scholarly journals CEO Tenure, Corporate Social Performance, and Corporate Governance: A Korean Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Jun Hyeok Choi ◽  
Saerona Kim ◽  
Ayoung Lee
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Chief Executive ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Board Diversity ◽  
Ceo Tenure ◽  
Corporate Social

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between Chief Executive Officer (CEO) tenure and corporate social performance with the moderating effect of governance. We investigated whether new CEOs and CEOs in their last year of service were more focused on short-termism than CEOs of other periods. Specifically, we tested whether these CEOs reduced social performance that demands immediate expenditure and expect payoffs in the long run. We also tested whether good governance can mitigate such behaviors, because not all CEOs of the same tenure will act the same, depending on the monitoring environments surrounding them. We employed ordinary least squares (OLS) method and the moderator models using data from the Korean listed companies from 2012 to 2016. Test results showed that only the CEOs of their last year reduced social performance. However, when we considered corporate governance, we found that both groups of CEOs reduced social performance, and that good governance mitigated the adverse effects of the two periods on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Specifically, we tested board independence, board frequency, CEO duality, and board diversity, and found that, for all but board independence, the negative effects of the two periods on social performance were decreased.

scholarly journals When Do Women Make a Better Table? Examining the Influence of Women Directors on Family Firm’s Corporate Social Performance

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Cruz ◽  
Rachida Justo ◽  
Martín Larraza-Kintana ◽  
Lucía Garcés-Galdeano
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Family Firm ◽  
Relative Power ◽  
Women Directors ◽  
Board Diversity ◽  
Empirical Results ◽  
Corporate Social

Our paper seeks to further understand the influence of gender board diversity on firms’ corporate social performance (CPS) in the context of publicly held family firms. Grounded on corporate governance and family firm literature, we argue that the influence of women directors on CSP will be contingent on their relative power and legitimacy within the board, and that such dynamics are particularly important in family firm boardrooms. Our empirical results show that increases in CSP associated with the presence of women in the boards of family firms are due mainly to the presence of outsider nonfamily and insider family women directors. Implications for the theory of family firms are discussed.

Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 641-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Jui Huang
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Outside Directors ◽  
Asian Economy ◽  
Corporate Social

AbstractPrevious research has analyzed and debated corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) independently. This paper aims to empirically explore the interrelationship between CG, CSR, financial performance (FP) and Corporate Social Performance (CSP) using a sample of 297 electronics companies operating in Taiwan, a newly industrialized Asian economy. The results show that a CG model which includes independent outside directors and which has specific ownership characteristics has a significantly positive impact on both FP and CSP, whereas FP itself does not influence CSP. The presence of independent outside directors in the firm has the greatest impact on the social performance of the firm's worker, customer, supplier, community and society dimensions. Government shareholders enhance a firm's social performance extraordinarily because government shareholders will be more likely to request that companies fulfill their social responsibilities. Only government shareholders positively and significantly relate to a firm's environmental performance. Furthermore, foreign institutional stockholders help to increase worker and supplier performance by paying more attention to employee policies and supply chain relationships. Finally, independent outside directors, foreign institutional stockholders and domestic financial institutional stockholders are shown to improve financial performance.

scholarly journals CEO Characteristics, Family Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: The Case of Saudi Arabia

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 12237
Author(s):  
Shaker Dahan AL-Duais ◽  
Ameen Qasem ◽  
Wan Nordin Wan-Hussin ◽  
Hasan Mohamad Bamahros ◽  
Murad Thomran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Chief Executive ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Family Ownership ◽  
Family Control ◽  
Csr Reporting ◽  
Ceo Tenure ◽  
Corporate Social

Only a few studies have investigated the association between the characteristics of the chief executive officer (CEO) (i.e., tenure and local or expatriate) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting. Our study adds to the fledgling literature by providing new evidence from Saudi Arabia. Given the dominance of family control among Saudi Arabian listed firms, additionally, this study examined the moderating effect of family ownership on the CEO-CSR relationship. Using CSR scores from Bloomberg database from 2010 to 2019 and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, the findings reveal that the association between CEO tenure and CSR reporting is positively significant; however, the association between CEO nationality and CSR is not significant. In addition, the findings indicate that family ownership is an important contingency factor that explains the association between CEO tenure and CEO nationality, and CSR reporting. Our study contributes to an emerging line of CSR research that investigates the effects of foreign CEOs on CSR transparency, and supports prior evidence on the benefits to investors of having long-serving CEO and the costs of family entrenchment.

scholarly journals Family Firms And Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Preliminary Evidence From The French Stock Market

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Issam Laguir ◽  
Jamal Elbaz
Keyword(s):  
Family Member ◽  
Family Involvement ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Least Squares Regression ◽  
Corporate Social

This paper examines the CSR practices of family firms listed in the French financial market and distinguishes between those managed by a family member CEO and those managed by a competent external CEO. We adopt an exploratory approach and begin with a content analysis of the annual reports from family firms listed in the CAC 40 index during the 2005-2011 period. We then conduct various statistical techniques (e.g., Pearson correlation analysis and ordinary least squares regression analysis) to study the relationships among social performance and family involvement. This paper is the first to provide a preliminary assessment of French family firms CSR practices in the current economic context. The study suggests that family firms intensify their CSR efforts during the 2005-2011 period. Our study also reveals that family firms managed by competent external CEOs show better social performance than those managed by family member CEOs. Indeed, the empirical results consistently show a negative and statistically significant association between family involvement and corporate social performance.

Employees and Corporate Social Performance

2009 ◽  
pp. 327-333
Author(s):  
Punit Arora
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Employment Relations ◽  
Stakeholder Relationships ◽  
Stakeholder Influence ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Over 30 years of research on the relationship between corporate social performance (CSP) and financial performance (FP) has yielded no conclusive results. Researchers have tried to legitimize (or discredit) social performance on the basis of its surmised impact on corporate profitability. However, the empirical evidence on the topic has been as divisive as the theoretical propositioning. By reviewing the theory and evidence on the topic, this article puts forth four intertwined propositions that could be confounding these results: failure to consider the impact of corporate governance, lumping together all sorts of expenditures under the rubric of social performance, failure to consider the stakeholder relationships, and above all, not accounting for the past reputation and stakeholder influence capacity of the firm. In particular, we contend that it is the employment relations that run like a common thread among these factors and hold the key to the dynamics of CSP-FP link.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document