scholarly journals Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Safety: Evidence from Korea

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 2649
Author(s):  
Ja Eun Koo ◽  
Eun Sun Ki

Employees are an integral part of a company’s sustainable growth and they expect a safe working environment. Therefore, analyzing the factors that affect employee safety is important. In this context, we analyze the effect of corporate social responsibility investment on employee safety. Using Korean listed company data from 2012 to 2014, we regress corporate social responsibility scores on workplace injuries. The Ordinary Least Square (OLS) regression results show that higher corporate social responsibility scores are associated with fewer working days lost owing to workplace injuries. Moreover, while workplace injuries have a clear negative effect on firm value, corporate social responsibility activity significantly reduces this negative effect. Our findings imply that investment in corporate social responsibility can improve workplace safety and contribute to a company’s sustainable growth.

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 28-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kartika Hendra Titisari ◽  
M. Moeljadi ◽  
Kusuma Ratnawati ◽  
Nur Khusniyah Indrawati

Corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) are important subjects for corporate sustainability that affect firm value (FV). At the same time research results in several countries provide diverse empirical evidence. This study analyzes the impact of corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firm value (FV) through the cost of capital (CoC) in public companies of Indonesia. The research sample includes 27 companies that publish sustainability reports and corporate governance reports, with an observation period from 2010 till 2016. This study presents the analysis of three firm value proxies (Tobin’s q (TQ), Price Earnings Ratio (PER), and Price to Book Value (PBV)). Results of hypotheses testing using Partial Least Squares (PLS) show that CG and CSR have both direct and indirect effects on FV. These findings are consistent for all three firm value assessments. According to direct testing, CG has a negative effect on FV, while CSR has a positive effect. The CoC acts as a mediating variable in this relationship. The CG and CSR have a negative effect on CoC, while CoC has a negative effect on FV. The findings show that CG and CSR can improve the company performance and corporate image internally and externally, thereby increasing the investors` confidence, and companies have the opportunity to obtain inexpensive funding sources that can reduce CoC. A decrease in CoC can increase profitability and have an impact on FV increasing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-354
Author(s):  
Kamaliah Kamaliah

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of corporate governance and corporate profitability on firm value with corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure as the intervening variable. Design/methodology/approach The population of this study was all companies listed in the LQ 45 Index group in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2014. The inferential statistics used in this study applied the partial least square (PLS) based structural equation model (SEM) method with the assistance of SmartPLS 2.0. The PLS method was selected based on the consideration that there was a construct formed with reflective indicators in this study. Findings From the results of this study, it can be concluded that corporate governance does not have any effect on CSR disclosure, profitability of company has an effect on CSR disclosure, CSR disclosure has an effect on firm value. In addition, CSR disclosure does not mediate the effect of on firm value. These results showed that corporate governance can have an effect on firm value directly, and there is no role of CSR disclosure in mediating the effect of corporate governance on firm value, and profitability of company has an effect on firm value through CSR disclosure. Originality/value The originality of this research is on the reason that many studies that have been conducted still indicated the inconsistency in the results and diversity of the indicators, so that a similar research was conducted by involving the indicators used for measuring the corporate governance variable, which were the proportion of independent commissioners and audit committee. Meanwhile, for the profitability variable, return on assets and return on equity were used as the indicators.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-65
Author(s):  
Riska Andriani ◽  
Jubi Jubi ◽  
Ady Inrawan ◽  
Christine Dewi Nainggolan

The Purpose of this research is to describe profitability, corporate social responsibility and firm value and to know influence of profitability and corporate social responsibility to firm value at PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama, Tbk listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange. The research was using qualitative and quantitative desriptive analysis. The data collection was using documentation. The analysis techniques used are multiple linear regression, correlation coeffient, coefficient of determination, F test and t test.The result of the research are 1. The average of profitability (return on assets) tends to increase, the average of corporate social responsibility (NH Approach) tends to increase, and the average of firm value (price to book value) tends to incrase. 2. The results of multiple linier regression is known that profitability has a negative effect, while corporate social responsibility has a positive effect on the firm value. 3. The results of the analysis of the correlation coefficient and correlation of determination can be concluded that the relationship between profitability and corporate social responsibility to firm value is very high and only a few are influenced by other variables not explained in this study. 4. The results of testing hypotheses can be concluded that profitability has a significant negative effect and corporate social responsibility has a significant positive effect on firm value.As for suggestions from this research are important for the company to maintain the stability of return on assets, NH Approach and price to book valueKeywords: Profitability, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Firm Value


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 148
Author(s):  
Zainab Masitha ◽  
Djuminah

This study aims to find out empirical evidence about the influence of corporate governance on firm value through intellectual capital and corporate social responsibility. The sample used in this study amounted to 123 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange continuously during the period 2015-2017 using purposive sampling technique. This study uses quantitative methods with secondary data obtained from annual reports that have been published by the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2015-2017, which can be accessed through www.idx.co.id. Data analysis in this study uses Structural Equation Modeling based on Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) with SmartPLS 3.0 software.The results showed that the board of commissioners had a significant negative effect on intellectual capital and had a significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility. Board of Commissioners has a significant positive effect on intellectual capital and has a significant negative effect on corporate social responsibility. The board of commissioners, audit committees, intellectual capital and corporate social responsibility have a positive and significant effect on firm value. Intellectual capital is not able to mediate the relationship between the board of commissioners and firm value, as well as the relationship of the audit committee to firm value. CSR is not able to mediate the relationship between the board of commissioners and firm value and the relationship between the audit committee and firm value.


Akuntabilitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-104
Author(s):  
Umi Muawanah ◽  
Nurul Hayati

The empirical evidence of the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and company value is still inconclusive and raises a discussion space for researchers about what and how it affects. This study aims to analyze these. The analysis model was compiled by covering four control variables namely size, market share, leverage, and company growth. The results of the Regression analysis showed that the CSR disclosure index had a negative effect on firm value. This effect occurs when the analysis model includes four contextual variables. However, if the analysis did not include four control variables in the model, the results were opposite. These results have the following research implications as well as subject to methodological limitations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
Bima Andika Ivanda Putra ◽  
Sunarto Sunarto

This study aims to analyze and test the effect of profitability, leverage, and managerial ownership on firm value with the moderating variable, namely Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The population used in this study is all manufacturing companies that have been listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the last three years, namely 2017-2019. The sampling method used in this study was purposive sampling technique. The results of this study explain that profitability and leverage do not have an effect on firm value, while managerial ownership has a negative effect on firm value. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is able to moderate the effect of profitability and managerial ownership on firm value, while Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is unable to moderate the effect of leverage on firm value.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-101
Author(s):  
Volta Diyanto ◽  
Riska Natariasari

This research aims to analyze the effect of good corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, and the firm size towards the firm value. The population was banking firms listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2015-2018. Samples used were 28 firms. The analysis method used multiple linear regression. The research results show that managerial ownership does not have effect towards the firm value. Institutional ownership and firm size have positive effect towards the firm value. Corporate social responsibility has negative effect towards the company value.


Author(s):  
Mukhtaruddin Mukhtaruddin ◽  
Ubaidillah Ubaidillah ◽  
Kencana Dewi ◽  
Arista Hakiki ◽  
Nopriyanto Nopriyanto

Good corporate governance and corporate social responsibility can assist the company in facing the challenges and risks as a strategy in increasing the firm value by building the right image from the stakeholders’ view. This study aims to determine the effect of good corporate governance and corporate social responsibility on firm value with financial performance as a moderating variable. The population of this research is banking companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for 2011–2015. The sample consisted of 23 companies which were selected by purposive random sampling. This data is analyzed by using Partial Least Square approach. The results of this study indicate that good corporate governance has an insignificant positive effect on firm value; otherwise corporate social responsibility has a significant negative impact on firm value. Financial performance has significantly strengthened the relationship between good corporate governance and corporate social responsibility on firm value.


Author(s):  
Arna Suryani

Objective – This research aims to find out how corporate social responsibility as an intervening variable on voluntary disclosure and earning responses coefficient. Methodology/Technique – The research sample was retrieved from LQ45 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange which consistently disclosure annual reports and sustainability reports for the period of 2017-2018. In analyzing the data, Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) with the support of SmartPLS (Partial Least Square) are used. Findings – Results show that voluntary disclosure has a positive and significant effect towards earning responses coefficient while voluntary disclosure has a negative effect towards corporate social responsibility. Moreover, corporate social responsibility also shows a negative effect towards Earning responses coefficient. Voluntary disclosure with corporate social responsibility as an intervening variable also shows a negative effect towards Earning responses coefficient.Voluntary disclosure can explain the variability of corporate social responsibility construct of 13,2%. Meanwhile, voluntary disclosure and corporate social responsibility can explain the variability of earning response coefficient construct of 22,7%, so that those two values are categorized as weak. Novelty – The results indicate that investors did not pay attention to the information of ccorporate social responsibility (CSR) that are shown in the annual financial reports. However, they give a positive response to voluntary disclosure of the company so that it effects the increase of Earning response coefficient. Type of Paper: Empirical Keywords: Voluntary Disclosure; Corporate Social Responsibility; Earning Responses Coefficient. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Suryani, A; 2019. Voluntary Disclosure and Earning Responses Coefficient and with Corporate Social Responsibility as Intervening Variable, Acc. Fin. Review 4 (3): 72 – 78 https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2019.4.3(2) JEL Classification: G40, G41, G49.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-30
Author(s):  
Irbahiya Aqsa Griselda ◽  
Werner Ria Murhadi ◽  
Mudji Utami

The aims of this research is to analyze the effect of corporate social responsibility, leverage, firm size and firm size towards firm performance using return on assets and Tobin’s Q as a proxy in mining sector companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange and Malaysia Stock Exchange in the period 2014-2018. This research uses quantitative approach with two least square regression analysis model. This study uses sample of firms which are listed on mining in IDX and MYX on 2014-2018. The findings result of this research CSR have positive and significant effect towards firm performance in mining sector companies BEI on the period 2014-2018, while CSR insignificant effect towards firm performance in mining sector companies BEM on the period 2014-2018. Keywords: corporate social responsibility, financial performance, firm value


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document