Induction of Resistance in Field Pea against Rust Disease Through Various Chemicals/ Micronutrients and Their Impact on Growth and Yield

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 36-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak Singh ◽  
Ashish Kumar ◽  
Anil Kumar Singh ◽  
H.S. Tripathi
Keyword(s):  
Field Pea ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Rust Disease ◽  
Induction Of Resistance

scholarly journals Comparative Effect of Different Treaments in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)

2021 ◽  
pp. 221-225
Author(s):  
Tharuna Sree ◽  
Abhinav Dayal ◽  
Prashanth Kumar Rai
Keyword(s):  
Gibberellic Acid ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Uttar Pradesh ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Naphthalene Acetic Acid ◽  
Comparative Effect ◽  
Randomized Block Design ◽  
Biological Yield ◽  
Neem Leaf Extract

A field study was conducted to investigate the various treatments that effect on growth and yield of field pea in RBD (Randomized block design) at Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture Technology and Science, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh during march to May in 2020. The trail consists of 13 treatments combinations. The field pea varieties were used were IPF429. The treatments included T0- control, T1,T2,T3,-Gibberellic acid, T4,T5,T6- Neem leaf extract, T7,T8,T9-ZnSo4, T10T11T12- Naphthalene acetic acid(NAA). All Ten parameters treated with Ga3 shows good results in Yield and shows maximum in field emergence, plant height, Days to 50% flowering, Number of pods, Seed yield per plot, Biological Yield and Harvest index. T0 (Un primed) shows lowest of all treatments. Hence, priming with Gibberellic acid could recommended for pre sowing treatment for field pea.

Effects of planting date on growth and yield of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.)

1976 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 649-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Hammerton
Keyword(s):  
Seasonal Pattern ◽  
Pigeon Pea ◽  
Planting Date ◽  
Day Length ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Dominant Factor ◽  
Rust Disease ◽  
Flowering Branch ◽  
Made In ◽  
Number Of Branches

SummaryTwo dwarf pigeon pea cultivars, each at two spacings, were planted at 4-weekly intervals over a year. Differences in height and number of branches between cultivars and spacings were generally small but planting date had much greater effects. Heights at reaping were > 2 m in plantings made in March or April, but decreased with later planting to ca. 1 m in November–February plantings. Time from planting to reaping varied from ca. 120 days in September-February plantings to > 225 days in March or April plantings. Four of the 13 plantings showed loss of mainstem dominance. Defoliation by rust disease showed no seasonal pattern, nor any association with yield. March plantings showed a ‘preliminary’ flowering in which only some wide-spaced and perimeter plants flowered in late July. Yields varied from 0–5 to 10 t/ha as green pods, but one cultivar at a spacing of 0·45 × 0·45 m (49385/ha) gave a mean yield of ca. 5 ±0·57 t/ha. Late-May planting appeared the most efficient, giving a large number of pods per day, per flowering branch and per metre of height, but plants exceeded 2 m in height and took 200 days from planting to reaping. December or January planting gave smaller plants, taking ca. 125 days from planting to reaping. Day-length was a dominant factor influencing growth and yield, but part of this may have been a response to radiation rather than to photoperiod.

scholarly journals Influence of Date of Sowing on Growth and Yield Performance of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes

2020 ◽  
pp. 26-34
Author(s):  
Bulbul Ahmed ◽  
Ahmed Khairul Hasan ◽  
Biswajit Karmakar ◽  
Md. Sahed Hasan ◽  
Fahamida Akter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Seed Yield ◽  
Growth Parameters ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Yield Performance ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Stover Yield ◽  
Growth Characters

An experiment was carried out at the Agronomy Field Laboratory, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh during October 2014 to March 2015 to study the growth and yield performance of field pea varieties as influenced by date of sowing. The experiment comprised of two factors namely, date of sowing and variety. Date of sowing comprised of 29 October, 13 November and 28 November and the variety comprised of BARI motor-1, BADC motor-1, Natore local and Narail local. The experiment was laid out in a split plot design with three replications. The results indicate that all the growth characters were varied significantly at different days after. Those growth characters except leaf area index were highest for the crop sown on 28 November. The growth characters were highest in variety Natore local and lowest in Narail local except dry matter it was lowest in BADC motor-1. The interaction effect of 28 November sowing, Natore local was highest for all of the growth parameters except leaf area index it was highest on 13 November sowing and the interaction on 29 October sowing BARI motor-1 gave the lowest value. Most of the yield contributing parameters significantly affected by sowing date. The highest seed yield (827.7 kg ha-1) and other yield contributing characters were found on early sowing (13 November) and the lowest seed yield (534 kg ha-1) and other yield contributing characters was at 28 November sowing. Variety had significant effect on yield and yield contributing parameters. The highest seed yield (1032.2 kg ha-1) and Stover yield (3221.35 kg ha-1) was obtained from Natore local while Narail local gave lowest (469.1 kg ha-1) seed yield and lowest Stover yield. The interaction of 13 November with Natore local gave the highest seed yield (1319.3 kg ha-1) and lowest seed yield was produced by Narail local (330.35 kg ha-1) by late sowing (28 November). It can be concluded that, vegetative growth were highest at 28 November sowing and yield components gave highest value on 13 November sowing. Highest yield was produced by Natore local at 13 November sowing but yield was reduced drastically when the crop sown on 28 November. So, it is clear that the optimum date of sowing for field pea is at 13 November.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document