scholarly journals CLINICAL SYNDROMES OF THE THALAMIC STROKE IN THE CLASSICAL VASCULAR TERRITORIES: A PROSPECTIVE HOSPITAL-BASED COHORT STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 489-493
Author(s):  
Maria M. Prokopiv ◽  
Olena Y. Fartushna
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Academic Hospital ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Study Materials ◽  
Thalamic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Syndromes ◽  
Neurological Features ◽  
Vascular Syndromes

The aim: We aimed to determine, describe, and analyze the clinical and neuroimaging features of vascular syndromes of acute thalamic stroke in the classical vascular territories in a prospective hospital-based cohort study. Materials and methods: We have prospectively recruited 319 acute stroke patients, admitted to the Neurological Center at an academic hospital (Oleksandrivska Clinical Hospital) in Kyiv, Ukraine. Complex neurological, clinical, laboratory, ultrasound, and neuroimaging examinations were performed to all study patients within 24 hours since the symptoms onset. Results: MRI/CT-proven thalamic stroke was diagnosed in 34 (10.6%) out of 319 patients, forming a study group. Twenty-two out of 34 patients (average age 61.9 ± 10.2 years) were diagnosed with an acute isolated ischemic thalamic stroke, and 12 patients (average age 59.0 ± 9.6 years) were diagnosed with an acute thalamic hemorrhage. Conclusions: Specific neurological features of clinical vascular syndromes of acute thalamic stroke in the classical vascular territories were analyzed, compared, and described.

scholarly journals In-Hospital Intravenous Thrombolysis Offers No Benefit in Mechanical Thrombectomy in Optimized Tertiary Stroke Center Setting

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juha-Pekka Pienimäki ◽  
Jyrki Ollikainen ◽  
Niko Sillanpää ◽  
Sara Protto
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Stroke Center

Abstract Purpose Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the first-line treatment in acute stroke patients presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO). The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to MT is being contested. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MT without IVT in patients with no contraindications to IVT presenting directly to a tertiary stroke center with acute anterior circulation LVO. Materials and Methods We collected the data of 106 acute stroke patients who underwent MT in a single high-volume stroke center. Patients with anterior circulation LVO eligible for IVT and directly admitted to our institution who subsequently underwent MT were included. We recorded baseline clinical, laboratory, procedural, and imaging variables and technical, imaging, and clinical outcomes. The effect of intravenous thrombolysis on 3-month clinical outcome (mRS) was analyzed with univariate tests and binary and ordinal logistic regression analysis. Results Fifty-eight out of the 106 patients received IVT + MT. These patients had 2.6-fold higher odds of poorer clinical outcome in mRS shift analysis (p = 0.01) compared to MT-only patients who had excellent 3-month clinical outcome (mRS 0–1) three times more often (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences between the groups in process times, mTICI, or number of hemorrhagic complications. A trend of less distal embolization and higher number of device passes was observed among the MT-only patients. Conclusions MT without prior IVT was associated with an improved overall three-month clinical outcome in acute anterior circulation LVO patients.

ROLE OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCAN IN EVALUATION OF NEUROLOGICAL MANIFESTATIONS IN COVID 19 POSITIVE PATIENTS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH D-DIMER VALUE AND GCS: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN CENTRAL INDIA

2021 ◽  
pp. 17-21
Author(s):  
Debraj Saha ◽  
Aarti Anand ◽  
Jawahar Rathod ◽  
Prajwaleet Gour ◽  
Shivprasad Jaybhay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Neurological Symptoms ◽  
Government Medical College ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Neuro Imaging ◽  
D Dimer

Objective: To investigate the incidence and spectrum of neuroimaging ndings and their prognostic role in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Government Medical College Nagpur along with their correlation with D-Dimer Values and GCS . Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 774 COVID-19 conrmed patients admitted to Government Medical College st st Nagpur between 1 April 2020 and 31 October 2020. Clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records, and particularly data of all neurological symptoms were extracted from the imaging reports. Four neuro-radiologists evaluated all neuroimaging studies for acute neuroimaging ndings related to COVID-19. Plasma D-dimer levels were measured using a particle-enhanced, immunoturbidimetric assay on admission in the 116 patients who came for evaluation of neurological symptoms. Moreover ,the patients were classied into different groups as mild, moderate and severe based on their GCS scores and was assessed with respect to their neuro-imaging ndings. Results: 15 % of the admitted patients suffered from neurological symptoms. Acute stroke was the most common nding in the patients with positive neuroimaging ndings resulting in 34.4% of the patients with positive neuroimaging ndings. Other ndings were subacute infarcts (13.8%), Chronic lacunar infarcts (20.6%) , Intraparenchymal hemorrhage in 10.4 %, hypertensive encephalopathy in 7 % and subarachanoid hemorrhage in 3.4 %. Plasma median D-dimer levels were signicantly (P฀ =฀ 0.000) higher in Acute stroke patients as compared to COVID 19 positive patients who had negative CT scan imaging features(0.88; interquartile range [IQR], 0.28–2.11 mg/L and 0.31; IQR, 0.17–0.74 mg/L). Patients who have positive neuroimaging ndings presented with a lower GCS whereas patients who had negative neuroimaging ndings presented with a higher GCS. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates acute stroke is the most common neuroloimaging nding in hospitalized COVID 19 Patients. Moreover D-Dimer values are highly predictive of acute ischemic stroke. Patients with positive neuro-imaging ndings have poor GCS scores.

scholarly journals The Presence of Visual Neglect after Thrombolytic Treatment in Patients with Right Hemisphere Stroke

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Kettunen ◽  
M. Nurmi ◽  
A.-M. Koivisto ◽  
P. Dastidar ◽  
M. Jehkonen
Keyword(s):  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Thrombolytic Treatment ◽  
Visual Neglect ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Neuropsychological Examination ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Right Hemisphere Stroke

Visual neglect (VN) is a common consequence of right hemisphere (RH) stroke. The aims of this study were to explore the presence of VN after RH stroke in the patients with (T+) or without (T−) thrombolytic treatment, and to determine whether thrombolysis is a predictor of VN. The study group consisted of 77 RH infarct patients. VN was evaluated with six conventional subtests of the Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT). Stroke severity was assessed using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). In the neuropsychological examination, 22% of all RH stroke patients had VN. VN was present in 15% of the patients in the T+ group and in 28% of the patients in the T− group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Despite that, patients in the T− group had a higher risk of VN than patients in the T+ group. Our results suggest that thrombolysis independently predicted absence of VN.

scholarly journals Code status documentation at admission in COVID-19 patients: a descriptive cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e050268
Author(s):  
Saskia Briedé ◽  
Harriet M R van Goor ◽  
Titus A P de Hond ◽  
Sonja E van Roeden ◽  
Judith M Staats ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Academic Hospital ◽  
Medical Field ◽  
Intensive Care Admission ◽  
Code Status ◽  
Public Media ◽  
Treatment Limitation

ObjectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic pressurised healthcare with increased shortage of care. This resulted in an increase of awareness for code status documentation (ie, whether limitations to specific life-sustaining treatments are in place), both in the medical field and in public media. However, it is unknown whether the increased awareness changed the prevalence and content of code status documentation for COVID-19 patients. We aim to describe differences in code status documentation between infectious patients before the pandemic and COVID-19 patients.SettingUniversity Medical Centre of Utrecht, a tertiary care teaching academic hospital in the Netherlands.ParticipantsA total of 1715 patients were included, 129 in the COVID-19 cohort (a cohort of COVID-19 patients, admitted from March 2020 to June 2020) and 1586 in the pre-COVID-19 cohort (a cohort of patients with (suspected) infections admitted between September 2016 to September 2018).Primary and secondary outcome measuresWe described frequency of code status documentation, frequency of discussion of this code status with patient and/or family, and content of code status.ResultsFrequencies of code status documentation (69.8% vs 72.7%, respectively) and discussion (75.6% vs 73.3%, respectively) were similar in both cohorts. More patients in the COVID-19 cohort than in the before COVID-19 cohort had any treatment limitation as opposed to full code (40% vs 25%). Within the treatment limitations, ‘no intensive care admission’ (81% vs 51%) and ‘no intubation’ (69% vs 40%) were more frequently documented in the COVID-19 cohort. A smaller difference was seen in ‘other limitation’ (17% vs 9%), while ‘no resuscitation’ (96% vs 92%) was comparable between both periods.ConclusionWe observed no difference in the frequency of code status documentation or discussion in COVID-19 patients opposed to a pre-COVID-19 cohort. However, treatment limitations were more prevalent in patients with COVID-19, especially ‘no intubation’ and ‘no intensive care admission’.

scholarly journals Clomiphene Citrate Priming Increases Sensitivity During Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shan Liu ◽  
Xinyu Liu ◽  
Huanhuan Li ◽  
Minghui Liu ◽  
Yasu Lv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Clomiphene Citrate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Poor Ovarian Responders ◽  
Gonadotropin Dosage ◽  
Antagonist Protocol

Abstract Background: Since ovarian stimulation was introduced as an assisted reproductive technology, poor ovarian response (POR) management has challenged clinicians. Guidance on optimally managing patients with poor response and/or low sensitivity to ovarian stimulation is still lacking. We aimed to investigate whether a clomiphene citrate (CC) priming protocol could increase ovarian sensitivity in poor ovarian responders. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 294 patients (374 ovarian stimulation cycles). Of these, 193 cycles were treated by a CC priming antagonist protocol (study group) and 181 by the classical flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol (control group). Stimulation data and laboratory and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: Total gonadotropin dosage and dosage per follicle were considerably lower, the follicle-to-oocyte index was significantly higher, and the gonadotropin duration was shorter in the study group. After adjusting for potential confounders, multivariate regression analysis showed that cumulative ongoing pregnancy remained comparable between the groups (adjusted odds ratio: 0.761, 95% confidence interval: 0.300-1.933, P = 0.566). Age, body mass index, gonadotropin dosage per follicle, and the follicle-to-oocyte index were directly associated with the reproductive outcomes. The result of the sensitivity analysis showed that patients stimulated by the CC priming antagonist protocol were administered less gonadotropin (1,739.09 ± 719.39 vs. 3,114.77 ± 1,171.23, P < 0.001) at a lower gonadotropin dosage per follicle (637.36 ± 373.05 vs. 1286.26 ± 976.66, P < 0.001) and for a shorter duration (6.58 ± 2.23 vs. 9.80 ± 1.90, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The CC priming antagonist protocol offered a convenient and patient-friendly way to increase ovarian sensitivity during ovarian stimulation in poor ovarian responders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document