scholarly journals Terminal extinction performance of a running response following consistent and partial reinforcement and nonreinforcement

1973 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-106
Author(s):  
Roger W. Black ◽  
Joseph Schumpert ◽  
Charles Woodard
1968 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 765-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Spivey ◽  
David T. Hess ◽  
James Klemic

3 groups of albino rats were given 96 acquisition trials in a runway. One group (C) was given consistent reinforcement, while the other 2 groups (PN, PR) received the same partial reinforcement pattern, RRNNRRNN, on each day. Following Trial 4 for Group PN and Trial 5 for Groups PR and C., Ss were given intertrial reinforcement. In extinction the groups were ordered PR, PN, C, with Group PR being most resistant to extinction. Taken in conjunction with the results of studies involving abbreviated training, the findings were interpreted as supporting the view that the same variables or processes influence extinction performance following both abbreviated and extended training. The results were further interpreted as supporting the modified aftereffects hypothesis.


1974 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
G. C. Jernstedt

College students made observing responses in a discrete-trial instrumental-conditioning situation. Intertrial intervals from 1 to 10 sec. were factorially combined with patterns of reinforcement involving different total numbers of non-reinforcements, numbers of successively occurring non-reinforcements, and numbers of non-reinforced—reinforced trial transitions. In agreement with previous studies with rats, Exp. 1 indicated that intertrial interval interacts with pattern of reinforcement and accounts for a large percentage of the total variance. Contrary to previous studies with rats, Exp. 2 indicated that the effects of intertrial interval with humans are due to more than just those intertrial intervals near a non-reinforced—reinforced trial transition. Though much of the basic human and animal partial-reinforcement data are similar, the theoretical accounts apparently should differ.


Infancy ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Weir ◽  
Cynthia Toland ◽  
Rose Ann King ◽  
Lisa Maas Martin

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Michalek ◽  
Marco Vasconcelos ◽  
Peter J. Urcuioli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document