scholarly journals Ranibizumab Treatment and Protocols in Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema

2018 ◽  
pp. 143-146
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Common Causes ◽  
Ranibizumab Treatment

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is one of the most common causes of visual loss in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DRP). The prognosis of central involved diabetic macular edema has improved after anti-VEGF treatments. Intravitreal ranibizumab was the first anti-VEGF agent approved by the FDA for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Despite the fact that it is a pathogenic treatment, it has brought some challenging situations on its own. In most studies, optimal dose and combined treatment were evaluated in terms of treatment efficacy. Recent studies revealed that ranibizumab treatment is effective in DRP and proliferative DRP regression as well as in diabetic macular edema treatment. In this article, we aimed to review the effects of Ranibizumab treatment on visual acuity, central macular thickness in patients with diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema through studies.

Effect of Macular Ischemia on Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema

2014 ◽  
Vol 232 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Douvali ◽  
Irini P. Chatziralli ◽  
Panagiotis G. Theodossiadis ◽  
Klio I. Chatzistefanou ◽  
Emmanouella Giannakaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Ranibizumab Treatment ◽  
Macular Ischemia

scholarly journals Flavoprotein Fluorescence Correlation with Visual Acuity Response in Patients Receiving Anti-VEGF Injection for Diabetic Macular Edema

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge S. Andrade Romo ◽  
Giselle Lynch ◽  
Kevin Liu ◽  
Daniel Kim ◽  
Michael Jansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Therapeutic Response ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Fundus Photography ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Structural Improvement ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

Anti-VEGF treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) complicating diabetic retinopathy (DR) has greatly improved structural and visual outcomes for patients with diabetes mellitus. However, up to 50% of patients are either nonresponsive or refractory to anti-VEGF treatment (no improvement in BCVA or central macular thickness (CMT)). It is believed that factors such as mitochondrial structural and functional damage, due to oxidative stress, are partially responsible for this lack of improvement. Flavoprotein fluorescence (FPF) has been shown to be a sensitive marker of mitochondrial function and has been found to correlate with the degree of diabetic retinopathy. FPF may also provide additional information regarding therapeutic response of patients receiving anti-VEGF treatment for DME. Eight patients with DR and DME with clinically significant DME (CSDME) who underwent anti-VEGF (bevacizumab) treatment were imaged before injection and at follow-up visit using FPF in addition to standard color fundus photography and OCT CMT. A strong correlation r=0.98 (p=0.000015) between the FPF decrease and the BCVA improvement was observed; BCVA improved as FPF values decreased. Notably, in the same patients, the correlation between OCT CMT decrease and BCVA improvement (r=0.688) was not found to be significant (p=0.13). These findings suggest that FPF can detect improvement in metabolic function preceding structural improvement and even with small changes in edema. Additionally, FPF may be supplementary to current diagnostic methods for earlier detection of therapeutic response to anti-VEGF treatment in patients with DME.

scholarly journals Comparison of outcomes between intravitreal ranibizumab and intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema with “Treat-and-Extend” regimen

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Sugimoto ◽  
Shinichiro Chujo ◽  
Taku Sasaki ◽  
Atsushi Ichio ◽  
Ryohei Miyata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Thickness ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Treat And Extend ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Intravitreal Aflibercept ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Treat And Extend Regimen

Abstract Background To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) performed with the Treat-and-Extend (TAE) regimen on eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).Patients and methods This was a retrospective study of 125 eyes of 125 treatment naïve DME patients who received anti-VEGF injections at 3 consecutive monthly intervals as the loading phase. Of these 125 eyes, 26 eyes completed the treatment with the TAE regimen for at least 24 months. Among the 26 eyes, 13 eyes of 13 patients (mean age, 70.9±6.0 years) received intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab and 13 eyes of 13 patients (65.9±8.6 years) received 2 mg aflibercept. The changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), diabetic retinopathy severity (DRS), and total injection numbers were compared between the two anti-VEGF agents.Results No significant differences were detected in the baseline demographics. At 24 months, the BCVA was significantly improved in both groups; from 0.31±0.19 to 0.10±0.12 logMAR units for IVR and 0.41±0.19 to 0.16±0.28 logMAR units for IVA ( P=1.29x10 -9 ). The CRT was significantly reduced in both groups; 440.9±69.3 to 307.5±66.4 μm for IVR and 473.9±71.5 to 317.8±71.2 μm for IVA ( P=3.55x10 -9 ). No significant differences were detected in the improvements of the BCVA and the CRT in both groups, and the total injection numbers were significant fewer for the IVA group (11.0±1.2) than the IVR group (12.0±1.0). The DRS was significantly improved in both groups ( P =0.0004 for IVR and P =0.009 for IVA).Conclusion No significant differences were detected in the improvements of the BCVA or CRT and injection numbers between IVR and IVA groups treated with the TAE regimen. These results indicate that the results of the treatment with both agents with the TAE regimen were equally effective.

scholarly journals Renal Biomarkers for Treatment Effect of Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Ivan Pochou Lai ◽  
Wei-Lun Huang ◽  
Chung-May Yang ◽  
Chang-Hao Yang ◽  
Tzyy-Chang Ho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Visual Improvement ◽  
Renal Biomarkers ◽  
One Year ◽  
Ranibizumab Treatment

Aims. To investigate the correlations between renal biomarkers and the treatment outcomes of ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods. This hospital-based study retrospectively enrolled 88 eyes from 67 patients who had received one-year intravitreal ranibizumab treatment for DME. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and during the follow-up period were recorded. BCVA and OCT characteristics at baseline and their changes after ranibizumab treatment were compared between different proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) groups. Results. Of the 88 eyes studied, those with moderately increased proteinuria had a thicker central subfield foveal thickness (CFT) and a higher proportion of intraretinal cysts than those with no proteinuria (P=0.012 and 0.045, respectively) at baseline. After one year of ranibizumab treatment, the reduction in CFT was greater in patients with severely increased proteinuria than those with normal to mildly increased proteinuria (P=0.030). On the other hand, patients with an eGFR <30 tended to have poorer visual improvements than those with normal eGFR (P=0.044). Conclusions. After ranibizumab treatment for DME, patients with severe proteinuria tended to gain better anatomical improvement, while those with poor eGFR tended to have poorer visual improvement.

Dexamethasone Implant in Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema Resistant to Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treatment

2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozlem Eski Yucel ◽  
Ertugrul Can ◽  
Hilal Eser Ozturk ◽  
Hakki Birinci ◽  
Yuksel Sullu
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Dexamethasone Implant ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Ranibizumab Treatment

scholarly journals Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injection As A Treatment For Diabetic Macular Edema

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-57
Author(s):  
Defayudina Dafilianty Rosataria ◽  
Ramzi Amin
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Injection ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Hard Exudates ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
History Of

ABSTRACT Introduction : In general, diabetic retinopathy is classified into early stage, namely non proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and advanced stage, proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Diabetic macular edema is the most common cause of visual impairment in cases of early stage or NPDR. Purpose : To describe Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) with intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF as a treatment. Case report : 43 old female, came with chief complaint of blurred vision on her right eye since six months ago. Blurring is felt slowly. Patient has a history of uncontrolled diabetes since 10 years and a history of hypercholesterolemia since 1 year ago. visual acuity of the right eye is 4/60. On posterior segment examination, neovascularization of the papilla was found. Decreased foveal reflex (+), hard exudates (+) within 500 µm from the central macula. Microaneurism (+), dot hemorrhage (+), blot (+) in 4 quadrants, hard exudates (+) in 2 quadrants in her right eye. The patient was planned for intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF on her right eye. Conclusion : Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF can improve visual acuity and reduce exudate and hemorrhage in retina from ophthalmoscope and fundus photography examination. In addition, the investigation with OCT was found to improve with reduced macular thickness.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document