Motion Parallax versus Depth, 2D (Visual Depth Perception 12)

2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (15) ◽  
pp. 1969-1978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Nawrot ◽  
Keith Stroyan

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Maniatis

Motion parallax is conventionally described as a “depth cue.” Rogers & Graham (1979) are credited with providing fairly convincing evidence for this view. Here, I argue that, just as in the case of the other so-called “depth cues,” the claim that “motion parallax” constitutes an independent factor supporting shape and depth perception is circular. Authors offering apparent demonstrations of this cue fail to properly distinguish between proximal and distal stimulus and overlook the fundamental confound of figural organization.


1972 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-433
Author(s):  
Sachio Ashida

64 male hooded rats were tested on a visual depth discrimination task in a modified Lashley Jumping Stand. The monocular Ss ( n = 32) were operated upon to close either the left or right eye and the control Ss ( n = 32) were sham operated. There were no significant differences in jumping performance between the binocular and the monocular Ss although the task was facilitated for both groups when a visual depth was increased. However, the monocular Ss showed significant orienting responses toward the “unoperated” side before they jumped. The results suggest that motion parallax overcomes both monocular and binocular visual weakness in a jumping-stand discrimination situation.


1990 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 248-249
Author(s):  
Am CHO ◽  
Kageyu NORO ◽  
Shinya KOSHIE ◽  
Atsuko HONDO ◽  
Sakae YAMAMOTO

1993 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-590
Author(s):  
Mitsunori Tsuda ◽  
Masao Miyazaki ◽  
Yutaka Tanaka ◽  
Noriyuki Uda ◽  
Shigeki Kuzuhara

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. e0200417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Gu ◽  
Dean Bok ◽  
Fei Yu ◽  
Joseph Caprioli ◽  
Natik Piri

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document