scholarly journals Evaluation of Various Probability Distributions for Deriving Design Flood Featuring Right-Tail Events in Pakistan

Water ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rizwan ◽  
Shenglian Guo ◽  
Feng Xiong ◽  
Jiabo Yin
Keyword(s):  
Water Resource Management ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Structure Design ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Data Series ◽  
Design Flood ◽  
Goodness Of Fit Test

Design flood estimation is very important for hydraulic structure design, reservoir operation, and water resources management. During the last few decades, severe flash floods have caused substantial human, agricultural, and economic damages in Pakistan during the Monsoon seasons. However, despite phenomenal losses, the flood characteristics are rarely investigated. In this paper, flood frequency analysis (FFA) on four major rivers over Pakistan is performed to probe probability distributions (PDs)at the right-tail flood events. For this purpose, (i) we employed ten different probability distributions associating with an L-moments method for constructing FFA models across Pakistan; (ii) we evaluated the best-fit distribution by using goodness-of-fit test and statistical criteria; and finally; (iii) we devised a Monte Carlo simulation to systematically evaluate the robustness of a selected distribution’s fitting performance by using a synthetic data series of different sizes. Our results indicated that generalized Pareto and Weibull emerged as the most viable options for quantifying hydrological quantiles for most of the river basins in Pakistan. Our main findings would provide rich information as references for flood risk assessment and water resource management in Pakistan.

scholarly journals The Effect of Involving Exceptional Outlier Data on Design Flood Magnitude

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 698-706
Author(s):  
Bagher Heidarpour ◽  
Bahram Saghafian ◽  
Saeed Golian
Keyword(s):  
Return Period ◽  
Rare Events ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
The Other ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Data Series ◽  
Design Flood ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Outlier Data

The term "outlier" is generally used to refer to single data points that appear to depart significantly from the trend of the other data. Outliers are classified into three types: incorrect observations, rare events resulting from essentially the same phenomena as the other maxima, and rare events resulting from a different phenomenon. Flood frequency analysis was first performed on complete data series (including the outlier) and then on the series with the outlier removed. Results revealed that omission of the outlier data didn’t affect the probability distribution function (Log-Pearson type III), but the design discharge reduced by 60 percent in 10000 year return period from 3320 (m3/s) to 1340 (m3/s). Furthermore, the method proposed by the U.S. Water Resources Council (WRC), and the HEC-SSP software were applied in order to compose outlier data with other systematic data and to modify the parameters of the statistical distribution. Using WRC method, the estimated 10000-year flood was equaled to 1907 (m3/s) by designating the outlier as the 200-year return period and revising the parameters of Log-Pearson type III distribution; that is about 43 percent decrease over the scenario involving the outlier.

scholarly journals Bivariate Flood Frequency Analysis Using Copulas

Proceedings ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikoletta Stamatatou ◽  
Lampros Vasiliades ◽  
Athanasios Loukas
Keyword(s):  
Return Period ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Peak Discharge ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Hydraulic Structures ◽  
Return Periods ◽  
Goodness Of Fit Test ◽  
Pseudo Likelihood Estimation

Flood frequency estimation for the design of hydraulic structures is usually performed as a univariate analysis of flood event magnitudes. However, recent studies show that for accurate return period estimation of the flood events, the dependence and the correlation pattern among flood attribute characteristics, such as peak discharge, volume and duration should be taken into account in a multivariate framework. The primary goal of this study is to compare univariate and joint bivariate return periods of floods that all rely on different probability concepts in Yermasoyia watershed, Cyprus. Pairs of peak discharge with corresponding flood volumes are estimated and compared using annual maximum series (AMS) and peaks over threshold (POT) approaches. The Lyne-Hollick recursive digital filter is applied to separate baseflow from quick flow and to subsequently estimate flood volumes from the quick flow timeseries. Marginal distributions of flood peaks and volumes are examined and used for the estimation of typical design periods. The dependence between peak discharges and volumes is then assessed by an exploratory data analysis using K-plots and Chi-plots, and the consistency of their relationship is quantified by Kendall’s correlation coefficient. Copulas from Archimedean, Elliptical and Extreme Value families are fitted using a pseudo-likelihood estimation method, verified using both graphical approaches and a goodness-of-fit test based on the Cramér-von Mises statistic and evaluated according to the corrected Akaike Information Criterion. The selected copula functions and the corresponding joint return periods are calculated and the results are compared with the marginal univariate estimations of each variable. Results indicate the importance of the bivariate analysis in the estimation of design return period of the hydraulic structures.

scholarly journals At Site Flood Frequency Analysis of Baitarani River at Champua Watershed, Odisha

2019 ◽  
pp. 54-64
Author(s):  
Rebati Sinam
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Return Period ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Gumbel Distribution ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Floodplain Management ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Anderson Darling

For any development of hydraulic structures and dam modelling, flood frequency analysis is an effective tool to determine the appropriate measures and strategy. Flood frequency analysis has been conventionally used in hydraulic engineering and floodplain management. The present study is an attempt to estimate the expected flood using two probability distributions: Gumbel distribution and Log Pearson III distribution at Champua watershed, Upper Baitarani River Basin, Odisha. The analysis is based on annual maximum flood time series from 1991 to 2018 (28 years) obtained from Water Resources Information System at the Champua gauging station. Three Goodness of fit methods namely Kolmogorov Smirnov, Anderson Darling and Chi Squared tests are used to choose the better model. From the analysis, expected flood for return period 2, 10, 25, 50, 100 and 1000 years are calculated. Gumbel give an expected flood 521.72 cumecs while Log Pearson III give an expected flood of 493.17 cumecs for 2 years return period. It is observed that Gumbel estimated a higher values for all the said return period except for 1000 years where Log Pearson III predicted a much higher values. Goodness of test show inconsistent results. While Chi-squared test indicate Gumbel Method as the better model, the other two tests show that Log Pearson III is the better fitting model for the given dataset. Therefore, Log Pearson III is chosen as the best model. However, the results from both the distributions can be referred for storm management.

Analysis of Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in the Damanganga Basin: Western India

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Vitthal Anwat ◽  
Pramodkumar Hire ◽  
Uttam Pawar ◽  
Rajendra Gunjal
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Western India ◽  
Type I ◽  
Return Periods ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Kolmogorov Smirnov ◽  
Anderson Darling

Flood Frequency Analysis (FFA) method was introduced by Fuller in 1914 to understand the magnitude and frequency of floods. The present study is carried out using the two most widely accepted probability distributions for FFA in the world namely, Gumbel Extreme Value type I (GEVI) and Log Pearson type III (LP-III). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) and Anderson-Darling (AD) methods were used to select the most suitable probability distribution at sites in the Damanganga Basin. Moreover, discharges were estimated for various return periods using GEVI and LP-III. The recurrence interval of the largest peak flood on record (Qmax) is 107 years (at Nanipalsan) and 146 years (at Ozarkhed) as per LP-III. Flood Frequency Curves (FFC) specifies that LP-III is the best-fitted probability distribution for FFA of the Damanganga Basin. Therefore, estimated discharges and return periods by LP-III probability distribution are more reliable and can be used for designing hydraulic structures.

The Convergence of IoT, Machine Learning, and Big Data for Advancing Flood Analytics Knowledge  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vidya Samadi ◽  
Rakshit Pally
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Big Data ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Situational Awareness ◽  
Critical Infrastructure ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Data Gathering ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Crowd Intelligence

<p>Floods are among the most destructive natural hazard that affect millions of people across the world leading to severe loss of life and damage to property, critical infrastructure, and agriculture. Internet of Things (IoTs), machine learning (ML), and Big Data are exceptionally valuable tools for collecting the catastrophic readiness and countless actionable data. The aim of this presentation is to introduce Flood Analytics Information System (FAIS) as a data gathering and analytics system.  FAIS application is smartly designed to integrate crowd intelligence, ML, and natural language processing of tweets to provide warning with the aim to improve flood situational awareness and risk assessment. FAIS has been Beta tested during major hurricane events in US where successive storms made extensive damage and disruption. The prototype successfully identifies a dynamic set of at-risk locations/communities using the USGS river gauge height readings and geotagged tweets intersected with watershed boundary. The list of prioritized locations can be updated, as the river monitoring system and condition change over time (typically every 15 minutes).  The prototype also performs flood frequency analysis (FFA) using various probability distributions with the associated uncertainty estimation to assist engineers in designing safe structures. This presentation will discuss about the FAIS functionalities and real-time implementation of the prototype across south and southeast USA. This research is funded by the US National Science Foundation (NSF).</p>

scholarly journals Hydrological model calibration for derived flood frequency analysis using stochastic rainfall and probability distributions of peak flows

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 353-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Haberlandt ◽  
I. Radtke
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Peak Flows ◽  
Hourly Rainfall

Abstract. Derived flood frequency analysis allows the estimation of design floods with hydrological modeling for poorly observed basins considering change and taking into account flood protection measures. There are several possible choices regarding precipitation input, discharge output and consequently the calibration of the model. The objective of this study is to compare different calibration strategies for a hydrological model considering various types of rainfall input and runoff output data sets and to propose the most suitable approach. Event based and continuous, observed hourly rainfall data as well as disaggregated daily rainfall and stochastically generated hourly rainfall data are used as input for the model. As output, short hourly and longer daily continuous flow time series as well as probability distributions of annual maximum peak flow series are employed. The performance of the strategies is evaluated using the obtained different model parameter sets for continuous simulation of discharge in an independent validation period and by comparing the model derived flood frequency distributions with the observed one. The investigations are carried out for three mesoscale catchments in northern Germany with the hydrological model HEC-HMS (Hydrologic Engineering Center's Hydrologic Modeling System). The results show that (I) the same type of precipitation input data should be used for calibration and application of the hydrological model, (II) a model calibrated using a small sample of extreme values works quite well for the simulation of continuous time series with moderate length but not vice versa, and (III) the best performance with small uncertainty is obtained when stochastic precipitation data and the observed probability distribution of peak flows are used for model calibration. This outcome suggests to calibrate a hydrological model directly on probability distributions of observed peak flows using stochastic rainfall as input if its purpose is the application for derived flood frequency analysis.

scholarly journals Probability distributions for explaining hydrological losses in South Australian catchments

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 4597-4626
Author(s):  
S. H. P. W. Gamage ◽  
G. A. Hewa ◽  
S. Beecham
Keyword(s):  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Joint Probability ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Design Flood ◽  
Wide Variability ◽  
Multiple Variables ◽  
Two Parameter ◽  
Non Parametric

Abstract. The wide variability of hydrological losses in catchments is due to multiple variables that affect the rainfall-runoff process. Accurate estimation of hydrological losses is required for making vital decisions in design applications that are based on design rainfall models and rainfall-runoff models. Using representative single values of losses, despite their wide variability, is common practice, especially in Australian studies. This practice leads to issues such as over or under estimation of design floods. Probability distributions can be used as a better representation of losses. In particular, using joint probability approaches (JPA), probability distributions can be incorporated into hydrological loss parameters in design models. However, lack of understanding of loss distributions limits the benefit of using JPA. The aim of this paper is to identify a probability distribution function that can successfully describe hydrological losses in South Australian (SA) catchments. This paper describes suitable parametric and non-parametric distributions that can successfully describe observed loss data. The goodness-of-fit of the fitted distributions and quantification of the errors associated with quantile estimation are also discussed a two-parameter Gamma distribution was identified as one that successfully described initial loss (IL) data of the selected catchments. Also, a non-parametric standardised distribution of losses that describes both IL and continuing loss (CL) data were identified. The results obtained for the non-parametric methods were compared with similar studies carried out in other parts of Australia and a remarkable degree of consistency was observed. The results will be helpful in improving design flood applications.

Comparison of Annual Maximum and Peaks Over Threshold Methods with Automated Threshold Selection in Flood Frequency Analysis: A Case Study for Australia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Pan ◽  
Ataur Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Distribution Functions ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Annual Maximum ◽  
Threshold Selection ◽  
Peaks Over Threshold ◽  
Design Flood ◽  
Threshold Detection ◽  
Using Data

Abstract Flood frequency analysis (FFA) enables fitting of distribution functions to observed flow data for estimation of flood quantiles. Two main approaches, Annual Maximum (AM) and peaks-over-threshold (POT) are adopted for FFA. POT approach is under-employed due to its complexity and uncertainty associated with the threshold selection and independence criteria for selecting peak flows. This study evaluates the POT and AM approaches using data from 188 gauged stations in south-east Australia. POT approach adopted in this study applies a different average numbers of events per year fitted with Generalised Pareto (GP) distribution with an automated threshold detection method. The POT model extends its parametric approach to Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE) and Point Moment Weighted Unbiased (PMWU) method. Generalised Extreme Value (GEV) distribution using L-moment estimator is used for AM approach. It has been found that there is a large difference in design flood estimates between the AM and POT approaches for smaller average recurrence intervals (ARI), with a median difference of 25% for 1.01 year ARI and 5% for 50 and 100 years ARIs.

scholarly journals Some best‐fit probability distributions for at‐site flood frequency analysis of the Ume River

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samara Kousar ◽  
Abrar Raza Khan ◽  
Mahmood Ul Hassan ◽  
Zahra Noreen ◽  
Sajjad Haider Bhatti
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Best Fit
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document