scholarly journals Effects of time out and S+ postponement training procedures on free operant discrimination acquisition

1969 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 218-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Snow ◽  
Charles N. Uhl
Keyword(s):  
Operant Discrimination ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Free Operant

Facilitation of repeated free operant discrimination reversals

1969 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 492-513
Author(s):  
Richard P. Toister ◽  
J.S. Birnbrauer
Keyword(s):  
Operant Discrimination ◽  
Free Operant

scholarly journals Temporal variables in the acquisition of human free-operant avoidance of “time out”

1968 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence E. Hogan ◽  
Alan Baron ◽  
Arnold Kaufman
Keyword(s):  
Free Operant Avoidance ◽  
Operant Avoidance ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Free Operant ◽  
Temporal Variables

Disruption of Free-Operant Successive Discriminations by Septal Damage in Rats

1972 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 524-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Dickinson
Keyword(s):  
Correction Procedure ◽  
Discriminative Performance ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Operant Discrimination ◽  
Extended Training ◽  
Active Mechanism ◽  
Septal Damage ◽  
Free Operant ◽  
Primary Reactions

In Experiment I rats were trained preoperatively on a successive, free-operant discrimination with fixed component durations until S— responding had been minimized. Septal damage resulted in a transitory loss of discriminative performance due to an elevation of S— responding. Experiment II showed a comparable septal deficit following training which employed a “correction” procedure that penalized S— responding. It is concluded that, even after extended training, the maintenance of a low level of S— responding by rats in these types of discriminations requires the operation of an active mechanism which can be disrupted by septal damage. The possibility that this disruption results from a lesion-induced change either in the primary reactions to frustrative non-reward or in associated processes is discussed.

scholarly journals Adventitious reinforcement in free-operant discrimination

1971 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Michael Schoel ◽  
Jennifer Davis ◽  
M. E. Bitterman
Keyword(s):  
Adventitious Reinforcement ◽  
Operant Discrimination ◽  
Free Operant

Response and Reinforcement in Operant Audiometry

1987 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Primus
Keyword(s):  
Operant Conditioning ◽  
Space Versus ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Central Processing ◽  
Operant Discrimination ◽  
Conditioning Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Simple Detection ◽  
Variable Success ◽  
Response Task

Variable success in audiometric assessment of young children with operant conditioning indicates the need for systematic examination of commonly employed techniques. The current study investigated response and reinforcement features of two operant discrimination paradigms with normal I7-month-old children. Findings indicated more responses prior to the onset of habituation when the response task was based on complex central processing skills (localization and coordination of auditory/visual space) versus simple detection. Use of animation in toy reinforcers resulted in more than a twofold increase in the number of subject responses. Results showed no significant difference in response conditioning rate or consistency for the response tasks and forms of reinforcement examined.

Time Out of Mind?

1979 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 695-696
Author(s):  
PETER SUEDFELD
Keyword(s):  
Time Out
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document