scholarly journals Erratum to: Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences

1996 ◽  
Vol 58 (7) ◽  
pp. 1143-1143
Author(s):  
Julian S. Joseph ◽  
Lance M. Optican
Keyword(s):  
Attentional Shifts

scholarly journals Frequent Pattern Mining of Eye-Tracking Records Partitioned into Cognitive Chunks

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Noriyuki Matsuda ◽  
Haruhiko Takeuchi
Keyword(s):  
Eye Tracking ◽  
Pattern Mining ◽  
Frequent Pattern Mining ◽  
Frequent Pattern ◽  
Web Page ◽  
Threshold Levels ◽  
Attentional Shifts

Assuming that scenes would be visually scanned by chunking information, we partitioned fixation sequences of web page viewers into chunks using isolate gaze point(s) as the delimiter. Fixations were coded in terms of the segments in a5×5mesh imposed on the screen. The identified chunks were mostly short, consisting of one or two fixations. These were analyzed with respect to the within- and between-chunk distances in the overall records and the patterns (i.e., subsequences) frequently shared among the records. Although the two types of distances were both dominated by zero- and one-block shifts, the primacy of the modal shifts was less prominent between chunks than within them. The lower primacy was compensated by the longer shifts. The patterns frequently extracted at three threshold levels were mostly simple, consisting of one or two chunks. The patterns revealed interesting properties as to segment differentiation and the directionality of the attentional shifts.

Attentional shifts to emotionally charged cues: Behavioural and erp data

1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 507-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kjell Morten Stormark ◽  
Helge Nordby ◽  
Kenneth Hugdahl
Keyword(s):  
Attentional Shifts

Visual sensitivity and internally driven attentional shifts

2009 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. S238
Author(s):  
Noriko Yamagishi ◽  
Stephen J. Anderson ◽  
Mitsuo Kawato
Keyword(s):  
Visual Sensitivity ◽  
Attentional Shifts

scholarly journals The speed of attentional shifts in the visual field.

1991 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 1812-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Saarinen ◽  
B. Julesz
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Attentional Shifts

scholarly journals Neural mechanisms underlying conscious and unconscious attentional shifts triggered by eye gaze

NeuroImage ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 118-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wataru Sato ◽  
Takanori Kochiyama ◽  
Shota Uono ◽  
Motomi Toichi
Keyword(s):  
Eye Gaze ◽  
Neural Mechanisms ◽  
Attentional Shifts

scholarly journals Attentional shifts between surfaces: effects on detection and early brain potentials

2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (13) ◽  
pp. 1619-1630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tupac Pinilla ◽  
Ariadna Cobo ◽  
Karina Torres ◽  
Mitchell Valdes-Sosa
Keyword(s):  
Brain Potentials ◽  
Attentional Shifts

scholarly journals AUTOMATIC ATTENTIONAL SHIFTS BY GAZE, GESTURES, AND SYMBOLS

PSYCHOLOGIA ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wataru SATO ◽  
Takanori KOCHIYAMA ◽  
Shota UONO ◽  
Sakiko YOSHIKAWA
Keyword(s):  
Attentional Shifts

scholarly journals A role for attentional reorienting during approximate multiplication and division

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curren Katz ◽  
Hannes Hoesterey ◽  
André Knops
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Incorrect Response ◽  
Number Representation ◽  
Momentum Effect ◽  
Division Problems ◽  
Operational Momentum ◽  
Response Alternatives ◽  
Attentional Shifts ◽  
Fact Retrieval ◽  
Subsequent Target

When asked to estimate the outcome of arithmetic problems, participants overestimate for addition problems and underestimate for subtraction problems, both in symbolic and non-symbolic format. This bias is referred to as operational momentum effect (OM). The attentional shifts account holds that during computation of the outcome participants are propelled too far along a spatial number representation. OM was observed in non-symbolic multiplication and division while being absent in symbolic multiplication and division. Here, we investigate whether (a) the absence of the OM in symbolic multiplication and division was due to the presentation of the correct outcome amongst the response alternatives, putatively triggering verbally mediated fact retrieval, and whether (b) OM is correlated with attentional parameters, as stipulated by the attentional account. Participants were presented with symbolic and non-symbolic multiplication and division problems. Among seven incorrect response alternatives participants selected the most plausible result. Participants were also presented with a Posner task, with valid (70%), invalid (15%) and neutral (15%) cues pointing to the position at which a subsequent target would appear. While no OM was observed in symbolic format, non-symbolic problems were subject to OM. The non-symbolic OM was positively correlated with reorienting after invalid cues. These results provide further evidence for a functional association between spatial attention and approximate arithmetic, as stipulated by the attentional shifts account of OM. They also suggest that the cognitive processes underlying multiplication and division are less prone to spatial biases compared to addition and subtraction, further underlining the involvement of differential cognitive processes.

scholarly journals Retroactive Attentional Shifts Predict Performance in a Working Memory Task: Evidence by Lateralized EEG Patterns

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Göddertz ◽  
Laura-Isabelle Klatt ◽  
Christine Mertes ◽  
Daniel Schneider
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Attentional Shifts
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document