scholarly journals Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan dan Corporate Governance Terhadap Konerja Keuangan Dengan Pengungkapan Sustaunability Report Sebagai Variabel Intervening

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-169
Author(s):  
Ananda Muliaturrohmah Ikhwani ◽  
Irma Paramita ◽  
Karsam Sunaryo

Financial performance can provide an overview of past performance and future prospects of a company. Many companies carry out business activities related to nature but do not disclose sustainability reports. Companies that have a large company size should disclose more information than small companies, including disclosures about the implementation of Corporate Governance and sustainability reports disclosure. With these disclosures of information, it is expected to increase public trust in the company and improve the company's financial performance. This research aims to obtain evidence that company size and Corporate Governance influence financial performance, and the role of Sustainability Report disclosure as mediating the relationship between these variables in nine state-owned enterprises and the mining sector for five years (2013-2017). The results of this study indicate that (1) company size has effects on financial performance; (2) audit committee has effects on financial performance; (3) the board of directors does not affect financial performance; (4) company size has not affect the disclosure of sustainability report; (5) the audit committee has not affect the disclosure of sustainability report; (6) the board of directors has effect the disclosure of sustainability report; and (7) Sustainability Report disclosure can’t mediate the influence between company size/Corporate Governance on financial performance.

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1451
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Sintya Puspita Dewi ◽  
I Wayan Ramantha

This study aims to obtain empirical evidence regarding the influence of the board of directors, independent commissioners, audit committee, and company size on the sustainability report with institutional ownership as a moderating variable. The number of samples used was 117, with the sample collection method using purposive sampling method, while the data collection method used in this study was documentation. The data analysis technique used is Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The results showed that the board of directors, independent commissioners, and audit committee had a positive effect on the sustainability report, while company size had no effect on the sustainability report. In addition, institutional ownership is able to moderate the influence of the board of directors, independent commissioners, and company size on the sustainability report. Meanwhile, institutional ownership was not able to moderate the effect of the audit committee on the sustainability report. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance; Sustainability Report.


Author(s):  
Jun aidi ◽  
Nurd iono ◽  
Ahmad Rifai ◽  
Icuk Rangga Bawano

This study examines the effect of good corporate governance and sustainability report on company performance. Good corporate governance is dependent on the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent commissioners, the size of the audit committee, institutional ownership, management ownership. Sustainability report is facilitated by economic, environmental and social aspect as well as disclosure index. While Company performance is generated by Return on Assets (ROA). This research was conducted on companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2014-2018. The purposive sampling technique was used. Hypothesis testing was done by linear regression analysis. The results of testing the first variable showed that institutional ownership affects ROA and has a negative relationship direction. While the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent directors, the size of the audit committee, and management ownership have no effect on ROA. However, the result of the second variable showed that the disclosure of economic aspects affects ROA and has a positive relationship direction. While disclosure of environmental and social aspects does not affect ROA.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-287
Author(s):  
Desi Pipian Pujakusum

This study aims to examine the effect of good corporate governance mechanism on the financial performance of banking companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange 2012-2016 period. The corporate governance mechanism is proxied by the size of the board of directors, the size of the board of commissioners, audit committee size, the board of director's education, and the board of commissioner’s education. The company's financial performance is proxied by return on assets (ROA). Samples were taken by using purposive sampling. The total number of samples used in this study amounted to 180 research samples. This study was tested with SPSS 20 program. Data analysis technique used in this research is simple regression analysis.  The results showed that the size of the board of directors, the size of the board of commissioners, and audit comitee size have a significant effect on return on assets. These three factors have a significant effect on return on assets, while the board of commissioners education and the board of director's education have no significant effect on return on assets.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 290
Author(s):  
Della Ayu Rizki ◽  
Eni Wuryani

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of implementing good corporate governance on financial performance in banking companies. Proxies for good corporate governance are the board of directors, the independent board of commissioners, the audit committee, external audit quality, and institutional ownership. Measurement of banking financial performance uses Return on Assets (ROA). The sample used is 26 samples of banking sector companies listed on the IDX during 2014-2018. The analysis technique uses multiple regression analysis. The results showed that the board of directors and institutional ownership have an influence on financial performance, while the independent board of commissioners, audit committee, and external audit quality have no influence on financial performance. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance;Financial Performance;Banking Sector.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.34) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Andhika Ligar Hardika ◽  
Daniel T. H. Manurung ◽  
Yati Mulyati

The importance of sustainability reporting for companies to be able to know the role of the company in disclosing social responsibility and the implementation of corporate sustainability as a manifestation of corporate governance mechanisms, company size and financial performance. This study uses a stratified random sampling method for companies that have revealed sustainability reports and those that do not disclose sustainability reports. The research method uses logistic regression, with a sample of 13 non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Based on the results obtained, it can be seen that the mechanism of corporate governance consisting of independent commissioner variables has a negative influence on sustainability reporting, institutional ownership variables have a positive influence on sustainability reporting, managerial ownership variables have a negative influence on sustainability reporting, audit committee variables have a negative effect on sustainability reporting, the variable size of the company gives a negative influence on sustainability reporting, and financial performance variables which are leverage variables have a negative influence on sustainability reporting.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 200
Author(s):  
Sri Wahjuni Latifah ◽  
Muhammad Fahminuddin Rosyid ◽  
Lilik Purwanti ◽  
Tri Wahyu Oktavendi

This study aims to analysiss and examine the effect of the financial performance and good corporate governance on sustainability report. Financial performance is measured using ROA. Good corporate governance mechanisms used are managerial ownership, independent commissioner board, board of directors and independent audit committee. The population is state-owned companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2011-2014. A purposive sampling method is used as a sampling method and 13 companies are selected as samples. A multiple linear regression analysis using SEM-PLS program is employed as a data analysis tool. The results show that the ROA, the board of directors, and audit committees affect sustainability reports; while managerial ownership and independent board do not affect sustainability reports.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Jielend Ariandhini

This study aims to determine the effect of Corporate Governance (CG) as measured by the composition of the board of commissioners, the composition of the board of directors, the composition of the audit committee and the composition of the syariah supervisory board on the profitability of sharia commercial banks as measured by Return On Assets (ROA). The Method of this research is quantitatif by using secondary data with documentation technique. The population used in this study is all sharia commercial banks, based on the financial statements of each bank. The observation period in this research is from 2011 to 2016. The sampling technique is done by purposive sampling method. There are 5 banks, namely Bank Muamalat, Bank Sharia Mandiri, Bank Negara Indonesia Sharia, Bank Rakyat Indonesia Sharia, Bank Central Asia Sharia. Data analysis technique used in this research is panel regression. The results showed that independent variables of board of commissioner and syariah supervisory board have no significant effect on financial performance measured by Return on Asset (ROA). The independent variable of the board of directors has a positive and significant impact on the financial performance measured using Return on Assets (ROA), and the audit committee independent variable has a negative and significant effect on the financial performance measured using Return on Assets (ROA).


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Robby Krisyadi ◽  
Elleen Elleen

The objective of this study is to examine and analyze the correlation of company characteristics and corporate governance towards sustainability report disclosure. The company characteristics mentioned before consist of company size, leverage level, profitability level, and liquidity level, while the corporate governance consist of the board of directors’s meeting frequency and audit committee’s meeting frequency. Companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2014 to 2018 are the objects of this research. Data that needs to be collected are financial reports, annual reports, and sustainability reports if available. Purposive sample is the sampling technique used in this study by establishing certain characteristics that are in line with the objectives of the study. There are 301 companies used as samples. The data that has been collected will then be processed with a software called SPSS Version 22 which is analyzed with the logistic regression model. The test results in this study explain that company size, profitability, and the board of directors have a positive effect on sustainability report disclosure, while leverage and the audit committee don’t have any significant effects on the sustainability report disclosure. In addition, there are also significant negative results indicated by the liquidity variable on the sustainability report disclosure. This is triggered by the company's poor financial condition, so companies with low liquidity tend to disclose more additional information such as sustainability reports so that investors will continue to invest in the company.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodhiyani Cahya Ningsih ◽  
Dian Retnaningdiah

this study was to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on Financial Performance as measured by Return on Assets (ROA) in financial companies listed on the IDX in the period of 2014-2018. This study used a Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. The independent variable of the research used GCG as proxied by the Board of Directors, Proportion of Independent Commissioners, Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, and the Audit Committee, while CSR is measured using indicators based on the 2016 Global Reporting Inititive (GRI) Standard. Financial performance as measured by Return on Assets (ROA). Sampling data using purposive sampling, and there are 11 companies that meet predetermined criteria. This study showed that the Managerial Ownership has an effect on Financial Performance (ROA). This is shown as hypothesized. The Board of Directors, the Proportion of Independent Commissioners, Institutional Ownership, the Audit Committee do not affect the Financial Performance (ROA), this is not as hypothesized. CSR has no effect on Financial Performance (ROA), this is not what was hypothesized. The Board of Directors, Proportion of Independent Commissioners, Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, Audit Committee and CSR simultaneously affect Financial Performance (ROA). These results meet the hypotheses of the study.   Keywords: Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Performance


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-28
Author(s):  
Lucia Lucia ◽  
Rosinta Ria Panggabean

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of company’s characteristic which are profitability (ROA), leverage (DER), liquidity (CR), company size (SIZE), and corporate governance proxied by board of directors and audit committee (KA) to disclosure of sustainability reports (SR). The study had 105 samples of manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange and 262 manufacturing companies listed on Malaysia Exchange in year 2013-2015. Data analysis using regression logistic method with E-views version 9. Hypothesis testing results show that the partial results of hypothesis testing variable DER, CR, and Directors do not have significant effect on internet financial reporting, but ROA and SIZE have significant influence on sustainability report disclosure (SR) of manufacturing companies listed in IDX and Bursa Malaysia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document