Security and resilience. Urban resilience. Framework and principles

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Urban Resilience ◽  
Resilience Framework

Keeping Feet Dry: Rotterdam’s Experience in Flood Risk and Resilience Building

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Audrey O. Esteban ◽  
Jurian Edelenbos ◽  
Naomi van Stapele
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Flood Risk ◽  
Risk And Resilience ◽  
Urban Resilience ◽  
Key Stakeholders ◽  
Flooding Disaster ◽  
Resilience Framework ◽  
The City ◽  
Collective Engagement ◽  
Depth Interviews

Rotterdam City in the South of Holland is one of the most vibrant cities you will find in the Netherlands. The city has gone through a transformation from the time it was bombed in the 1940s up to the time that a part of the city was flooded in 1953. Through extensive rebuilding and the Delta Plan project, the city has been well protected against any flooding disaster that may come. However, how resilient really is Rotterdam? Through in-depth interviews of key stakeholders in the City of Rotterdam, the study investigates the collective engagement in the city and how this has helped shape Rotterdam’s position in urban resilience. The study used the Collective Engagement Urban Resilience Framework as a framework to understand how disaster prone cities transform itself to become disaster resilient.

Responding to the Economic Impacts of Coronavirus: A Proposed Oregon Economic Recovery and Resilience Framework

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Parker ◽  
Josh Bruce ◽  
Tyler Bump ◽  
Matt Craigie ◽  
John Tapogna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Impacts ◽  
Economic Recovery ◽  
Resilience Framework

Influencing factors and their influencing mechanisms on urban resilience in China

2021 ◽  
pp. 103210
Author(s):  
Dezhi Li ◽  
Guanying Huang ◽  
Dezhi Li ◽  
Xiongwei Zhu ◽  
Jin Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Influencing Factors ◽  
Urban Resilience

scholarly journals Landscape Design toward Urban Resilience: Bridging Science and Physical Design Coupling Sociohydrological Modeling and Design Process

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 4666
Author(s):  
Yoonshin Kwak ◽  
Brian Deal ◽  
Grant Mosey
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Landscape Design ◽  
Urban Systems ◽  
Urban Resilience ◽  
Planning Support Systems ◽  
Creative Solutions ◽  
Resilient Communities ◽  
Study Support ◽  
Key Variables ◽  
Resilient Design

Given that evolving urban systems require ever more sophisticated and creative solutions to deal with uncertainty, designing for resilience in contemporary landscape architecture represents a cross-disciplinary endeavor. While there is a breadth of research on landscape resilience within the academy, the findings of this research are seldom making their way into physical practice. There are existent gaps between the objective, scientific method of scientists and the more intuitive qualitative language of designers and practitioners. The purpose of this paper is to help bridge these gaps and ultimately support an endemic process for more resilient landscape design creation. This paper proposes a framework that integrates analytic research (i.e., modeling and examination) and design creation (i.e., place-making) using processes that incorporate feedback to help adaptively achieve resilient design solutions. Concepts of Geodesign and Planning Support Systems (PSSs) are adapted as part of the framework to emphasize the importance of modeling, assessment, and quantification as part of processes for generating information useful to designers. This paper tests the suggested framework by conducting a pilot study using a coupled sociohydrological model. The relationships between runoff and associated design factors are examined. Questions on how analytic outcomes can be translated into information for landscape design are addressed along with some ideas on how key variables in the model can be translated into useful design information. The framework and pilot study support the notion that the creation of resilient communities would be greatly enhanced by having a navigable bridge between science and practice.

scholarly journals Revealing the Challenges of Smart Rainwater Harvesting for Integrated and Digital Resilience of Urban Water Infrastructure

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 1902
Author(s):  
Martin Oberascher ◽  
Aun Dastgir ◽  
Jiada Li ◽  
Sina Hesarkazzazi ◽  
Mohsen Hajibabaei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Rainwater Harvesting ◽  
Data Communication ◽  
Integrated System ◽  
Coupled Systems ◽  
Urban Resilience ◽  
System Failures ◽  
Household Level ◽  
Performance Improvements ◽  
Smart Water

Smart rainwater harvesting (RWH) systems can automatically release stormwater prior to rainfall events to increase detention capacity on a household level. However, impacts and benefits of a widespread implementation of these systems are often unknown. This works aims to investigate the effect of a large-scale implementation of smart RWH systems on urban resilience by hypothetically retrofitting an Alpine municipality with smart rain barrels. Smart RWH systems represent dynamic systems, and therefore, the interaction between the coupled systems RWH units, an urban drainage network (UDN) and digital infrastructure is critical for evaluating resilience against system failures. In particular, digital parameters (e.g., accuracy of weather forecasts, or reliability of data communication) can differ from an ideal performance. Therefore, different digital parameters are varied to determine the range of uncertainties associated with smart RWH systems. As the results demonstrate, smart RWH systems can further increase integrated system resilience but require a coordinated integration into the overall system. Additionally, sufficient consideration of digital uncertainties is of great importance for smart water systems, as uncertainties can reduce/eliminate gained performance improvements. Moreover, a long-term simulation should be applied to investigate resilience with digital applications to reduce dependence on boundary conditions and rainfall patterns.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document