scholarly journals Correction: Zhu, S., et al. A New Digital Lake Bathymetry Model Using the Step-Wise Water Recession Method to Generate 3D Lake Bathymetric Maps Based on DEMs. Water 2019, 11, 1151

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2419
Author(s):  
Siyu Zhu ◽  
Baojian Liu ◽  
Wei Wan ◽  
Hongjie Xie ◽  
Yu Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Science ◽  
Civil Engineering ◽  
University Of Oklahoma ◽  
Email Address

In the published article [1], the authors realized some errors in the affiliation and email address of Yang Hong, and thus wish to make the following revisions: Add the Affiliation 5 “School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA” for Yang Hong Change the email address of Yang Hong to yanghong@ou [...]

scholarly journals Correction: Li, Z., et al. Study on the Applicability of the Hargreaves Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation Method in CREST-Distributed Hydrological Model (Version 3.0) Applications. Water 2018, 10, 1882

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2099
Author(s):  
Zhansheng Li ◽  
Yuan Yang ◽  
Guangyuan Kan ◽  
Yang Hong
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Science ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Civil Engineering ◽  
Potential Evapotranspiration ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Distributed Hydrological Model ◽  
Model Version ◽  
University Of Oklahoma ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Evapotranspiration Estimation

In the published article [1], the authors realized some errors in the affiliation of Yang Hong and thus wish to make the revisions as below: Add the missed Affiliation 3 “School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA” for Yang Hong; Correct the email address of Yang Hong into yanghong@ou [...]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 927 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Similarity Score ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review : Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? ∘ The review was done by considering five (5) aspects : 1) Relevance with topics 2) Novelty and originality 3) Clarity 4) Systematic 5) Analysis techniques and deduction ∘ One reviewer gave points on each aspect between 1-4. Based on total points from those four aspects : 1) Definitely Accept : 16-20 2) Accept : 11-15 3) Possibly Accept : 7-10 4) Rejected : 5-6 ∘ There was an opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions. • Conference submission management system: The paper is uploaded via EDAS (https://edas.info/) • Number of submissions received : 70 papers • Number of submissions sent for review : 60 papers • Number of submissions accepted : 48 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100) : 68.57 • Average number of reviews per paper : 2 • Total number of reviewers involved : 36 • Any additional info on review process (eg Plagiarism check system) : ∘ The similarity score was checked by the editors to find the plagiarism using https://www.turnitin.com/. ∘ The standard similarity score to be accepted is less than 15%. • Contact person for queries (Full name, affiliation, institutional email address) : Name : Ayodya Pradhipta Tenggara Affiliation : Universitas Gadjah Mada Email address : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 877 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Reviewers of ICOREMT-2021 considered the following vital points in the assessment process: A- Technical Criteria (such as scientific merits and adequacy of discussion) B- Quality Criteria (such as the scientific interest of the results and the ratio of length and importance of the idea) C- Presentation Criteria (quality of figures/tables and conclusions) One opportunity was given to the authors to address reviewers’ comments and corrections. • Conference submission management system: Direct submission via official email address. • Number of submissions received: 272 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 250 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 56 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 20.59% • The average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 203 reviewers • Any additional info on the review process (i.e. plagiarism check system): All papers were checked using Turnitin software; papers with a more than 20% similarity percentage were rejected without review. The reviewers checked the quality of the submitted papers, including the contribution to the knowledge, the importance of the idea, adequacy of discussion, quality of figures and tables, and the conclusions. After the reviewing process, one opportunity was given to the authors to address reviewers’ comments and corrections. • Contact person for queries: Dr Khalid Hashim, Liverpool John Moores University, UK Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 913 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Similarity Index ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Double Blind Method ◽  
Institution Selection

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: The peer review process was conducted with double-blind method by 2 reviewers per article. • Conference submission management system: Email address used for manuscript management system is [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 180 • Number of submissions sent for review: 125 • Number of submissions accepted: 111 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 61.67% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 rounds of review process • Total number of reviewers involved: 12 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: In detail, the submitted papers were checked for their plagiarism similarity index with Turn it in software. Any manuscript with similarity index above 25% will be returned to the author for revision. The peer-review process was conducted by involving internal reviewers from University of Mataram who has scopus H-index ≥ 3. In addition, external reviewers were also involved from other universities and institution. Selection of the reviewers was conducted based on the suitability of the reviewer expertise and the subtopic of the paper. The first decision whether the paper is rejected or required for revision is sent in approximately 4 days. The comments from the reviewer are concluded by the editor in chief to reject or accept the paper. • Contact person for queries: Eka Sunarwidhi Prasedya, Ph.D. University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia [email protected]

scholarly journals The evolution of river management law and its impact on uses by local residents: The case of the lower reaches of the Inukami river, Shiga Prefecture, Japan

2006 ◽  
Vol 73 (436-441) ◽  
pp. 296-300
Author(s):  
Kazuyuki Sasaki ◽  
Koichi Nakama
Keyword(s):  
Graduate School ◽  
Environmental Planning ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Civil Engineering ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Research Association ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Behavior Observation ◽  
Local Residents ◽  
Institute Of Technology

Kazuyuki Sasaki , a graduate student in the Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan, holds a Masters degree in Environment Science, University of Shiga Prefecture. He took a Human Relations course in the Department of Life Style Studies, School of Human Cultures, and worked in the Division of Environmental Planning, Graduate School of Environmental Science, of the same university. He is affiliated with the Man-Environment Research Association (Japan), Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, and the Japanese Society of Ecological Psychology. His publications include Analysis of River Space Using Behavior Observation (Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting ofEnvironmental Systems Research, 29, pp. 117-122), and he is co-author with Hiromichi Hosoma and Ryujirou Kondo of The Development of Biological Model of People's Behavior in River Space, Selected Papers of Environmental Systems Research, 31, pp. 405-415. Koichi Nakama is Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu Instititue of technology, Fukuoka, Japan.

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 889 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Conference Proceeding ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Review ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind. The Conference Proceeding uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. The manuscripts were handled by three Editors (details as under) and the reviewers were selected based on area of expertise. The email address used for the management system is [email protected] Person in charge/details of Manuscripts handled by editors: I. Submissions handled by Dr Sandeep Singh - 123 II. Submissions handled by Dr Jasgurpreet Singh - 122 III. Submissions handled by Dr Raman Kumar - 100 • Conference submission management system: Via Easy Chair and Conference Official email address. • Number of submissions received: 345 • Number of submissions sent for review: 176 • Number of submissions accepted: 85 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): [(85/345)*100] = 24.6 • Average number of reviews per paper: 02 • Total number of reviewers involved: 44 • Any additional info on review process: NA • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Sandeep Singh Affiliation: Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali Email : [email protected]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document