scholarly journals Visual detection of line segments: Two exceptions to the object superiority effect

1978 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Klein
Science ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 186 (4165) ◽  
pp. 752-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Weisstein ◽  
C. S. Harris

1980 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 521-525
Author(s):  
Mary Williams ◽  
Naomi Weisstein ◽  
James Brown

When a target consisting of a briefly flashed diagonal line segment is combined with a set of auxiliary lines (the context pattern) to yield the perception of a connected, three-dimensional object, it can be identified more accurately than when the context pattern yields a flatter, fragmented perception. This is the object-superiority effect (Weisstein & Harris, 1974). The present experiments utilized six context patterns that yielded significantly different ratings of perceived depth, and three context patterns that yielded significantly different ratings of perceived connectedness. Observers judged which of two target lines was presented; the line was briefly flashed alone or was accompanied by one of the nine context patterns. The context pattern appeared simultaneously or followed the target by a delay of 30 to 270 msec. Results showed that both the variations in perceived depth and the variations in perceived connectedness produced differences in metacontrast functions. Visual response to different spatial frequencies was also tested by blurring the stimuli — thus diminishing visual response to high spatial frequencies. Results showed that blurring the stimuli had dramatic effects on the temporal functions of accuracy versus delay of the context patterns varying in perceived depth (metacontrast functions): the functions for the patterns rated higher in depth became more like those for the flatter patterns. The differences in the metacontrast functions produced by connected versus fragmented patterns were maintained under image blurring. These results were closely related to the way perceived depth and connectedness ratings diminished as the context patterns were blurred. Our findings suggest that the visual channels that respond to high and low spatial frequencies also have different temporal responses to apparent three-dimensionality and connectedness.


Perception ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Weisstein ◽  
Mary C Williams ◽  
Charles S Harris

A briefly flashed line can be identified more accurately when it is part of certain types of pattern than in others (the ‘object-superiority effect’). Three experiments were designed to investigate what aspects of these patterns determine the facilitatory effect of context. Subjects identified which of four line segments was present in various briefly flashed figures. Other subjects rated the figures for three-dimensionality, connectedness, and ‘structural relevance’ of the target line. Little relationship was found between connectedness ratings and accuracy in the identification task, but accuracy was highly correlated with mean depth rating (accounting for 95% of the variance) and with mean structural-relevance rating (88%). Because of the high correlation ( r = 0·98) between these two judgments in the present experiments, and confounding with other stimulus variables in previously published studies, the relative importance of these two global attributes cannot yet be determined definitively (though there was some evidence that for these patterns depth judgments were primary and structural-relevance judgments derivative). A reexamination of pertinent research suggests that comparisons between well-matched stimuli (as in the object-superiority effect) are likely to be more robust and informative than comparisons between lines alone and in context (the ‘object-line effect’).


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Massol ◽  
K. Midgley ◽  
P. J. Holcomb ◽  
J. Grainger

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Cook ◽  
Carl Erick Hagmann
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document