scholarly journals Auditory motion aftereffects

1979 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Wesley Grantham ◽  
Frederic L. Wightman
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

Auditory motion aftereffects with a two‐component adapter

1998 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 2845-2845
Author(s):  
Hisashi Uematsu ◽  
Makio Kashino
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Two Component ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

scholarly journals Modulation frequency as a cue for auditory speed perception

2017 ◽  
Vol 284 (1858) ◽  
pp. 20170673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Senna ◽  
Cesare V. Parise ◽  
Marc O. Ernst
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Moving Objects ◽  
Modulation Frequency ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Neural Mechanisms ◽  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Motion Vision ◽  
Speed Perception ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

Unlike vision, the mechanisms underlying auditory motion perception are poorly understood. Here we describe an auditory motion illusion revealing a novel cue to auditory speed perception: the temporal frequency of amplitude modulation (AM-frequency), typical for rattling sounds. Naturally, corrugated objects sliding across each other generate rattling sounds whose AM-frequency tends to directly correlate with speed. We found that AM-frequency modulates auditory speed perception in a highly systematic fashion: moving sounds with higher AM-frequency are perceived as moving faster than sounds with lower AM-frequency. Even more interestingly, sounds with higher AM-frequency also induce stronger motion aftereffects. This reveals the existence of specialized neural mechanisms for auditory motion perception, which are sensitive to AM-frequency. Thus, in spatial hearing, the brain successfully capitalizes on the AM-frequency of rattling sounds to estimate the speed of moving objects. This tightly parallels previous findings in motion vision, where spatio-temporal frequency of moving displays systematically affects both speed perception and the magnitude of the motion aftereffects. Such an analogy with vision suggests that motion detection may rely on canonical computations, with similar neural mechanisms shared across the different modalities.

Auditory motion aftereffects with varying interaural time differences

1997 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 3105-3105
Author(s):  
Hisashi Uematsu ◽  
Makio Kashino ◽  
Tatsuya Hirahara
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Interaural Time Differences ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

Auditory motion aftereffects of approaching and withdrawing sound sources

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. G. Andreeva ◽  
E. S. Malinina
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Sound Sources ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

How well does natural motion induce auditory motion aftereffects?

1998 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 1798-1798
Author(s):  
Michael F. Neelon ◽  
Rick L. Jenison
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Natural Motion ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

Apparent Velocity of Motion Aftereffects in Central and Peripheral Vision

Perception ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 603-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Wright
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Peripheral Vision ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Motion Aftereffect ◽  
Apparent Velocity ◽  
Real Motion ◽  
Temporal Decay ◽  
Spatial Grain ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

Adapting to a drifting grating (temporal frequency 4 Hz, contrast 0.4) in the periphery gave rise to a motion aftereffect (MAE) when the grating was stopped. A standard unadapted foveal grating was matched to the apparent velocity of the MAE, and the matching velocity was approximately constant regardless of the visual field position and spatial frequency of the adapting grating. On the other hand, when the MAE was measured by nulling with real motion of the test grating, nulling velocity was found to increase with eccentricity. The nulling velocity was constant when scaled to compensate for changes in the spatial ‘grain’ of the visual field. Thus apparent velocity of MAE is constant across the visual field, but requires a greater velocity of real motion to cancel it in the periphery. This confirms that the mechanism underlying MAE is spatially-scaled with eccentricity, but temporally homogeneous. A further indication of temporal homogeneity is that when MAE is tracked, by matching or by nulling, the time course of temporal decay of the aftereffect is similar for central and for peripheral stimuli.

scholarly journals Auditory motion affects visual biological motion processing

2007 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Brooks ◽  
R. van der Zwan ◽  
A. Billard ◽  
B. Petreska ◽  
S. Clarke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biological Motion ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Auditory Motion
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document