Developing and implementing enterprise risk and resilience management (ERRM) in utilities. Guide

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Risk And Resilience ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
Resilience Management

scholarly journals Towards Integrated Flood Risk and Resilience Management

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangtao Fu ◽  
Fanlin Meng ◽  
Mónica Rivas Casado ◽  
Roy S. Kalawsky
Keyword(s):  
Flood Risk ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Flood Management ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Risk And Resilience ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Adverse Impacts ◽  
Hazard And Risk ◽  
Future Research Directions ◽  
Resilience Management

Flood resilience is an emerging concept for tackling extreme weathers and minimizing the associated adverse impacts. There is a significant knowledge gap in the study of resilience concepts, assessment frameworks and measures, and management strategies. This editorial introduces the latest advances in flood risk and resilience management, which are published in 11 papers in the Special Issue. A synthesis of these papers is provided in the following themes: hazard and risk analysis, flood behaviour analysis, assessment frameworks and metrics, and intervention strategies. The contributions are discussed in the broader context of the field of flood risk and resilience management and future research directions are identified for sustainable flood management.

scholarly journals Review and Evaluation of the J100‐10 Risk and Resilience Management Standard for Water and Wastewater Systems

Risk Analysis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 608-623
Author(s):  
Thomas Ying‐Jeh Chen ◽  
Valerie Nicole Washington ◽  
Terje Aven ◽  
Seth David Guikema
Keyword(s):  
Risk And Resilience ◽  
Management Standard ◽  
Wastewater Systems ◽  
Resilience Management ◽  
Water And Wastewater

Prioritization of hazards for risk and resilience management through elicitation of expert judgement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
ioanna ioannou ◽  
Jaime Cadena Gomez ◽  
Willy Aspinall ◽  
David Lange ◽  
Daniel Honfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Paired Comparison ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Expert Elicitation ◽  
Risk And Resilience ◽  
Mathematical Technique ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Resilience Management ◽  
Hazard Scenario

Abstract Risk assessment in communities or regions typically relies on the determination of hazard scenarios and an evaluation of their impact on local systems and structures. One of the challenges of risk assessment for infrastructure operators is how to identify the most critical scenarios that are likely to represent unacceptable risks to such assets in a given time frame. This study develops a novel approach for prioritizing hazards for the risk assessment of infrastructure. Central to the proposed methodology is an expert elicitation technique termed paired comparison which is based on a formal mathematical technique for quantifying the range and variance in the judgements of a group of stakeholders. The methodology is applied here to identify and rank natural and operational hazard scenarios that could cause serious disruption or have disastrous effects to the infrastructure in the transnational Øresund region over a period of five years. The application highlighted substantial divergences of views among the stakeholders on identifying a single ‘most critical’ natural or operational hazard scenario. Despite these differences, it was possible to flag up certain cases as critical among the natural hazard scenarios, and others among the operational hazards.

Enterprise Risk and Resilience of Electric-Vehicle Charging Infrastructure and the Future Mobile Power Grid

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Andrews ◽  
Thomas L. Polmateer ◽  
John P. Wheeler ◽  
David L. Slutzky ◽  
James H. Lambert
Keyword(s):  
Electric Vehicle ◽  
Power Grid ◽  
Risk And Resilience ◽  
Charging Infrastructure ◽  
Electric Vehicle Charging ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
The Future ◽  
Vehicle Charging
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document