ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY OF LIFE IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS - USING FACT-G, SF-36 AND QLQ-C30 QUESTIONNAIRES

2011 ◽  
pp. 98-105
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thai Bao Nguyen ◽  
Dinh Tung Nguyen ◽  
Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Staging ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Quality Of Life Index

Background: The assessment and improvement of Quality of life (QoL) of breast cancer and other diseases patients have been of great concern for a long time. This research is to assessing the QoL of breast cancer patients using the popular and recommended instruments, the FACT-G, SF-36 and QLQ-C30 (including QLQ-BR23). Methods and Materials: A cross-sectional descriptive study on breast cancer patients receiving surgical, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, using FACT-G, SF-36 and QLQ-C30 to evaluate their quality of life. The assessment is mainly based on the patients’ own feelings. Results: Average age: 48.4±13.1. Most patients in the sample are from stage IIA to stage IIIB (TNM Cancer Staging, by AJCC 2010). Quality of life index using FACT-G is 60.6±5.1, using SF-36 is 46.5±11.0 in physical health and 53.1±14.8 in mental health, using QLQ-C30 is 53.1±21.0. Conclusion: The QoL assessment by using these instruments shows results mostly in average on many aspects. The screening needs to be improved for better early-detection and treatment, especially in mental care. Quality of life of breast cancer patients reasearches should be paid more attention and widely expanded.

scholarly journals Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Patients in Amhara Region, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamrat Alem ◽  
Dabere Nigatu ◽  
Amsalu Birara ◽  
Tamene Fetene ◽  
Mastewal Giza
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Amhara Region ◽  
Cross Sectional

Abstract BackgroundAlthough breast cancer has a markedly higher incidence in developed countries, 50% of the new diagnosis and 70% of deaths occur in developing countries. There are limited data available on the quality of life among breast cancer patients in Ethiopia, notably in the Amhara region. This study aimed to assess the quality of life and associated factors among patients with breast cancer in the Amhara Region, Ethiopia, 2019.MethodsInstitutional based cross-sectional study was conducted from March 25 to July 7/2019 among 256 patients with breast cancer in the Amhara region. A systematic random sampling technique was used. Data were collected by using a standardized interviewer-administered Amharic version of the European Organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30(EORTC QLQ C30) and breast cancer supplementary measure (QLQ-BR23). Data were analyzed by SPSS version 23. A binary logistic regression model was fitted to identify the associated factors. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to measure the strength of association.ResultsSixty-eight point four percent (68.4%) of breast cancer patient's QoL was poor. The mean score of quality of life was 70.6(standard deviation (SD) ±13.9; 95% CI: 69.0-72.4). All functional component scores were less than 75, from the symptom scale; diarrhea (11.6), constipation (17.5), and dyspnea (24.7) were less noticeable. Unmarried patients (AOR=2.59, 95% CI: 1.32-5.07), poor (AOR=2.39, 95%CI: 1.32-5.03), non housewife (AOR=3.25, 95% CI: 1.16-7.22), and complaints to dyspnea (AOR=3.48, 95% CI: 1.79-6.79), and insomnia (AOR=2.03, 95% CI: 1.05-3.91) were significantly associated with quality of life.ConclusionsHealth care professionals should give attention to unmarried, and non-housewife breast cancer patients, besides the treatment to improve the health of breast cancer patients.

scholarly journals Effect of Inhibited T lymphocyte Function on Depressive Symptoms in Breast Cancer Patients with Depression

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-He Zhou ◽  
Wei-Han Li ◽  
De-Long Zhang ◽  
Bai-Le Ning ◽  
Lin Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
T Lymphocytes ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
T Lymphocyte ◽  
Structural Equations ◽  
Lymphocyte Function ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional

Abstract Background: Depression has a high incidence among patients with breast cancer, but the relationship between depression and cancer-related physiological changes is not clear.Objectives: To explore the effect of T lymphocytes on breast cancer depression and the patient’s quality of life.Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. A total of 93 breast cancer patients with depression were recruited, 46 of whom underwent T lymphocyte, cortisol, BDNF, TNF-α, and IL-1β collection. We analysed the correlation between the indicators in these 46 participants and constructed two intermediary structural equations between their T lymphocytes and depression, as well as their T lymphocytes and their quality of life.Results: The results showed that CD4+ had a positive correlation with BDNF (r=0.334, P=0.023) and that BDNF had a negative correlation with HAMD-24 (r=-0.390, P=0.007). Both CD3+ and CD8+ cells were negatively correlated with cortisol (r=-0.358, P=0.015, r=-0.411, P=0.005), and cortisol was positively correlated with FACT-B (r=0.435, P=0.003). The equations including CD4+, BDNF, and HAMD-24, as well as the equations including CD3+, CD8+, cortisol, and FACT-B, were established. BDNF was the mediating variable between CD4+ and HAMD-24. Cortisol was the mediating variable between CD3+, CD8+ and FACT-B. Neither HAMD-24 nor FACT-B could form a direct path with T lymphocytes.Conclusion: T lymphocytes may be involved in the depression of breast cancer patients since a poor quality of life could inhibit T lymphocytes, and this may be the underlying physiological cause of breast cancer-related depression.

Prognostic significance of quality of life index in breast cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6135-6135
Author(s):  
D. Gupta ◽  
J. F. Grutsch ◽  
J. Granick ◽  
R. Neelam ◽  
P. G. Vashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Life Index ◽  
Quality Of Life Index

6135 Background: Quality of Life (QoL) is a multidimensional construct. There is extensive data showing that QoL tools measuring the activities of daily life provide prognostic information in cancer. However, similar information on QoL tools measuring patient satisfaction with their life is sparse. The Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index (QLI) is one such instrument. The goal of this study was to evaluate the statistical strength of association between QLI and survival in breast cancer patients undergoing care in a non-clinical trial setting. Methods: We examined a case series of 251 breast cancer patients treated at Cancer Treatment Centers of America between 04/01 and 11/04. QLI defines QoL in terms of satisfaction with the aspects of life that are important to the patient. QLI measures overall QoL and QoL in four major subscales: health and physical, social and economic, psychological and spiritual, and family. All scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating better QoL. Study patients were dichotomized into 2 groups based on median scores for all QoL subscales. Kaplan Meier method was used to calculate survival. Log-Rank test was used to study the equality of survival distributions. Results: Of 251 patients, 74 were newly diagnosed and 177 had prior treatment history. The median age was 48 years (range 25 - 74 years). 45 patients had stage I disease, 105 stage II, 38 stage III, and 32 stage IV. The table describes the median survival for all QLI subscales. Health and physical functioning subscale and QLI subtotal subscale were significantly associated with survival. Conclusions: This study shows that baseline levels of patient satisfaction with their QoL provide useful prognostic information in breast cancer. While these findings need to be evaluated further to ascertain which subscales of QoL have a role in predicting patients’ prognosis, they have important implications for patient stratification in clinical trials and may aid decision-making in clinical practice. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Low Quality of Life (QoL) in Indian Breast Cancer Patients : A Critical Analysis of Up

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjiv Srivast ◽  
Alpana Srivast ◽  
Sandeep Tiwari
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Fear Of Recurrence ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Psychological Well Being ◽  
Spiritual Well Being

Abstract BackgroundBreast cancer is the commonest of all cancers among women across the world and India being no exception to this deadly disease. There may be many symptoms due to cancer, some are complex but some are not complex. Measuring quality of life (QoL) is important to measure overall burden of disease. It is important to evaluate cancer specific QoL which is associated to all stages of this disease. Also Quality of Life is a term that adds various dimensions of quality of life such as physical, psychological, socio-economical, spiritual, cognitional & social dimensions. Balance between all the four domains (i.e. Physical, Psychological, Social and Spiritual) means good quality of life, but in India QoL in general is not good and if we talk of cancer patients its worst.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is assessment of QoL in breast cancer patients undergoing treatment through various modalities at different stages of disease.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study, a total of 150 breast cancer patients were included. Patients quality of life were assessed by Ferrel‘s Quality of Life Instrument-Breast Cancer patient version and the instrument is already validated by Ferrel BR et al (2012). These questionnaires consist of general well-being, psychological well-being, distress, fearfulness, social concerns and spiritual well-being. The data obtained gives Cronbach alpha value of 0.642 which is reliable enough for further study. The QoL in for most subjects was around 50% and is a cause of concern as this is quite low as compare to global standards. ResultsA significant relationship between type of cancer, amount of pain, and fatigue (tiredness) was found. However, none of the demographic variables (age, marital status, income) were significantly related to QoL. Education and type of treatment were found to be correlated with QoL. The physical well-being score was found to be Mean = 4.82, SD = 2.19. The Psychological well-being score was found to be Mean=4.95, SD=2.02. For social well-being score was found to be Mean=4.98, SD=1.94. The highest score was for spiritual well-being Mean = 5.32, SD = 2.46.ConclusionInfluencing quality of life (QoL) is an important issue in Breast cancer patients. Apart from effect of treatment there are other factors like socioeconomic status, psychological well-being, fear of recurrence etc., Which plays a pivotal role in patients wellbeing and if counseled at various levels like family, hospital and society can improve QoL.

scholarly journals A prospective study of quality of life in breast cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Canhua Xiao ◽  
Andrew H. Miller ◽  
Mylin A. Torres
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
A Prospective Study

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of radiation therapy on quality of life (QOL) of breast cancer patients during and until 1 year after radiation therapy treatment. Methods and materials: Thirty-nine breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery were enrolled in a prospective study before whole breast radiation therapy (50 Gy plus a 10-Gy boost). No patient received chemotherapy. Data were collected before, at week 6 of radiation therapy, and 6 weeks and 1 year after radiation therapy. The primary outcome variable was quality of life (QOL), measured by Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Version 2 (SF-36). Risk factors potentially associated with total SF-36 scores and its physical and mental health component summary scores were also examined, including age, race, marital status, smoking history, menopausal status, endocrine treatment, cancer stage, sleep abnormalities (assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), and perceived stress levels (assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale). Mixed effect modeling was used to observe QOL changes during and after radiation therapy. Results: Total SF-36 scores did not change significantly during and up to 1 year after radiation therapy compared with baseline measures. Nevertheless, increased body mass index (BMI) and increased perceived stress were predictive of reduced total SF-36 scores over time (P Z .0064, and P < .0001, respectively). In addition, increased BMI was predictive of reduced physical component summary scores of the SF-36 (P Z .0011), whereas increased perceived stress was predictive of worse mental component summary scores (P < .0001). Other proposed potential risk factors including skin toxicity from radiation therapy were not significant. Conclusions: Radiation therapy did not worsen QOL in breast cancer patients. However, preradiation therapy patient characteristics including BMI and perceived stress may be used to identify women who may experience decreased physical and mental function during and up to 1 year after radiation therapy. Copyright 2016 the Authors. Published by EJCS on behalf of Uptodate In Medicine LLC Health Sciences Publishing. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

scholarly journals Nutritional Status and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients in Karawaci General Hospital

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
ANDREE KURNIAWAN ◽  
NATA PRATAMA HARDJO LUGITO
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Subjective Global Assessment ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Sf 36

ABSTRACTCancer is related to a deterioration of nutritional status and quality of life (Qol), but the extent of these conditions in patients with breast cancer has not been studied well. Malnutrition is prevalent among cancer patients and maybe correlated with altered quality of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of QoL and nutritional status after breast cancer diagnosed. Nutritional status was evaluated with Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment and QoL using Short form 36 (SF-36) and also with the specific module for breast cancer patients. A consecutive sampleof twenty two patients diagnosed with breast cancer was evaluated. The associations of QoL with stadium and nutrition status were evaluated using T-test analysis. The mean of body mass index was 21.3 kg/m2. Fifty percent patient have menopause. Most patients were stage II (77.3%), the others stage III (18.2%) and stage I (4.5%). Sixty eight point two percent had risk of malnutrition. The stadium of tumor was significantly related to physical functioning (p < 0.000), physical limitation (p < 0.024), emotional limitation (p < 0.013), well-being (p < 0.020), health changes (p < 0.010). Thestatus of nutrition was significantly related to physical functioning (p < 0.001), loss of energy (p < 0.010) and general health (p <0.005). For Conclusion, the status of nutrition breast cancer patients were related to QoL especially physical functioning, loss of energy and general health after they were diagnosed.ABSTRAKKanker sangat terkait dengan perburukan status nutrisi dan kualitas hidup. Namun demikian, belum banyak studi yang yang melaporkan masalah nutrisi dan kulitas hidup pada kanker payudara. Malnutrisi sering ditemukan pada kanker dan mungkin terkait dengan perubahan kulaitas hidup. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengevaluasi hubungan antara kualitas hidup dengan status nutrisi setelah kanker payudara terdiagnosis. Evaluasi status nutrisi dilakukan dengan Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment dan kualitas hidup dengan Short form 36 (SF-36) sertakarakteristik pada kanker payudara. Sampel diambil dengan teknik konsekutif terhadap 22 pasien yang terdiagnosis kanker payudara. Hubungan kualitas hidup dengan stadium kanker dan status nutrisi dinilai menggunakan analisis T-test. Indeks massa tubuh rata-rata adalah 21,3 kg/m2. Lima puluh pasien telah menopause. Terbanyak adalah stadium 2 (77,3%), stadium 3 (18,2%), dan stadium 1 (4,5%). Enam puluh dua koma dua persen berisiko malnutrisi. Stadium tumor secara bermakna berhubungan dengan fungsi fisik (p <0,000), keterbatasan fisik (p<0,024), keterbatasan emosi(p<0,013), rasa nyaman (p<0,020), dan perubahan kesehatan (p<0,000). Status nutrisi berhubungan secara bermakna dengan fungsi fisik (p<0,001), kehilangan energi (p<0,010), dan kesehatan secara umum (p<0,005). Simpulan, status nutrisi pasien kanker payudara berhubungan dengan kualitas hidup, terutama fungsi fisik, kehilangan energi, status kesehatan umum setelah mereka terdiagnosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document