Auditory motion aftereffects with varying interaural time differences

1997 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 3105-3105
Author(s):  
Hisashi Uematsu ◽  
Makio Kashino ◽  
Tatsuya Hirahara
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Interaural Time Differences ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

Auditory motion aftereffects with a two‐component adapter

1998 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 2845-2845
Author(s):  
Hisashi Uematsu ◽  
Makio Kashino
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Two Component ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

scholarly journals Modulation frequency as a cue for auditory speed perception

2017 ◽  
Vol 284 (1858) ◽  
pp. 20170673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Senna ◽  
Cesare V. Parise ◽  
Marc O. Ernst
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Moving Objects ◽  
Modulation Frequency ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Neural Mechanisms ◽  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Motion Vision ◽  
Speed Perception ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

Unlike vision, the mechanisms underlying auditory motion perception are poorly understood. Here we describe an auditory motion illusion revealing a novel cue to auditory speed perception: the temporal frequency of amplitude modulation (AM-frequency), typical for rattling sounds. Naturally, corrugated objects sliding across each other generate rattling sounds whose AM-frequency tends to directly correlate with speed. We found that AM-frequency modulates auditory speed perception in a highly systematic fashion: moving sounds with higher AM-frequency are perceived as moving faster than sounds with lower AM-frequency. Even more interestingly, sounds with higher AM-frequency also induce stronger motion aftereffects. This reveals the existence of specialized neural mechanisms for auditory motion perception, which are sensitive to AM-frequency. Thus, in spatial hearing, the brain successfully capitalizes on the AM-frequency of rattling sounds to estimate the speed of moving objects. This tightly parallels previous findings in motion vision, where spatio-temporal frequency of moving displays systematically affects both speed perception and the magnitude of the motion aftereffects. Such an analogy with vision suggests that motion detection may rely on canonical computations, with similar neural mechanisms shared across the different modalities.

scholarly journals Auditory motion aftereffects

1979 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Wesley Grantham ◽  
Frederic L. Wightman
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

Sequential Stream Segregation Affects Localisation of Diotic Tones among Tones with Time-Varying Interaural Time Difference

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p6369 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 1377-1385
Author(s):  
Takahiro Kawabe
Keyword(s):  
Interaural Time Difference ◽  
Stream Segregation ◽  
Frequency Difference ◽  
The Other ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Not Given ◽  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Interaural Time Differences ◽  
Complex Sound ◽  
Sound Image

In this study, I examined how sequential stream segregation contributes to the detection of diotic tones among tones with time-varying interaural time differences (ITDs). Target (T) and distractor (D) tones, and a silent duration (–) formed a sequence (DTD–) and this sequence was presented repeatedly. A frequency difference was introduced between target and distractor tones. The distractor tones were also given time-varying ITDs to produce a percept of smooth auditory motion along the interaural axis. In half of the trials, the target tones were not given time-varying ITDs, and thus were diotically presented. The task of the listeners was to determine whether the repeated sequences of DTD–had target tones without motion. The sensitivity d′ for the detection of diotic target tones was higher with larger frequency differences. On the other hand, the criterion c was lower with larger frequency differences. In another session, I confirmed that proportions of reports “two streams” was positively and negatively correlated with d′ and c, respectively. The results indicate that the localisation of a sound image could be influenced by sequential stream segregation in complex sound environments.

Auditory motion aftereffects of approaching and withdrawing sound sources

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. G. Andreeva ◽  
E. S. Malinina
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Sound Sources ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

How well does natural motion induce auditory motion aftereffects?

1998 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 1798-1798
Author(s):  
Michael F. Neelon ◽  
Rick L. Jenison
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Natural Motion ◽  
Motion Aftereffects
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document