scholarly journals Differential effects of a retention interval on latent inhibition and the habituation of an orienting response

1987 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Hall ◽  
Todd R. Schachtman
Keyword(s):  
Retention Interval ◽  
Latent Inhibition ◽  
Orienting Response ◽  
Differential Effects

Differential effects of lesions in medial and dorsal raphe of the rat: Latent inhibition and septohippocampal serotonin levels.

1980 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul R. Solomon ◽  
Gwen L. Nichols ◽  
Joseph M. Kiernan ◽  
Russell S. Kamer ◽  
Lawrence J. Kaplan
Keyword(s):  
Latent Inhibition ◽  
Dorsal Raphe ◽  
Differential Effects ◽  
Dorsal Raphé

The influence of selective lesions to components of the hippocampal system on the orienting response, habituation and latent inhibition

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 1405-1405
Author(s):  
C.J.P. Oswald ◽  
B.K. Yee ◽  
J.N.P. Rawlins ◽  
D.B. Bannerman ◽  
M. Good ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Latent Inhibition ◽  
Orienting Response ◽  
Response Habituation

Attenuation of Latent Inhibition by Post-Acquisition Reminder

1984 ◽  
Vol 36 (1b) ◽  
pp. 53-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley J. Kasprow ◽  
Doreen Catterson ◽  
Todd R. Schachtman ◽  
Ralph R. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Conditioned Stimulus ◽  
Retention Interval ◽  
White Noise ◽  
Latent Inhibition ◽  
Conditioning Phase ◽  
Retrieval Failure ◽  
Reminder Treatment ◽  
Lick Suppression ◽  
Treatment Shock

Using lick suppression by water-deprived rats as an associative index, white noise-footshock pairings resulted in less manifest conditioning when repeated non-reinforced presentations of the white noise preceded conditioning than when no stimulus pre-exposure was given, i.e., latent inhibition was observed. However, the latent inhibition deficit was reduced in animals who received as a reminder treatment shock-alone presentations in another context during the retention interval. Animals conditioned without prior stimulus pre-exposure and those exposed to the white noise and shock unpaired during the conditioning phase of the study showed no change in lick suppression as a result of the reminder treatment. These results suggest that the behavioural deficit produced by non-reinforced pre-exposure to the to-be-conditioned stimulus arises at least in part from a reversible retrieval failure rather than a lack of acquisition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document