scholarly journals Sustainable Public Procurement and Human Rights: Barriers to Deliver on Socially Sustainable Road Infrastructure Projects in Mexico

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 9605
Author(s):  
Laura Treviño-Lozano

Public procurement involves a process through which the public sector buys goods, services and works from private suppliers to accomplish its functions, including road infrastructure projects. Sustainability, both within the procurement process and the infrastructure outcome, comprises economic, environmental and social dimensions. Sustainable Public Procurement (SPP) is acknowledged as a core dimension of sustainable development goal 12 (SDG12) on sustainable consumption by States and production by businesses, and as a State-business nexus within Pilar I of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). Clearly, SPP delivering sustainable infrastructure involves broad positive effects and benefits for involved stakeholders and leveraging power over business suppliers to include social sustainable criteria within the procurement process is in the State’s hands. However, SPP has been little implemented in developing States such as Mexico resulting in unsustainable infrastructure outcomes. This article explores, through two case studies, the barriers of socially sustainable public procurement of road infrastructure developed by businesses contracted by the State in Mexico. By identifying such barriers, the Mexican State could be able to implement measures to tackle them and deliver on social sustainable infrastructure aligned with its commitments on sustainable development goals and its international obligations on human rights.

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilesh Agarchand Patil ◽  
Nicola Thounaojam ◽  
Boeing Laishram

Purpose Increasingly adopted by various governments for infrastructure development, public-private partnerships (PPPs) have become a popular procurement delivery system, outperforming other systems. However, PPPs have been especially criticised due to the lack of sustainability aspect during the development and implementation of the projects. In India, similar critiques have been raised, as these qualities have inhibited the development of society and increased the time and cost overrun in the development of PPP projects. This paper, therefore, aims to address the sustainability issues in PPPs and systematically analyses from the perspective of the principles of sustainable development. Design/methodology/approach Based on literature review and focussed interviews with stakeholders in India, a qualitative system dynamics (SD) model using causal loop diagramming is developed to propose the inclusion of various strategies in the PPP procurement process, which can enhance the sustainability of the PPP process. Finally, the integration of these strategies in the current PPP procurement process has been highlighted in the form of the introduction of new mechanisms and policies and modification of the existing mechanism and procurement policies. Findings The paper first highlights key sustainability issues in the PPP procurement process and suggests 34 strategies to address the issues. The modelling approaches and the proposed strategies, along with their interrelationships, could help the PPP decision makers in implementing responsive policies in bringing sustainable development in the PPP procurement process. Research limitations/implications The SD model developed is based on limited data, primarily focussed on PPP procurement practices in the context of infrastructure development in India. Developing the model with the analysis of a wider range of data and constructing a customised model can take broader perspectives into account. Social implications Adoption of the identified strategies can facilitate the inclusion of sustainability practices in the development of infrastructure projects, which are even procured using private finance. Originality/value Studies on how to promote sustainable infrastructure development when procured through the PPP route are in the nascent stage. This study, therefore, extends the current body of knowledge on infrastructure projects implementation through PPPs from financial engineering and risk management to a sustainability perspective.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 4162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengqin Zheng ◽  
Ke Xu ◽  
Qing He ◽  
Shaoze Fang ◽  
Lin Zhang

In China, the demand for public infrastructure projects is high due to the acceleration of urbanization and the rapid growth of the economy in recent years. Infrastructures are mainly large scale, so local governments have difficulty in independently completing financing work. In this context, public sectors often seek cooperation from private sectors, in which public–private partnership (PPP) is increasingly common. Although numerous studies have concentrated on sustainable development, the unsustainability performances of infrastructures are often reported on various media. Furthermore, studies on the sustainability performances of PPP-type infrastructure (PTI) projects are few from the perspective of private sectors’ behaviors. In this study, we adopted the modified theory of planned behavior and the structure equation model and conducted a questionnaire survey with 258 respondents for analyzing the sustainable behaviors of private sectors. Results indicated that behavioral attitude, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norm interact significantly. They have direct positive effects on behavioral intention and then indirectly influence actual behavior through this intention. Actual sustainable behaviors of private sectors have significantly positive effects on the sustainable development of cities. We offer theoretical and managerial implications for public and private sectors on the basis of the findings to ensure and promote the sustainability performances of PTI projects.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-29
Author(s):  
Violeta Simionescu

Abstract This paper examines the need for a Public Procurement Maturity Model (PPMM) in organizations with the role of road infrastructure buyers under public procurement legislation in a monopsony market structure. The environment used to contextualize the information is Romania and CNADNR (Compania Națională de Autostrăzi și Drumuri Naționale din România). The literature research, open data as well as my own practical experience are used as entry data for the four parts of the paper: (i) the context leading to the PPMM need identification, (ii) an overview of the existing public (procurement) maturity models; (iii) discussions and (iv) summary, limitations, and outlook. The paper provides arguments of an upstream intervention in the value chain of road transport infrastructure and highlights the benefits of such an intervention. Elements such as Romanian cultural dimensions, type of market structure or impact of the outcomes of public procurement process for road infrastructure are considered relevant entry data for an intervention which aims to contribute to the improvement of performance at a procurement process level. The results of this paper serve as a starting point for further reflection on the performance in road infrastructure public procurement area in Romania. In addition to the awareness of the need for an intervention at a contracting authority level, the paper arguments that market structure or national cultural dimensions must be considered as entry data in designing maturity models.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-221
Author(s):  
Inese Pelša

Abstract Green public procurement (GPP) is an instrument for public institutions that have made sustainable consumption and financial aids savings, particularly taking into consideration expenses of the total life cycle of the agreement, not just the procurement price. Municipalities are important to promotion of sustainable consumption through their positive effects on citizens and other stakeholders. The present paper analyses the contribution of municipalities of the Republic of Latvia in developing sustainable consumption through GPP. The aim of the paper is to explore the development of GPP in municipalities, analysing influencing factors. By analysing data from the Procurement Supervision Agency and the State Regional Development Agency, the proportion of GPP is explored. The paper includes data collected in a survey of municipalities of Latvia aiming to identify the main factors that promote the development of GPP and the ones that are obstacles for implementing the GPP. The conclusions show that GPP is a relatively new activity in Latvia, especially in relation to sustainable consumption. Analytical, graphic, statistical research methods as well as other qualitative and quantitative research methods have been used in the research.


Author(s):  
Kristine Ek ◽  
Alexandre Mathern ◽  
Rasmus Rempling ◽  
Lars Rosén ◽  
Christina Claeson-Jonsson ◽  
...  

<p>The construction of infrastructure projects represents a large sustainability impact, both positive and negative. Increased positive and reduced negative impacts can be achieved through better design and planning of the construction. To make more sustainable choices, well-defined predictive sustainability assessment methods are required. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a well- suited method for predictive sustainability assessment. This paper evaluates two MCDA methods for sustainability assessment of infrastructure construction and exemplifies their application with two case studies. The aim of this paper is to discuss if the methods are suitable for identifying the most sustainable alternative during the procurement process of an infrastructure project. It is recommended that MCDA methods are further developed to comply with the recently published EN standard on sustainability assessment of civil engineering works.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 6273
Author(s):  
Magnus Hellström ◽  
Kim Wikström ◽  
Kent Eriksson

Sustainability involves multiple environmental, technical, social and economic factors, and such complex analysis requires systemic solutions. Delivery models are key to achieving system benefits and enhancing sustainable development in infrastructure investments. They define the phases of a project, incentive structures, risk sharing and the relationships among the actors in it. They are usually developed early in the project and determine the project dynamics and outcomes. We compared traditional delivery models with systemic ones. We identified and illustrated elements that differ between them through two cases. The contribution is an increased understanding of how systemic infrastructure delivery models can adapt to changes in their environment. We also found that sustainability is vastly under-researched in systemic infrastructure delivery, but that its potential to deliver benefits to PPP infrastructures is substantial.


Author(s):  
Aisulu Kazbekova ◽  
Nur-Akhmet Alimkulov ◽  
Ainagul Karipova

One of the main factors of sustainable development of any economy include public procurement, through which are placed a considerable part of orders of state bodies at the expense of Republican and local budgets (in 2019 70% of the budget). The procurement process is regulated by the Law "on public procurement", about 23 orders of the Ministry of Finance and Government resolutions. About a third of the Law's provisions (32.7 %) are duplicated in the procurement Rules. Moreover, an analog of this law has been developed – the draft Law "on procurement of certain subjects of the quasi-public sector". The multiplicity of legal acts complicates the procurement process, the possibility of in-house control of the legality of procedures, which creates high corruption risks. As practice has shown, the main criminal schemes are lobbying for the interests of" their suppliers", overpricing, affiliation of suppliers, illegal" margin", fraud with technical specifications, signing fictitious acts, overpricing. The article provides the elements of the forensic characteristics of corruption offenses in the field of public procurement: the mechanism of committing, the trace picture, the reasons and conditions.


2020 ◽  
pp. 278-286
Author(s):  
GVANTSA SISOSHVILI

The spread of the new coronavirus in the world, including in Georgia, had a significant negative impact on both public and private organizations, which has affected the public procurement process in the country. Georgia has spent a large amount of money to deal with the virus. As a result, administrative costs have been reduced in order to finance the 2020 state budget deficit - 57 million GEL for labor costs and 107 million GEL for goods and services. It should be noted that 195 million GEL is used on arranging quarantine spaces and other additional health care costs while 1.31 billion GEL is provided for goods and services. During the pandemic, demand from the state increased significantly in the health sector, while declining in other areas, many planned purchases were canceled, tenders were not held, were suspended or their announcement was delayed. This has affected companies whose major activities include state orders. Also rising inflation and currency devaluation have made goods and services more expensive. Consequently, complex problems arose for the entities participating in public procurement, namely: - From the moment the first case of the virus was reported in Georgia, it became mandatory for public and private organizations to follow the recommendations of the World Health Organization and the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health. So, large amount of money was spent on hygiene, disinfection and other means of protecting against the virus to ensure the safety of customers and employees. - Some public and private organizations continued to work remotely, for which they incurred additional costs for equipping employees at home (with computer or other technological resources). Other organizations, which were not prohibited the operation, funded the transportation of staff to the workplace, because of emergency was declared and public transport was restricted. - In order to free up financial resources, procurement organizations have restricted the announcement of planned tenders. Even the winner had already been identified or the bidder had been invited to sign the contract. At the same time, according to the Unified Public Procurement Electronic System a number of tenders have been suspended, including largescale infrastructure projects, most of which were in the selection stage or successful bidder was revealed and invited to sign the contract. - Due to the global pandemic, most companies failed to meet their contractual obligations on time. Contract authorities change the terms of the contract, including increased delivery time and services. In the case of infrastructure projects, based on the decree of the Government of Georgia, contract authorities were given the right to increase the contract value by 10% -20% in order to finance the increase of supplier costs on construction materials - Amendments were made to the legislation governing public procurement. For example, Procurement of goods and services under the many of CPV codes were restricted to contract authorities without the consent of the Government of Georgia. In the original version of the resolution, only 30 out of 200 codes were restricted, and from April 1, 2020, the number of restricted CPV codes has increased to 160. There are number of classified goods and services, whose purchase does not require government consent: agricultural and food products, outerwear, pharmaceutical products, miscellaneous transport equipment and spare parts, Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work, laboratory services, refuse and waste related services. Because agreement with the government and electronic procedures takes a long time, procurement organizations were forced to purchase goods and services through a simplified procurement in the case of urgent necessity. This means that in accordance with the law, the contract authorities directly signed a contract with the company and after agreed with the State Procurement Agency. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the additional costs incurred in the field of public procurement due to the coronavirus to make predictions about the procurement process for the next year.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 642-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilesh Agarchand ◽  
Boeing Laishram

Purpose Infrastructure development through public-private partnership (PPP) route in India has exhibited concerns about not promoting progress toward sustainable development goals, particularly social and environmental perspectives. The purpose of this paper is, therefore, to identify the shortcomings in the Indian PPP procurement process using the key principles of sustainability. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative research inquiry through grounded theory approach by using the literature and interview source was used to identify the challenges encountered in sustainable infrastructure development of PPP projects. These challenges were, first, reviewed from the perspectives of key sustainability principles and then discussed with the key stakeholders through focused interviews. Furthermore, micro-interlocutor analysis was carried to get an insight on the extent of consensus amongst the experts regarding these identified shortfalls. Findings The key shortfalls identified from the study that adversely affect progress toward sustainable development include incomprehensive environmental impact assessment and social impact assessment studies; lack of stakeholder and local participation; high bidding and transaction cost; high user charges; improper risk allocation; lack of transparency and accountability; goal conflicts between public and private sector; and lack of skill and knowledge about sustainability. Practical implications The study findings will help in devising appropriate strategies for enhancing the mechanisms, policies, and governance structure of PPP process in order to overcome these shortfalls and help in accomplishing the goals of sustainability while developing infrastructure even through PPP route. Originality/value The paper presents different insights into PPP from sustainability perspective which has not been the focus of the current studies on PPPs. Sustainability assessment of PPP procurement is an area of research which is in a nascent stage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document