scholarly journals At Site Flood Frequency Analysis of Baitarani River at Champua Watershed, Odisha

2019 ◽  
pp. 54-64
Author(s):  
Rebati Sinam
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Return Period ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Gumbel Distribution ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Floodplain Management ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Anderson Darling

For any development of hydraulic structures and dam modelling, flood frequency analysis is an effective tool to determine the appropriate measures and strategy. Flood frequency analysis has been conventionally used in hydraulic engineering and floodplain management. The present study is an attempt to estimate the expected flood using two probability distributions: Gumbel distribution and Log Pearson III distribution at Champua watershed, Upper Baitarani River Basin, Odisha. The analysis is based on annual maximum flood time series from 1991 to 2018 (28 years) obtained from Water Resources Information System at the Champua gauging station. Three Goodness of fit methods namely Kolmogorov Smirnov, Anderson Darling and Chi Squared tests are used to choose the better model. From the analysis, expected flood for return period 2, 10, 25, 50, 100 and 1000 years are calculated. Gumbel give an expected flood 521.72 cumecs while Log Pearson III give an expected flood of 493.17 cumecs for 2 years return period. It is observed that Gumbel estimated a higher values for all the said return period except for 1000 years where Log Pearson III predicted a much higher values. Goodness of test show inconsistent results. While Chi-squared test indicate Gumbel Method as the better model, the other two tests show that Log Pearson III is the better fitting model for the given dataset. Therefore, Log Pearson III is chosen as the best model. However, the results from both the distributions can be referred for storm management.

scholarly journals Comparison Between Bivariate and Trivariate Flood Frequency Analysis Using the Archimedean Copula Functions, A Case Study of the Karun River in Iran

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Haytham Klaho ◽  
Hamid R. Safavi ◽  
Mohamad H. Golmohammadi ◽  
Maamoun Alkntar
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Return Period ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Archimedean Copula ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Cumulative Probability ◽  
Copula Functions ◽  
Flood Peak ◽  
Multiple Variables

Abstract Historically, severe floods have caused great human and financial losses. Therefore, the flood frequency analysis based on the flood multiple variables including flood peak, volume and duration poses more motivation for hydrologists to study. In this paper, the bivariate and trivariate flood frequency analysis and modeling using Archimedean copula functions is focused. For this purpose, the annual flood data over a 55-year historical period recorded at the Dez Dam hydrometric station were used. The results showed that based on goodness of fit criteria, the Frank function built upon the couple of the flood peak-volume and the couple of the flood peak-duration as well as the Clayton function built upon the flood volume-duration were identified to be the best copula families to be adopted. The trivariate analysis was conducted and the Clayton family was chosen as the best copula function. Thereafter, the common and conditional cumulative probability distribution functions were built and analyzed to determine the periodic "and", "or" and "conditional" bivariate and trivariate flood return periods. The results suggest that the bivariate conditional return period obtained for short-term periods is more reliable than the trivariate conditional return period. Additionally, the trivariate conditional return period calculated for long-term periods is more reliable than the bivariate conditional return period.

Analysis of Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in the Damanganga Basin: Western India

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Vitthal Anwat ◽  
Pramodkumar Hire ◽  
Uttam Pawar ◽  
Rajendra Gunjal
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Western India ◽  
Type I ◽  
Return Periods ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Kolmogorov Smirnov ◽  
Anderson Darling

Flood Frequency Analysis (FFA) method was introduced by Fuller in 1914 to understand the magnitude and frequency of floods. The present study is carried out using the two most widely accepted probability distributions for FFA in the world namely, Gumbel Extreme Value type I (GEVI) and Log Pearson type III (LP-III). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) and Anderson-Darling (AD) methods were used to select the most suitable probability distribution at sites in the Damanganga Basin. Moreover, discharges were estimated for various return periods using GEVI and LP-III. The recurrence interval of the largest peak flood on record (Qmax) is 107 years (at Nanipalsan) and 146 years (at Ozarkhed) as per LP-III. Flood Frequency Curves (FFC) specifies that LP-III is the best-fitted probability distribution for FFA of the Damanganga Basin. Therefore, estimated discharges and return periods by LP-III probability distribution are more reliable and can be used for designing hydraulic structures.

scholarly journals Hydrological model calibration for derived flood frequency analysis using stochastic rainfall and probability distributions of peak flows

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 353-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Haberlandt ◽  
I. Radtke
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Peak Flows ◽  
Hourly Rainfall

Abstract. Derived flood frequency analysis allows the estimation of design floods with hydrological modeling for poorly observed basins considering change and taking into account flood protection measures. There are several possible choices regarding precipitation input, discharge output and consequently the calibration of the model. The objective of this study is to compare different calibration strategies for a hydrological model considering various types of rainfall input and runoff output data sets and to propose the most suitable approach. Event based and continuous, observed hourly rainfall data as well as disaggregated daily rainfall and stochastically generated hourly rainfall data are used as input for the model. As output, short hourly and longer daily continuous flow time series as well as probability distributions of annual maximum peak flow series are employed. The performance of the strategies is evaluated using the obtained different model parameter sets for continuous simulation of discharge in an independent validation period and by comparing the model derived flood frequency distributions with the observed one. The investigations are carried out for three mesoscale catchments in northern Germany with the hydrological model HEC-HMS (Hydrologic Engineering Center's Hydrologic Modeling System). The results show that (I) the same type of precipitation input data should be used for calibration and application of the hydrological model, (II) a model calibrated using a small sample of extreme values works quite well for the simulation of continuous time series with moderate length but not vice versa, and (III) the best performance with small uncertainty is obtained when stochastic precipitation data and the observed probability distribution of peak flows are used for model calibration. This outcome suggests to calibrate a hydrological model directly on probability distributions of observed peak flows using stochastic rainfall as input if its purpose is the application for derived flood frequency analysis.

scholarly journals Some best‐fit probability distributions for at‐site flood frequency analysis of the Ume River

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samara Kousar ◽  
Abrar Raza Khan ◽  
Mahmood Ul Hassan ◽  
Zahra Noreen ◽  
Sajjad Haider Bhatti
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Best Fit

scholarly journals Flood frequency analysis for annual maximum streamflow using a non-stationary GEV model

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 03022
Author(s):  
Shangwen Jiang ◽  
Ling Kang
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Return Period ◽  
Yangtze River ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Additive Models ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Annual Maximum ◽  
The Yangtze River ◽  
Stationary Model ◽  
Risk Of Failure

Under changing environment, the streamflow series in the Yangtze River have undergone great changes and it has raised widespread concerns. In this study, the annual maximum flow (AMF) series at the Yichang station were used for flood frequency analysis, in which a time varying model was constructed to account for non-stationarity. The generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution was adopted to fit the AMF series, and the Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) framework was applied for parameter estimation. The non-stationary return period and risk of failure were calculated and compared for flood risk assessment between stationary and non-stationary models. The results demonstrated that the flow regime at the Yichang station has changed over time and a decreasing trend was detected in the AMF series. The design flood peak given a return period decreased in the non-stationary model, and the risk of failure is also smaller given a design life, which indicated a safer flood condition in the future compared with the stationary model. The conclusions in this study may contribute to long-term decision making in the Yangtze River basin under non-stationary conditions.

scholarly journals Process-based flood frequency analysis in an agricultural watershed exhibiting nonstationary flood seasonality

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 2225-2243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guo Yu ◽  
Daniel B. Wright ◽  
Zhihua Zhu ◽  
Cassia Smith ◽  
Kathleen D. Holman
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Extreme Rainfall ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Agricultural Watershed ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Antecedent Conditions ◽  
Hydrologic Change

Abstract. Floods are the product of complex interactions among processes including precipitation, soil moisture, and watershed morphology. Conventional flood frequency analysis (FFA) methods such as design storms and discharge-based statistical methods offer few insights into these process interactions and how they “shape” the probability distributions of floods. Understanding and projecting flood frequency in conditions of nonstationary hydroclimate and land use require deeper understanding of these processes, some or all of which may be changing in ways that will be undersampled in observational records. This study presents an alternative “process-based” FFA approach that uses stochastic storm transposition to generate large numbers of realistic rainstorm “scenarios” based on relatively short rainfall remote sensing records. Long-term continuous hydrologic model simulations are used to derive seasonally varying distributions of watershed antecedent conditions. We couple rainstorm scenarios with seasonally appropriate antecedent conditions to simulate flood frequency. The methodology is applied to the 4002 km2 Turkey River watershed in the Midwestern United States, which is undergoing significant climatic and hydrologic change. We show that, using only 15 years of rainfall records, our methodology can produce accurate estimates of “present-day” flood frequency. We found that shifts in the seasonality of soil moisture, snow, and extreme rainfall in the Turkey River exert important controls on flood frequency. We also demonstrate that process-based techniques may be prone to errors due to inadequate representation of specific seasonal processes within hydrologic models. If such mistakes are avoided, however, process-based approaches can provide a useful pathway toward understanding current and future flood frequency in nonstationary conditions and thus be valuable for supplementing existing FFA practices.

scholarly journals Flood Frequency Analysis at the Downstream of Sg. Perak River Basin using Annual Maximum Flow Discharge Data

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.35) ◽  
pp. 709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munir Snu ◽  
Sidek L.M ◽  
Haron Sh ◽  
Noh Ns.M ◽  
Basri H ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Return Period ◽  
Maximum Flow ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Annual Maximum ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
Flow Discharge

The recent flood event occurred in 2014 had caused disaster in Perak and Sungai Perak is the main river of Perak which is a major natural drainage system within the state. The aim of this paper is to determine the expected discharge to return period downstream for Sg. Perak River Basin in Perak by using annual maximum flow data. Flood frequency analysis is a technique to assume the flow values corresponding to specific return periods or probabilities along the river at a different site. The method involves the observed annual maximum flow discharge data to calculate statistical information such as standard deviations, mean, sum, skewness and recurrence intervals. The flood frequency analysis for Sg. Perak River Basin was used Log Pearson Type-III probability distribution method. The annual maximum peak flow series data varying over period 1961 to 2016. The probability distribution function was applied to return periods (T) where T values are 2years, 5years, 10years, 25years, 50years, and 100years generally used in flood forecasting. Flood frequency curves are plotted after the choosing the best fits probability distribution for annual peak maximum data. The results for flood frequency analysis shows that Sg. Perak at Jambatan Iskandar much higher inflow discharge  which is 3714.45m3/s at the 100years return period compare to Sg. Plus at Kg Lintang and Sg. Kinta at Weir G. With this, the 100years peak flow at Sg Perak river mouth is estimated to be in the range of 4,000 m3/s. Overall, the analysis relates the expected flow discharge to return period for all tributaries of Sg. Perak River Basin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document