scholarly journals Transfer of oddity learning in the pigeon

1985 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Pisacreta ◽  
Paul Lefave ◽  
Tim Lesneski ◽  
Cathy Potter
Keyword(s):  
1983 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Sugimura

128 kindergarten children learned an oddity task with no repeated stimuli until they reached one of the three criteria of 4/4, 8/8, and 8/8 + 20 correct responses, and then they were given either an oddity task with repeated stimuli or a discrimination task. With increasing numbers of pretraining trials, the repeated oddity learning became significantly easier but ease of the discrimination learning did not change significantly. These findings were interpreted as showing that attention to relational cues increased to a high level through learning the nonrepeated oddity task, whereas attention to absolute cues remained at almost the same level as in the control group with no pretraining.


1955 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis E. Moon ◽  
Harry F. Harlow

1973 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 920-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Candace K. Johnson ◽  
Roger T. Davis

Old highly experienced rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) retained oddity learning-sets nearly perfectly until retested 7 yr. later without specific intervening experience on oddity problems. Younger animals, which were not as proficient at oddity learning-sets initially, very rapidly approached the level of the old animals during the test for retention.


1980 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 278-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Zentall ◽  
David E. Hogan ◽  
Charles A. Edwards ◽  
Eliot Hearst
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vernon Strength ◽  
Thomas R. Zentall
Keyword(s):  

1969 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 541-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Saravo ◽  
Eugene S. Gollin

1978 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia S. Scott ◽  
Betty J. House
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document