General criteria for laboratory accreditation bodies

1989 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Accreditation

Laboratory Accreditation: Streamlining the System

The Synergist ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Fred Grunder ◽  
Joni Lucas
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Accreditation

Dental laboratory accreditation

1968 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 617-619
Author(s):  
Glenn E. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Accreditation

Clinical Laboratory Accreditation in India

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Handoo ◽  
Swaroop Krishan Sood
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Laboratory Accreditation

Akkreditierung im Prüfwesen / Laboratory accreditation

1992 ◽  
Vol 34 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 246-249
Author(s):  
Jürgen Bohse ◽  
Hans-Ulrich Mittmann
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Accreditation

Achieving Quality Reproducible Results and Maintaining Compliance in Molecular Diagnostic Testing of Human Papillomavirus

2003 ◽  
Vol 127 (8) ◽  
pp. 978-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline M. Seabrook ◽  
Roger A. Hubbard
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Method Validation ◽  
Proficiency Testing ◽  
Laboratory Testing ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Laboratory Accreditation ◽  
Medical Laboratory ◽  
Molecular Diagnostic ◽  
High Complexity

Abstract Laboratories contemplating either the addition of new molecular tests or modifying methods approved by the Food and Drug Administration for human papillomavirus testing should be aware of a variety of procedural, performance, and regulatory issues surrounding such activity. Diagnostic medical laboratory testing in the United States is regulated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, an agency formerly known as the Health Care Finance Administration. The regulatory vehicle of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is manifested in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). The CLIA program has put into place specific regulations for laboratory quality control, which includes specific recommendations for method validation. Regulations that must be followed regarding personnel, quality control, quality assurance, method validation, and proficiency testing depend on the complexity category of the individual test. All molecular diagnostic tests, including those for human papillomavirus, are considered high complexity. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services retains the authority to allow private, national accreditation organizations to “deem” that a laboratory is compliant with CLIA '88 requirements. Accreditation organizations, such as the Joint Commission for Accreditation of Hospitals, the Commission on Office Laboratory Accreditation, and the College of American Pathologists (CAP), as well as several state medical laboratory–accrediting agencies, possess the authority to deem laboratories as “CLIA-approved.” The CAP, through its Laboratory Accreditation Program, has promoted standards for laboratory performance and method validation. In general, guidelines set forth in the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program checklists specify that all clinical laboratory testing must essentially meet those requirements defined for high-complexity testing under CLIA '88, including test validation standards, reportable/reference ranges, performance criteria, and proficiency testing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document