scholarly journals Intravenous vitamin C in the supportive care of cancer patients: a review and rational approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 139 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Klimant ◽  
H. Wright ◽  
D. Rubin ◽  
D. Seely ◽  
M. Markman

This article reviews intravenous vitamin C (IV C) in cancer care and offers a rational approach to enable medical oncologists and integrative practitioners to safely provide IV C combined with oral vitamin C to patients. The use of IV C is a safe supportive intervention to decrease inflammation in the patient and to improve symptoms related to antioxidant deficiency, disease processes, and side effects of standard cancer treatments. A proposed rationale, together with relevant clinical safety considerations for the application of IV C in oncologic supportive care, is provided.

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Holford ◽  
Anitra C. Carr ◽  
Thomas H. Jovic ◽  
Stephen R. Ali ◽  
Iain S. Whitaker ◽  
...  

There are limited proven therapies for COVID-19. Vitamin C’s antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating effects make it a potential therapeutic candidate, both for the prevention and amelioration of COVID-19 infection, and as an adjunctive therapy in the critical care of COVID-19. This literature review focuses on vitamin C deficiency in respiratory infections, including COVID-19, and the mechanisms of action in infectious disease, including support of the stress response, its role in preventing and treating colds and pneumonia, and its role in treating sepsis and COVID-19. The evidence to date indicates that oral vitamin C (2–8 g/day) may reduce the incidence and duration of respiratory infections and intravenous vitamin C (6–24 g/day) has been shown to reduce mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, and time on mechanical ventilation for severe respiratory infections. Further trials are urgently warranted. Given the favourable safety profile and low cost of vitamin C, and the frequency of vitamin C deficiency in respiratory infections, it may be worthwhile testing patients’ vitamin C status and treating them accordingly with intravenous administration within ICUs and oral administration in hospitalised persons with COVID-19.


2003 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 529-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angus K. NIGHTINGALE ◽  
Daniel J. BLACKMAN ◽  
Rachel FIELD ◽  
Natalie J. GLOVER ◽  
Nicholas PEGGE ◽  
...  

Abnormalities of autonomic control of the cardiovascular system are seen in chronic heart failure (CHF) and confer a poor prognosis. Nitric oxide appears to be important in the regulation of baroreflex control in health and in disease states. The antioxidant vitamin C increases nitric oxide bioavailability in CHF. We evaluated the effects of vitamin C on baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) by sequence analysis in 100 CHF patients and 44 control subjects. Groups of 55 CHF patients and 22 controls were randomly allocated to receive a single intravenous injection of vitamin C (2 g) or placebo. In addition, 45 CHF patients were randomly allocated to receive a 4-week course of oral vitamin C (4 g/day) or placebo. An age-related reference range for BRS was developed in 22 healthy controls matched for age and gender to the CHF group. BRS was significantly impaired in the CHF group compared with age-matched older controls and young controls (6.9 ± 3.1, 12.5 ± 4.9 and 21.7 ± 9.1 mmHg/ms respectively; P < 0.001 between groups). Intravenous vitamin C acutely improved BRS in CHF patients by 24% (by 1.8 ± 4.1 mmHg/ms; P < 0.05), but not in controls. There was no improvement in BRS in CHF patients given chronic oral vitamin C. Thus acute intravenous, but not chronic oral, vitamin C improved BRS in CHF patients. There was no effect of intravenous vitamin C in healthy subjects, suggesting that the mechanism was either by free radical scavenging or due to central effects.


Author(s):  
Kavurgacı Suna ◽  
Şener Uzel Melahat ◽  
Yıldız Murat ◽  
Öztürk Ergür Figen ◽  
Öztürk Ayperi

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 774-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Mikirova ◽  
Ronald Hunnunghake ◽  
Ruth C. Scimeca ◽  
Charles Chinshaw ◽  
Faryal Ali ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-381
Author(s):  
Hui Peng ◽  
Dongfang Feng ◽  
Yingkai Wang ◽  
Zixi Dong ◽  
Qing Chen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Patrick Holford ◽  
Anitra Carr ◽  
Thomas H. Jovic ◽  
Stephen R. Ali ◽  
Iain S. Whitaker ◽  
...  

There are limited proven therapies for the treatment of COVID-19. Vitamin C&rsquo;s antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating effects, make it a potential therapeutic candidate, both for the prevention and amelioration of COVID-19 infection, and as an adjunctive therapy in the critical care of COVID-19, supporting anti-inflammatory treatment. This literature review focuses on vitamin C deficiency in respiratory infections including COVID-19; the mechanism of action in infectious disease and adrenal function supporting the anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticosteroids: its role in preventing and treating colds and pneumonia and its role in treating sepsis and COVID-19. The evidence to date indicates that oral vitamin C (2-8g/d) may reduce incidence and duration of respiratory infections and intravenous vitamin C (2-24g/d) has been shown to reduce mortality, Intensive Care Unit and hospital stays, time on mechanical ventilation in severe respiratory infections. Further trials are urgently warranted. Given the favourable safety profile and low cost of vitamin C, and frequency of vitamin C deficiency in respiratory infections it may be worthwhile testing patients&rsquo; vitamin C status and treating accordingly with intravenous use within ICUs and orally with doses between 2 and 8g/day in hospitalised and infected persons.


Author(s):  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Xin Rao ◽  
Yiming Li ◽  
Yuan Zhu ◽  
Fang Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundNo specific medication has been proven effective for the treatment of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here, we tested whether high-dose vitamin C infusion was effective for severe COVID-19.MethodsThis randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed at 3 hospitals in Hubei, China. Patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the ICU were randomly assigned in as 1:1 ratio to either the high-dose intravenous vitamin C (HDIVC) or the placebo. HDIVC group received 12 g of vitamin C/50 ml every 12 hours for 7 days at a rate of 12 ml/hour, and the placebo group received bacteriostatic water for injection in the same way. The primary outcome was invasive mechanical ventilation-free days in 28 days(IMVFD28). Secondary outcomes were 28-day mortality, organ failure, and inflammation progression.ResultsFifty-four critical COVID-19 patients were ultimately recruited. There was no difference in IMVFD28 between two groups. During the 7-day treatment period, patients in the HDIVC group had a steady rise in the PaO2/FiO2 (day 7: 229 vs. 151 mmHg, 95% CI 33 to 122, P = 0.01). Patients with SOFA scores ≥ 3 in the HDIVC group exhibited a significant reduction in 28-day mortality (P = 0.05) in univariate survival analysis. IL-6 in the VC group was lower than that in the placebo group (19.42 vs. 158.00; 95% CI -301.72 to -29.79; P = 0.04) on day 7.ConclusionThe addition of HDIVC may provide a protective clinical effect without any adverse events in critically ill patients with COVID-19.Clinicaltrial.gov identifer: NCT04264533


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jördis Maria Zill ◽  
Jörg Dirmaier ◽  
Matthias Augustin ◽  
Sarah Dwinger ◽  
Eva Christalle ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease that is often associated with a number of somatic and mental comorbidity. Patients with psoriasis show an increased risk of depression and (social) anxiety. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study are 1) to explore the psychosocial distress of patients with psoriasis and to assess their care needs; and 2) to develop a supportive intervention based on the prior results. METHODS A multi-stage design with four phases combining quantitative and qualitative methodology will be used and conducted in two centers. 1) A scoping review and focus groups will be used to design a questionnaire to assess the psychosocial distress and care needs of the patients. 2) The questionnaire developed in phase 1 will be used in a cross-sectional survey to assess the extent of psychosocial distress and supportive care needs in 400 patients with psoriasis. 3) A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted to identify psychosocial and psychoeducational interventions for patients with psoriasis and to describe their effectiveness. 4) Based on the results of the phases 2 and 3 a manualized supportive intervention will be developed and the feasibility and acceptance of the intervention will be assessed. RESULTS Currently, phase 1 of the project has been completed and the recruitment for phase 2 has been started. The systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 are conducted simultaneously to phase 2 and results are expected soon. Phase 4 has not been started yet. CONCLUSIONS The expected results of this study will show the extent of psychosocial distress of patients with psoriasis in Germany and supplement previous research with findings about the supportive care needs of this patient group. Moreover, the developed intervention will help to address the psychosocial support needs of patients with psoriasis. Research shows that psychosocial support is strongly needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document