scholarly journals Effects of sequences of sucrose reward magnitudes with short ITIs in rats

1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Burns
Keyword(s):  
1979 ◽  
Vol 44 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1311-1316
Author(s):  
Richard J. Nicholls ◽  
Victor Duch

Four groups of rats were given single-alternation training in a runway using sucrose reward and then extinguished. Only subjects given training with a short interval (10 sec.) between rewarded and nonrewarded trials and a long interval (40 min.) between nonrewarded and rewarded trials learned patterned responding. This duplicated the results found in classical conditioning with a similar manipulation. The acquisition and extinction data led to the conclusion that intertrial interval cues can be made more important than aftereffects in producing patterning with sucrose reinforcement.


2004 ◽  
Vol 172 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Besheer ◽  
Matthew I. Palmatier ◽  
Dawn M. Metschke ◽  
Rick A. Bevins

2012 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan T. Lacy ◽  
Lauren L. Hord ◽  
Amanda J. Morgan ◽  
Steven B. Harrod

1971 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. McCloskey ◽  
Tom N. Tombaugh

2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (7) ◽  
pp. 1497-1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Lardeux ◽  
Dany Paleressompoulle ◽  
Remy Pernaud ◽  
Martine Cador ◽  
Christelle Baunez

The search for treatment of cocaine addiction raises the challenge to find a way to diminish motivation for the drug without decreasing it for natural rewards. Subthalamic nucleus (STN) inactivation decreases motivation for cocaine while increasing motivation for food, suggesting that STN can dissociate different rewards. Here, we investigated how rat STN neurons respond to cues predicting cocaine or sucrose and to reward delivery while rats are performing a discriminative stimuli task. We show that different neuronal populations of STN neurons encode cocaine and sucrose. In addition, we show that STN activity at the cue onset predicts future error. When changing the reward predicted unexpectedly, STN neurons show capacities of adaptation, suggesting a role in reward-prediction error. Furthermore, some STN neurons show a response to executive error (i.e., “oops neurons”) that is specific to the missed reward. These results position the STN as a nexus where natural rewards and drugs of abuse are coded differentially and can influence the performance. Therefore, STN can be viewed as a structure where action could be taken for the treatment of cocaine addiction.


2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 641-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pério ◽  
M.-c. Barnouin ◽  
M. Poncelet ◽  
P. Soubrié

2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 809-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik W. Moody ◽  
Ceyhun Sunsay ◽  
Mark E. Bouton

Previous research in this laboratory suggests that priming of the conditional stimulus (CS) in short-term memory may play a role in the trial-spacing effects in appetitive conditioning. For example, a nonreinforced presentation of a CS 60 s before a reinforced trial with the same CS produced slower acquisition than a CS presentation that occurred 240 s before the reinforced trial. The results were consistent with the self-generated priming mechanism proposed by Wagner (e.g., Wagner 1978, 1981). The present experiments extended the earlier work by examining the effects of trial spacing in extinction rather than acquisition. After conditioning with a mixture of intertrial intervals (ITIs), rats received extinction with ITIs of 60 or 240 s, longer or shorter values, or different ways of “chunking” extinction trials in time. Although trial spacing produced effects on extinction performance that were consistent with our previous research on acquisition, there were few long-term differences in spontaneous recovery or in reinstatement. Short ITIs in extinction appear to affect extinction performance more than they affect extinction learning. Mechanisms of trial spacing in conditioning and extinction are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document