scholarly journals Resistance to extinction as a function of delay of reinforcement and the opportunity to retrace in the runway

1967 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 287-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melvin H. Marx
Keyword(s):  
Resistance To Extinction ◽  
Delay Of Reinforcement

Delay of Reinforcement and Resistance to Extinction: A Supplementary Report

1965 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 197-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Edward Renner
Keyword(s):  
Deprivation Level ◽  
Resistance To Extinction ◽  
Delay Of Reinforcement ◽  
Rate Of Decline ◽  
Supplementary Report ◽  
Position Discrimination

The effects of deprivation level, goal-related cues, and delay of reinforcement on the extinction of a position discrimination response were observed. Deprivation level and cues did not differentially affect rate of extinction or the number of perseveration responses. Delay of reinforcement resulted in a lower level of performance at the end of acquisition and during extinction, and for immediate reinforcement Ss, the rate of decline during extinction was faster although they showed greater initial perseveration.

Resistance to extinction as a function of constant delay of reinforcement

1965 ◽  
Vol 2 (1-12) ◽  
pp. 333-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melvin H. Marx ◽  
Donald F. McCoy ◽  
Jo W. Tombaugh
Keyword(s):  
Constant Delay ◽  
Resistance To Extinction ◽  
Delay Of Reinforcement

Effects of constant delay of reinforcement on acquisition asymptote and resistance to extinction.

1967 ◽  
Vol 73 (4, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 634-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Sgro ◽  
James A. Dyal ◽  
Ernest J. Anastasio
Keyword(s):  
Constant Delay ◽  
Resistance To Extinction ◽  
Delay Of Reinforcement

Effects of Delay of Reinforcement and Cues upon Acquisition and Extinction Performance

1969 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 931-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom N. Tombaugh ◽  
Jo W. Tombaugh
Keyword(s):  
Extinction Performance ◽  
Discrete Trial ◽  
Resistance To Extinction ◽  
Reinforcement Interval ◽  
Delay Of Reinforcement

The effects of pairing cues with the termination of a delay of reinforcement interval were studied in a discrete-trial barpress situation. In acquisition, one group of rats received immediate reinforcement while a second group received a 10-sec. delay. Light cues were paired with the presentation of reinforcement for both groups. In extinction each group was split and half the Ss received the cues and half the Ss did not. Resistance to extinction, as measured by barpress latency, was reliably greater for the immediate reinforcement and cue conditions. No interaction between delay and cues was evident.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document