scholarly journals GENITAL MUTILATION AS A CONSEQUENCE OF CRIMINAL OFFENCE AGAINST A PERSON

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-118
Author(s):  
Igor І. Mytrofanov ◽  
Igor V. Lysenko ◽  
Kateryna V. Hryn ◽  
Mykola М. Ryabushko

The aim: The paper is aimed at creation of a procedure for determining the loss of any body organ or its functions, genital mutilation, as the signs of grievous bodily harm, penalty for which is stipulated by the Article 121 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, as well as establishing the possibilities of legal setting of the concept of “genital mutilation”. Materials and methods: Over 100 criminal proceedings, involving forensic medical examination, under the Article 121 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine for the period from 2007 to 19.05.2019 have been studied. Common methods of research have been used, namely, the analysis and synthesis, statistical method, as well as own observations of the process of judicial examination of the above criminal proceedings, as well as individual interviews, survey of the victims and their family members in total of 39 people. Results and conclusions: The findings of the investigation enabled detecting the gaps in the regulation of the procedure to define genital mutilation as a characteristic feature of grievous bodily harm. The ways of further improvement of the procedure of conducting expert studies of genital mutilation as a characteristic feature of bodily harm, which facilitates avoiding of errors in forensic medical and judicial practices have been found. The process of criminalization of the illegal conduct of surgical operations, resulted in mutilation of genitalia, must take place with the mandatory involvement of specialists in the field of practical medicine, as well as medical scientists specializing in sexopathology, gynecology, oncogynecology, forensic medicine in order to avoid errors in the lawmaking.

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 862-867
Author(s):  
Igor І. Mytrofanov ◽  
Igor V. Lysenko ◽  
Mykola М. Ryabushko

Introduction: Among crimes against human health we distinguish serious bodily harms, one of the signs of which is recognized as a mental illness. The aim: The paper was aimed at the development of the procedure for determining the mental disorder of a victim as a sign of a serious bodily harm, as well as the establishing the possibilities of clarifying the legislative formulation of the above norm of the Criminal Code. Materials and methods: Over 300 criminal proceedings under the Arts.121, 122 and 125 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine for the period from 2007 to 2018 have been studied. For this purpose, common methods of research have been used, namely, the analysis and synthesis, as well as own observations of the process of consideration of the above criminal proceedings. Results and conclusions: The findings of the study assisted in identification of gaps in the regulation of the procedure to define mental illness as a characteristic feature of serious bodily harm. The ways of further improvement of the procedure of conducting expert studies of mental illness as a characteristic feature of a serious bodily harm. The rules for determining the psychic (mental) illness that are recognized by us as archaic and that does not correspond to the established procedure of such definition by the comprehensive forensic medical and forensic psychiatric examination involving a forensic medical expert, two or three psychiatrists (narcologists), summarizing in the conclusion of the presence of mental illness in a person, assessed by experts as a characteristic feature of serious bodily harm should be changed.


Author(s):  
Kateryna Katerynchuk ◽  
Olga Bespal

The article deals with the problems of qualification of particular crimes against person’s health, which is provided by Section II of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Particularly, special attention is given to the delimitation of related crime structures, namely: grievous bodily harm (part 1 a. 121, 128) and negligent homicide (a. 119) from illegal abortion (a. 134); bodily injury (a.a. 121, 122, 125) from being left in danger (a.135), violation of patient rights (a. 141), unethical human experimentation (a. 142), violation of the established order of organ and tissue transplantation (a. 143), illegal medical activities (a. 138); forced donation (a. 144), from premeditated murder, negligent homicide and premeditated grievous bodily injury (a.a. 115, 119, 121); qualification features of illegal disclosure of medical information are considered (a. 145). The distinguishing features of the articles are investigated: the article 116 (the premeditated murder of emotional excitement) and 123 (premeditated grievous bodily harm of intense emotional excitement); the correlation of several special rules is installed among themselves (a. 123, 124 and p.2 of a.121). Suggestions were made regarding to the qualification of grievous bodily harm in the commission of other crimes, as many articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine provide «serious consequences», which are some of the most uncertain and controversial and require further study. In practice, the provision of criminal law theory and qualification rules are not always taken into account, and provision of by-laws is outdated. Therefore, the criteria for delineation of some crimes against human's health were analyzed. Their particular features (objective and subjective) are established and they took the role of distinguishing features. Key words:personal health, crime, harm to health, personal injury.


Introduction. The article provides a criminal law characteristic of violence as a category of the General Part of the legislation on criminal responsibility. In particular, its role and significance in cases of application of the rule that determines the responsibility of persons who perform a special task to prevent or detect criminally illegal activities of organized groups and criminal organizations is considered. It is accentuated that violence in this norm, as well as in other norms that provide for circumstances that exclude criminal unlawfulness of the action, has the following meaning: characterizes the factual and legal basis of circumstances that exclude criminal unlawfulness; determines the use of violence against a person as grounds for "unlimited" use of force for protection; establishes that in some cases, excessive use of force leads to criminal prosecution. Summary of the main research results. The analysis of the current criminal legislation of Ukraine allowed the author to conclude that severe and especially severe consequences prescribed in Part 2 of Art. 43 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine characterized not only by physical damage, but also its other types, for example, by property, organizational and so on. In addition, the legislation does not clearly dividing the consequences to severe and particularly severe. In most cases, they coincide, and in practice there are difficulties in delimitation them. To solve this problem, it is proposed to specify the consequences of exceeding the limits by a person performing a special task. This can only be the most dangerous harm to a person, which is to take his life (murder) and inflict grievous bodily harm. The meaning of the term "compulsion" in the corresponding norm is investigated. According to the author, compulsion is an element of the objective side of criminal offenses committed during the performance of a special task, namely the circumstance of the commission of such offenses. These are the specific objective-presentive conditions in which a criminal offense is committed. In fact, the compulsion of harm causing during a special task is due to two factors: the final goal that characterizes a person's behavior - prevention or detection of criminally illegal activity of an organized group or criminal organization and the situation in which the person operates. The article states that an important characteristic of illegal behavior, namely its subjective side, is the motives and purpose of a person's actions. The closest (immediate) goal is to avoid detecting, to ensure the security of their stay in an organized criminal group or criminal organization. The final goal is to prevent and detect criminally illegal activity of an organized group or criminal organization. The article considers the concepts of "detection of criminal offenses" and "prevention of criminal offenses". On the basis of researches of modern works which are devoted to the given subject the author's definitions of these terms are given. It is also given the author's wording of part 2 of Art. 43 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which determines the conditions of criminal responsibility of persons performing a special task. Conclusions. The article makes scientifically substantiated conclusions and provides author's recommendations for improving the current legislation on criminal responsibility, in particular, clearly defines exceeding the limits in this circumstance, which can only be murder or grievous bodily harm; the author's definition of the concept "disclosure of criminally illegal activity" is given; indicated that in criminal offenses committed by persons performing a special task, motive and purpose are mandatory features of the subjective side.


Author(s):  
Ihor Oheruk

Purpose. The purpose of the work is to analyze the application of the second and third parts of Article 3692 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine to officials in the context, that defines them by the Criminal Code of Ukraine in the note to Article 364 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Methodology. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and synthesis of the available scientific and theoretical material and the formulation of relevant conclusions and recommendations. In the course of the study, the following methods of scientific knowledge were used: terminological, logical-semantic, system-structural, logical-normative. Results: in the course of research the cause of criminalization of such act as "abuse of power" is considered, the subject of the specified criminal act which has the features of "an official" in the context, that defines it by the note to Article 364 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is analyzed and the main ways of committing criminal acts, that are provided for in this article of the Criminal Code of Ukraine are identified. Originality. The study found, that one of the key conditions for the opportunity to influence officials, that are authorized to perform government or local self-government functions, is the position held by the official and the related opportunities. Therefore, taking into account the opinion of the scientists, that the subject of crimes, that are provided for by the second and third parts of Article 3692 is special, the peculiarities of which is the cumulative feature, that denotes, that such person is not endowed with the status of an official, well-founded need to specify the criminal legislation of Ukraine in terms of the application the second and third parts of Article 3692 of the Criminal code of Ukraine concerning officials in the context, that defines them by the criminal legislation of Ukraine in the note to Article 364 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Practical significance. The research results can be used in lawmaking in the improvement of anti-corruption legislation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-108
Author(s):  
Jarosław Marciniak

Discontinuation of proceedings under Article 59a of the Criminal Code is a new institution in Polish criminal law. This article discusses selected issues relating to the premises for the application of Article 59a of the Criminal Code in practice. In view of the use by the legislator in Article 59a of the Criminal Code of concepts with vague meanings, their possible interpretations were proposed. It has been suggested that a rephrasing of the provision in question should be considered, in order to ensure the possibility of applying the said institution to a wider range of misdemeanours, as compensatory discontinuation is intended by the legislator to fulfil the redress function of proceedings and ensure the effectiveness and speed of criminal proceedings


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 92-98
Author(s):  
O. А. Zaytsev ◽  

The article examines the problematic issues of applying measures to protect the rights and legitimate interests of entrepreneurs in cases of crimes in the field of economic activity. The material-legal and criminal-procedural mechanisms used in the course of proceedings in this category of cases are examined. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the legal positions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, reflected in the decisions of the Plenum of November 15, 2016 № 48 and October 3, 2017 № 33. The purpose of this study is to identify the most acceptable areas of activity of judicial and law enforcement agencies to protect the rights and legitimate interests of entrepreneurs involved in criminal proceedings. The objectives of the study are: a) to determine the specifics of criminal and criminal procedure legislation containing humane mechanisms for the category of cases under consideration; b) to highlight the positions of scientists who conduct research in this field of activity; с) substantiation of recommendations for the further development of criminal policy in the direction of liberalizing the current structure of crimes in conjunction with the improvement of criminal procedural forms of criminal proceedings. The methodological basis of the research was the dialectical method of cognition, General scientific methods of abstraction, analysis and synthesis, as well as special legal methods. Promising ways of development of criminal policy in the field of formation of legislation that allows the most effective protection of the rights and legitimate interests of entrepreneurs are proposed. The conclusion is made about the need for further scientific study of the system of material-legal and criminal-procedural mechanisms used in the proceedings on crimes committed in the sphere of business and other economic activities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 1396-1400
Author(s):  
Igor І. Mytrofanov ◽  
Igor V. Lysenko ◽  
Mykola М. Riabushko ◽  
Volodymyr H. Hryn ◽  
Roman M. Riabushko ◽  
...  

The aim: The paper is aimed at creation of the procedure and criteria for determining a health disorder associated with permanent disability as a sign of serious bodily harm. Materials and methods: To identify the problems faced by forensic medical and judicial practice in determining a health disorder associated with permanent disability, we studied more than 100 criminal proceedings from 2007 to the present time. Results: Ways to further improvement of the procedure for conducting expert studies on health disorders, associated with persistent loss of general ability to work as a characteristic feature of the bodily harm have been found to avoid errors in forensic medical and judicial practice. The issues of conducting forensic medical examinations to determine the degree of loss of general ability to work remain unresolved. The lack of joint research projects conducted by both medical and legal scientists leads to the polysemy and different approaches in the stating of certain concepts that are the subject of study of both medical and law sciences. Currently, the definition of the offence against health is debatable and the issues of criteria for determining such damage are not completely settled to date. Conclusions: We consider the development of the Procedure and Criteria for determining the degree (in percentage) of the permanent loss of general ability to work of victims of criminal offences, established by forensic medical experts, is crucial.


2019 ◽  
pp. 119-135
Author(s):  
Marta Jasińska

According to legal regulation of the criminal proceedings code, non-judicial bodies bear responsibility for conducting preparatory proceedings. Prosecutor as the main body conducts or supervises proceedings. In regard to scope of the regulation, proceedings are conducted by Police or a body with the same eligibility as Police. Aforementioned powers result directly from the criminal code, and also from the Minister for Justice’s ordinance of September 22nd, 2015 regarding bodies that are, along with Police, approved to conduct proceedings. The regulation also regards bodies approved to bring and support accusation to trial in frst instance courts in cases which the proceedings were conducted in, as well as the scope of cases delegable to this bodies. Aforementioned powers result also from special statutes. This deliberation is based on revised statute of Inspection of Environmental Protection which expanses the range of bodies entitled to conduct preparatory proceedings in cases directly determined in the criminal code against environment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document