compliance with submission instructions, quality of English grammar, and plagiarism checks. Reviewers provided opportunities to Authors for correction of discrepancies in the writing format and English grammar and plagiarism. Papers that still did not meet the minimum 25% of plagiarism checks were rejected. We used a double-blind system for peer-review while keeping the identity of reviewers and authors anonymous. One external reviewer and one review editor staff member reviewed each paper using professional and scientific standards. The review process took approximately 30 days. The reviewers decided to accept or reject the paper along with the reasons. Editor sent forms of correction, acceptance, and rejection to the appropriate authors. • Submission management system: The submission was made through the ISSLD website management system at the address http://arl.faperta.ipb.ac.id/symposium developed by the ISSLD Operator. The submission, review, and acceptance systems were carried out through the website. Management of the website also includes: 1. Managing access of reviewers and editors to papers; 2. Automatic registration for ISSLD 3. Papers submission; 4. List of ISSLD every year; 4. Program book schedule of events, materials for Keynote and Invited Speakers, the title of the presentation, and presenter’s name. 5. Communication via email between the program committee, reviewers, and authors; 6. Preparation and Publication of conference programs; 7. All authors who submit papers are assumed to have accepted the terms of Publication License; 8. All requirements for papers, templates, and sample papers can be accessed for Author or aspiring writer. • Number of submissions received: 65 • Number of submissions sent for review: 56 • Number of submissions accepted: 46 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 82,14 • The average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 14 • Any additional info on the review process: All papers have passed the English language check using Grammarly and plagiarism check using Turnitin • Contact person for queries: Name : Akhmad Arifin Hadi Affiliation: IPB University [email protected] [email protected]

scholarly journals Preface: 2nd International Conference on Education and Educational Development (EED 2021)

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. I
Author(s):  
Yang Zhou ◽  
Benqing Wu ◽  
Pin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Education Reform ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Educational Development ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Cultural Development ◽  
Cultural Backgrounds ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
International Conference ◽  
Blind Review ◽  
Conference Committee

It was a great honor to extend a warm invitation to the 2nd International Conference on Education and Educational Development (EED 2021). The conference was held from September 29-30, 2021 in Suzhou City, China. EED 2021 was co-organized by Hubei Xuemi Cultural Development Co., Ltd. and Research Center of Engineering and Science (RCES).   The aim of EED 2021 is to provide a platform for educators, scholars, managers and graduate students from different cultural backgrounds to present and discuss research, developments and innovations in the fields of Education Reform & Social Science. It provides opportunities for the delegates to exchange new ideas and application experiences, to establish business or research relations and to find global partners for future collaboration.   EED 2021 received 85 manuscripts. And 41 submissions had been accepted by our reviewers. By submitting a paper to EED 2021, the authors agreed to the review process and understood that papers undergo a peer-review process. Manuscripts were reviewed by appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the Conference Committee, who gave detailed comments and-if the submission was accepted the authors would submit a revised version that considered this feedback. All papers were reviewed using a double-blind review process: authors declared their names and affiliations in the manuscript for the reviewers to see, but reviewers did not know each other’s identities, nor did the authors receive information about who had reviewed their manuscript. The Committees of EED 2021 invested great efforts in reviewing the papers submitted to the conference and organizing the sessions to enable the participants to gain maximum benefit.   Hopefully, all participants and other interested readers will benefit scientifically from the proceedings and also find it stimulating in the process.

scholarly journals Editorial

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Mousumi Sengupta
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Present Issue ◽  
International Conference ◽  
Emerging Trends

Welcome to the present issue of SDMIMD Journal of Management. There are total nine articles, and one book review, which have been published in this volume. Among them, six articles are the revised and modified version of the papers, presented in the 5th International Conference on Emerging Trends in Finance, Accounting and Banking; and two papers are revised and modified version of the papers, presented in the 2nd International Conference on Inclusive Economic Growth and Sustainable Development. All the articles and the book review, including the above, have been selected for publication following the journal’s guidelines, and after undergoing ‘double blind’ peer review process.

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

2021 ◽  
Vol 2138 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
High Standard ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Current State ◽  
Online Submission ◽  
Conference Theme ◽  
Adequate Quality ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Scientific Standards

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Each submission is anonymously reviewed by an average of three independent reviewers, to ensure the final high standard and quality of each accepted submission. • Conference submission management system: Online submission • Number of submissions received: 75 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 75 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 52 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 69% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 reviews per paper • Total number of reviewers involved: 40 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: We developed the strict peer review procedures and invite relevant experts to serve as editors in order to control the quality of the papers. First, all articles will be subjected to peer review administered by editors. Then, reviews will be conducted by expert referees, who have been requested to provide unbiased and constructive comments aimed, whenever possible, at improving the work. Final, editors will take all reasonable steps to ensure the quality of the materials they publish and their decision to accept or reject a paper for publication will be based only on the merits of the work and the relevance to the conference theme. The following criteria will be considered by the editors and referees in their evaluation: (1) Is the subject matter within the scope of the conference? (2) Does the paper contain enough original results to warrant publication? (3) Is the paper technically sound and free of errors? (4) Is the work clearly and concisely presented? Is it well organized? (5) Does the title clearly and sufficiently reflect its con tents? (6) Is the abstract informative? Are the main results and conclusions mentioned? (7) Are the illustrations of adequate quality, relevant and understandable? (8) Does the bibliography give a clear view of the current state-of-the-art in the domain? (9) Is the quality of the language satisfactory? • Contact person for queries: Name : Guosong Jiang Affiliation: Huanggang Normal University Email : [email protected]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document