scholarly journals Unfair Competition Offence in the Turkish Commercial Code

Author(s):  
Çetin Arslan ◽  
Didar Özdemir ◽  
Ethem Atay

The competition is the key element of the free market economy because the prices cannot be determined according to the supply and demand equilibrium when there is no competition or the competition is violated by conducts against good faith. In this regard, the fraudulent acts between providers and customers and unfair commercial applications constitute tortious acts. The aim of the articles embodying unfair competition of the Turkish Commercial Code (TCC) dated 13.01.2011 and numbered 6102 is to maintain fair, untainted competition for the good of all parties (art. 54/2). The acts and commercial applications against good faith are determined in the article 55 of the TCC in order to protect the competition system. According to the article 62 of the TCC entitled “Criminal Acts”, performing one of these acts intentionally; giving wrong or deceptive information about his personal situation, goods, products, commercial activity and work intentionally in order to make his own offer preferred; deceiving employees, administrators and other assistants to obtain the production and commercial secrets of the employer or clients; not preventing the unfair competition acts of the workers, employees or administrators during their work or not correcting the declarations contrary to facts constitute the unfair competition offence. In our study, at first the notion of unfair competition, then the unfair competition offence –especially focusing on the controversial points- will be examined.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 309-322
Author(s):  
Ece Deniz Gunay ◽  
Gozde Engin Gunay

This paper presents a comparative analysis between Turkish and Azerbaijani law systems and it attempts to evaluate whether the usage of standardised terms of contract in a way that causes the infringement of the principle of good faith forming unfair competition. Standardised terms are pre-prepared without negotiating with the other contracting parties. The paper highlights that the two countries have strong connections, especially in economic and commercial terms which render even more important convergence of legal regulations. In this respect, upon examining the regulations on standardised terms and unfair competition and considering the fact that the two systems have similar approaches regarding standardised terms, the paper suggests that the usage of standardised terms in a manner that violates good faith should be qualified as unfair competition under Azerbaijani law in accordance with Article 55/1(f) of the Turkish Commercial Code. The paper assesses the issue in conjunction with the Turkish Commercial Code, Turkish Code of Obligations, the Civil Code of Azerbaijan (Mulki Mecelle) and Code on Unfair Competition. The scope of the protection that is envisaged in the relevant Turkish and Azerbaijani codes is studied from consumers’ and merchants’ aspects, respectively. The paper inter alia assesses that protecting all market participants is the most effective way to provide market balance. The paper aims to contribute to the improvement of the economic relations of Turkey and Azerbaijan via its suggestion on harmonising the two law systems in terms of unfair competition regulations.   Keywords: Banks, merchant-consumer, principle of good faith, standardised terms of contract, unfair competition.   Cite as: Gunay, E. D., & Gunay, G. E. (2021). The Turkish and Azerbaijani laws on unfair competition via standardised terms of contract – Assessments and suggestions. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 6(1), 309-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol6iss1pp309-322


Author(s):  
Çetin Arslan ◽  
Didar Özdemir

The Turkish Penal Code (TPC) no.5237 embodies “the reveal of confidential business information and documents” as a crime. However, neither article 6 of the TPC titled “definitions” nor the legal justification of the article contains the definition of the confidential business information or commercial secret. The abrogated Turkish Commercial Code no.6762 disposes the reveal of this kind of information as an act of unfair competition. In a similar vein, the current Turkish Commercial Code no.6102 assumes the illegal acquisition and the reveal of business secrets as acts of unfair competition and subjects them to criminal sanction. Also the article 562 of the TCC no.6102 disposes that if the auditors reveal the confidential business information of the auditee company, they are punished according to the article 239 of the TPC. The Proposal of Code on Business, Bank and Client Secrets refers to the article 239 of the TPC in case of the violation of the confidentiality obligation. Finally, the Act of the Protection of Competition no.4054 brings a confidentiality obligation for the Council and staff members. In this study, we will try to explain first the notion of confidential business information or commercial secret, then the penal norms about the confidential business information and the confidentiality obligation and last, the elements of the crime disposed in the article 239 of the TPC which is referred by most of the other penal norms in this respect.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (56) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Jordi Gracía VINÃ

RESUMENEl respeto a la competencia entre empresas es uno de los elementos esenciales del sistema de libre mercado. Por esta razón, el Ordenamiento Jurídico tiene mucho interés en regular medidas que eliminen cualquier conducta que suponga una intromisión. Este es el objetivo de la prohibición de competencia desleal que el Estatuto de los Trabajadores regula como deber de los trabajadores en España. Summary: Respect for competition between companies is one of the essential elements of the free market system. For this reason, the Legal Order is very interested in regulating measures that eliminate any conduct that implies any interference. This is the objective of the prohibition of unfair competition that the Workers' Statute regulates as duty of employees in Spain.PALABRAS CLAVE: Buena Fe; Trabajador; Competencia Desleal. ABSTRACTRespect for competition between companies is one of the essential elements of the free market system. For this reason, the Legal Order is very interested in regulating measures that eliminate any conduct that implies an interference. This is the objective of the prohibition of unfair competition that the Workers' Statute regulates as a duty of workers in Spain. Summary: Respect for competition between companies is one of the essential elements of the free market system. For this reason, the Legal Order is very interested in regulating measures that eliminate any conduct that implies any interference. This is the objective of the prohibition of unfair competition that the Workers' Statute regulates the duty of employees in Spain.KEYWORDS: Good Faith; Employee; Unfair Competition. RESUMOO respeito pela concorrência entre empresas é um dos elementos essenciais do sistema de mercado livre. Por essa razão, o Departamento Jurídico está muito interessado em regulamentar medidas que eliminem qualquer conduta que implique uma interferência. Este é o objetivo da proibição da concorrência desleal que o Estatuto dos Trabalhadores regula como um dever dos trabalhadores na Espanha. Resumo: O respeito pela concorrência entre empresas é um dos elementos essenciais do sistema de mercado livre. Por esta razão, o Decreto está muito interessado em regulamentar medidas que eliminem qualquer conduta que implique qualquer interferência. Este é o objetivo da proibição da concorrência desleal de que o Estatuto dos Trabalhadores regule o dever dos empregados na Espanha.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Boa Fé, Empregado, Concorrência Desleal.


Author(s):  
Çetin Arslan ◽  
Didar Özdemir

In a regular free market economy, the prices of goods and services occur at the point where the quantities of supply and demand get up with one another. On the other hand, it can be in question the distortion of this equilibration by various purposes and practices. In this case, optimal goods and services cannot be received under optimum conditions. As a conclusion of “ultima ratio” principle in the criminal law, every illegal conduct in this context does not constitute a crime but some fraudulent ones are imposed a sanction. The crimes of “fraud” in articles 157-158, “fraudulent bankruptcy” in article 161, “bid rigging” in article 235, “rigging during the discharge of contractual obligation” in article 236 and “manipulation on prices” in article 237 of Turkish Penal Code are some of the examples which can be given in this context. In this study, “crime of manipulation on prices” which is not dwelled on adequately in the doctrine is examined by featuring the controversial points.


Author(s):  
Mustafa Aksu

The Trademark Decree-Law constitutes an important component in the alignment of Turkish trademark law with European laws concerning intellectual property. According to the Trademark Decree-Law, protection is only possible for registered trademarks (Trademark Decree-Law, Article 6). Unregistered trademarks must instead rely on the unfair competition law provisions of Articles 54 to 63 of the Turkish Commercial Code (hereinafter TComC).


Author(s):  
Julio H. Cole

Milton Friedman, who died in the early morning of November 16, 2006, was a world-famous economist, and an ardent and effective advocate of the free market economy. Much of his celebrity derived from his role as public intellectual, an aspect of his work that was reflected largely in popular books, such as Capitalism and Freedom (1962) and the hugely successful Free to Choose (1980) -both co-authored with his wife, Rose (and the latter based on the television documentary of the same title)- and in the Newsweek opinion columns he wrote for many years. Though he was already well-known by the time he received the Nobel Prize in Economics, in 1976, both his stature as public figure and his effectiveness as policy advocate were greatly enhanced by that award, and this is what has been mostly stressed in the vast outpouring of obituaries and public testimonials prompted by his recent passing. It is important to recall, however, that there was another aspect of his career, one which most professional economists (and probably Friedman himself) would regard as far more important than his incursions in the policy arena. Indeed, even if "Friedman the public intellectual" had never existed, "Friedman the economic scientist" would still be renowned and respected (though perhaps not as a bona fide world-class celebrity), and his memory will live long in the lore of economics It is primarily this other aspect of his life and work that I wish to focus on in this essay.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-141
Author(s):  
Tomasz Stępniewski

The present paper discusses the following research questions: to what extent did errors made by the previous presidents of Ukraine result in the country’s failure to introduce systemic reforms (e.g. combating corruption, the development of a foundation for a stable state under the rule of law and free-market economy)?; can it be ventured that the lack of radical reforms along with errors in the internal politics of Ukraine under Petro Poroshenko resulted in the president’s failure?; will the strong vote of confidence given to Volodymyr Zelensky and the Servant of the People party exact systemic reforms in Ukraine?; or will Volodymyr Zelensky merely become an element of the oligarchic political system in Ukraine?


Wacana Publik ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syamsul Ma'arif

After had being carried out nationalization and hostility against west countries, the New Order regime made important decision to change Indonesia economic direction from etatism system to free market economy. A set of policies were taken in order private sector could play major role in economic. However, when another economic sectors were reformed substantially, effords to reform the State Owned Enterprises had failed. The State Owned Enterprise, in fact, remained to play dominant role like early years of guided democracy era. Role of the State Owned Enterprises was more and more powerfull). The main problem of reforms finally lied on reality that vested interest of bureaucrats (civil or military) was so large that could’nt been overcome. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (15) ◽  
pp. 520-540
Author(s):  
Gökhan GÜNCAN

Abolished Commercial Code No. 6762 art. 137 limited the entitlement of commercial companies to the “subject of activity” included in the company's articles of association. Transactions exceeding the scope of operation written in the company's articles of association were deemed to be ultra vires transactions and were deemed null and void. Since the transactions that were deemed null and void were not available in the legal world, it was not possible to make them valid again. Because, a legal transaction that does not exist is invalid from the very beginning; even if the interests of all parties require it, it is not possible to validate the transaction with approval or authorization. Therefore, since transactions outside the scope of business of commercial companies were also considered null and void, there was no approval or ratification procedure that could make them valid. The only way to carry out the aforementioned transaction in a valid manner was to change the articles of association, regulate the company's field of activity to include the aforementioned transaction, and re-do the transaction from the beginning. In the Turkish Commercial Code no. 6102 art. 125 provision emphasized that commercial companies have legal personality, as in article 137 of the abolished Commercial Code no. 6762. However, unlike the abolished one, by eliminating the ultra vires principle, which is a limit to the competence of commercial companies. It has been widely accepted in the meaning of Turkish Civil Code art. 48. This issue was also included in the Turkish Commercial Code no:6102 art. 125 justification, and it was stated that the ultravires principle was abolished. Therefore, it is understood that the ultravires principle was abandoned as a result of the conscious choice of the Lawgiver. The subject of business is no longer a limiting element of the legal capacity of commercial companies. Despite this, the subject of business still maintains its importance for trading companies. Turkish Commercial Code no:6102 art. 213, which regulates the mandatory elements of the articles of association of commercial companies, in the provisions of 339 and 5 76, the subject of activity continues to maintain its place as a mandatory element that should be included in the articles of association. In the aforementioned provisions, among the mandatory elements to be included in the articles of association, as a common expression in the aforementioned company types, the phrase "business subject in a specified and defined manner" is used. The subject of operation is also in the Turkish Commercial Code no. 6102 art. 233 and in the provisions of art. 371, it remains as a factor limiting the representation authority of those authorized to represent the company. When these provisions are evaluated, it is understood that although the ultra vires principle has been abandoned in terms of the competence of commercial companies, the principle continues to be preserved in terms of representation. In the study, the provisions of abolished Commercial Code no:6762 art. 137, which limits the license of commercial companies to the subject of activity and art. 128, which defines the license in the broadest sense, were determined as the starting point, and the provisions regulating the authority of representation of commercial companies were examined. Thus, the effects of the ultra vires principle on the competence and representation of commercial companies have been comparatively examined within the framework of the abolished Commercial Code No. 6762 and the current Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document