scholarly journals Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. THOMPSON-SCHILL ◽  
J. JONIDES ◽  
C. MARSHUETZ ◽  
E. E. SMITH ◽  
M. D'ESPOSITO ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon L. Thompson-Schill ◽  
John Jonides ◽  
Christy Marshuetz ◽  
Edwar'D E. Smith ◽  
Mark D'Esposito ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Grégory Lecouvey ◽  
Peggy Quinette ◽  
Grégoria Kalpouzos ◽  
Bérengère Guillery-Girard ◽  
Alexandre Bejanin ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amee Baird ◽  
Bonnie‐Kate Dewar ◽  
Hugo Critchley ◽  
Ray Dolan ◽  
Tim Shallice ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur P. Shimamura ◽  
Paul J. Jurica ◽  
Jennifer A. Mangels ◽  
Felick B. Gershberg ◽  
Robert T. Knight

Patients with frontal lobe lesions were adminstered tests of paired-associate learning in which cue and response words are manipulated to increase interference across two study lists. In one test of paired-associate learning (AB-AC test), cue words used in one list are repeated in a second list but are associated with different response words (e.g., LION-HUNTER, LION-CIRCUS). In another test (AB-ABr test), words used in one list are repeated in a second list but are rearranged to form new pairs. Compared to control subjects, patients with frontal lobe lesions exhibited disproportionate impairment of second-list learning as a result of interference effects. In particular, patients exhibited the poorest performance during the initial trial of the second list, a trial in which interference effects from the first list would be most apparent. These findings suggest that the on-line control of irrelevant or competing memory associations is disrupted following frontal lobe lesions. This disruption may be indicative of an impaired gating or filtering mechanism that affects not only memory function but other cognitive function as well.


1999 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Pantelis ◽  
Fiona Z Barber ◽  
Thomas R.E Barnes ◽  
Hazel E Nelson ◽  
Adrian M Owen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 342-358
Author(s):  
Thomas Edward Gladwin ◽  
Matthijs Vink

Emotionally salient stimuli have the ability to disrupt cognitive processing. This kind of disruption involves effects on working memory and may be related to mental health problems. To explore the nature of such emotional interference on working memory, a Virtual Attack Emotional Sternberg Task (VAEST) was used. Neutral faces were presented as distractors and warning signals, which were sometimes followed by a virtual attack, created by having the neutral face turn angry while the image was enlarged. The attack was hypothesized to have one of two effects: to disrupt cognitive processing and thereby increase interference effects, or to terminate a state of freezing and thereby reduce interference effects. The task was successfully completed online by a sample of 59 students. Results clearly show that the virtual attack caused a reduction of interference relative to no-attack trials. The apparent cognitive disruption caused by emotional distractors may thus reflect freezing, which can be reversed by a freeze-terminating stimulus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document