scholarly journals Review and Evaluation of the J100‐10 Risk and Resilience Management Standard for Water and Wastewater Systems

Risk Analysis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 608-623
Author(s):  
Thomas Ying‐Jeh Chen ◽  
Valerie Nicole Washington ◽  
Terje Aven ◽  
Seth David Guikema
Keyword(s):  
Risk And Resilience ◽  
Management Standard ◽  
Wastewater Systems ◽  
Resilience Management ◽  
Water And Wastewater

scholarly journals Protecting the Water Supply

2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (01) ◽  
pp. 34-36
Author(s):  
Kevin M. Morley ◽  
Jerry P. Brashear
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Drinking Water ◽  
National Standard ◽  
Risk And Resilience ◽  
Water Sector ◽  
Wastewater Systems ◽  
Water And Wastewater ◽  
Reduce Risk ◽  
Managing Risk ◽  
Selection Of

This article highlights various features of risk and resilience standard developed by the ASME-ITI and American Water Works Association. The American Water Works Association and ASME Innovative Technologies Institute have jointly developed an American National Standard to enhance the security and resilience of drinking water and wastewater systems. The ASME-ITI, under the Department of Homeland Security’s sponsorship, initiated discussions with the water sector to consider the development of sector-level guidance based on RAMCAP Plus. The RAMCAP Plus process is composed of seven interrelated analytic steps, which provides a foundation for data collection and interpretation, analysis, and decision making valuable for understanding and managing risk and resilience. The process is designed to guide the selection of options that reduce risk and increase resilience, including informing funding decisions. The joint standard fulfils the need identified in the water sector-specific plan. It facilitates the reduction of risk and the enhancement of resilience at water and wastewater systems across America.

Monitoring and validation of decentralised water and wastewater systems for increased uptake

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (11) ◽  
pp. 2576-2581 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Sharma ◽  
S. Cook ◽  
M. N. Chong
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Energy Demand ◽  
Climate Change Impacts ◽  
Extended Period ◽  
Design Guidelines ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Actual Performance ◽  
Decentralised Systems ◽  
Wastewater Systems ◽  
Water And Wastewater

Decentralised water and wastewater systems are being implemented to meet growing demand for municipal services either in combination with centralised systems or as standalone systems. In Australia, there has been increased investment in decentralised water and wastewater systems in response to the capacity constraints of existing centralised systems, an extended period of below average rainfall, uncertainly in traditional water sources due to potential climate change impacts, and the need to reduce the environmental impact of urban development. The implementation of decentralised water systems as a mainstream practice at different development scales is impeded by the knowledge gaps on their actual performance in a range of development types and settings. As the wide-spread uptake of these approaches in modern cities is relatively new compared to centralised approaches, there is limited information available on their planning, design, implementation, reliability and robustness. This paper presents a number of case studies where monitoring studies are under way to validate the performance of decentralised water and wastewater systems. The results from these case studies show the yield and reliability of these decentralised systems, as well as the associated energy demand and ecological footprint. The outputs from these case studies, and other monitoring studies, are important in improving decentralised system design guidelines and developing industry wide management norms for the operation and maintenance of decentralised systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document