scholarly journals CSR Committees and Their Effect on ESG Performance in UK, France, Germany, and Spain

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (18) ◽  
pp. 5077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Baraibar-Diez ◽  
María D. Odriozola
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Panel Data Models ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Independent Variables ◽  
Social Governance ◽  
Multidisciplinary Nature ◽  
Governance Models ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Corporate Social

The multidisciplinary nature of a corporate social responsibility (CSR) committee reflects the commitment as well as the expectations and demands of diverse stakeholders. So far, CSR committees have been mainly considered as variables of control in larger corporate governance models and independent variables that determine CSR or environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure and its reporting quality. However, the effect on corporate performance has been biased to financial performance, so the potential of the analysis of the effect it may have on different facets of non-financial performance has not been exploited. Which it should, since it can be a fundamental tool to achieve sustainability. The objective of this contribution is to test whether companies with a CSR committee not only leads to higher economic scores, but also to higher ESG (environmental, social, governance) scores. To do this, we used regression panel data models in 197 listed firms in Spain, France, Germany, and the UK during the period 2005–2015 including the perspective of European organizations and completing the extant studies in US-based samples. Our results showed that 90% of companies in the sample had a CSR committee in 2014, and that those companies had significantly different ESG scores than those without a CSR committee. Having a CSR committee also triggered better non-financial performance when considering the four scores and the four countries independently (except for the economic scores in Spain). These results have great implications for practitioners, reflecting the importance of promoting these tools in an organization to enhance non-financial performance and sustainability.

scholarly journals The Impact of CSR and Financial Distress on Financial Performance—Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies of the Manufacturing Industry

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 6799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Wu ◽  
Zhen Shao ◽  
Changhui Yang ◽  
Tao Ding ◽  
Wan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Manufacturing Industry ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Chinese Listed Companies ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact

This paper explores the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial distress on corporate financial performance (CFP) in Chinese listed companies of the manufacturing industry. Covering a total of 1445 manufacturing observations from 2013 to 2018 by matching the China Stock Market & Accounting Research Database (CSMAR) and Ranking CSR Ratings (RKS) database and regression models, we find that CSR has a significant positive impact on CFP, and the relationship is more pronounced for firms that are more stable. Further, the win-win relationship of CSR and CFP is also stronger in state-owned enterprises (SOEs). These empirical results suggest that enterprises should actively embrace CSR in response to the call of the country. At the same time, corporate stability should be increased to enhance the role of CSR in promoting CFP. We provide a quantitative analysis of the CSR, CFP, and financial distress of listed firms, and help to alleviate managers’ concern of CSR fulfillment and risk control.

scholarly journals Stakeholder ratings and corporate financial performance: Socially responsible for what?

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 94-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Venanzi
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Stakeholder Management ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Corporate Financial Performance ◽  
Socially Responsible ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Key Stakeholders ◽  
Corporate Social

This paper aims at empirically supporting, in a cross-country and cross-industry analysis, the instrumental role of stakeholder management by adopting a disaggregated approach to the corporate social performance measurement. By using a sample of 250 European industrial listed firms, from 10 European countries, in the period 2001-2003, we find the following evidence: i) the firm is not socially responsible towards all stakeholders, but invests more in key-stakeholders, those who are (perceived as) more influential on its business and have a more valuable impact on its financial performance; ii) a null or weak significance of the relationship between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) in the whole sample hides highly significant opposite relationships in two separate sub-samples (i.e. firms with positive and negative relationship, respectively): the sign of the CSP-CFP link cannot be expected to be univocal, since the marginal reward-cost equilibrium of social investment is firm-specific.

scholarly journals Financial Performance Gaps and Corporate Social Responsibility

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 3438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinming Deng ◽  
Xianyi Long
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Behavioral Theory ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
The Past ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact

Based on the behavioral theory of firm and prospect theory, we investigate how corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities will respond to underperformance in past and in future. Using samples of Chinese listed firms from 2011 to 2016, this paper found that CSR increases with the distance by which financial performance in the last year falls below goals and decreases with the distance by which expected financial performance will fall below targets. In addition, the future underperformance will weaken the effect of the past underperformance on CSR. Besides, the value of financial performance in the last year will weaken the impact of underperformance in the last year on CSR and strengthen the impact of underperformance in the next year on CSR. The findings suggest that future studies should take both value of financial performance and performance gaps into consideration to have a better understanding of organizational decisions and behaviors.

scholarly journals Evidence in Asian Food Industry: Intellectual Capital, Corporate Financial Performance, and Corporate Social Responsibility

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Hung Tsai ◽  
Eugene Burgos Mutuc
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Food Industry ◽  
Corporate Financial Performance ◽  
Business Practices ◽  
Sustainable Business ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Corporate Social

Intellectual capital (IC) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) provide a strong link between the enterprise and stakeholders. These strategic approaches are responsible in value formation for better financial performance. This study investigates the mediating effects of corporate financial performance on the relationship between IC components (ICs) and CSR of firms from the food industry in Asia. We analyzed 308 firm-year observations of 44 listed firms from 2011 to 2017. The results of this study provided mixed findings regarding the effects of ICs and CSR. In addition, results vary from the disaggregated effects of each IC component on environmental, social, and governance pillars. The results also indicate that the combination of accounting and market-based estimates of financial performance was found to be significant mediating factor to explain the phenomenon which varies per ICs and dimensions of CSR. Lastly, the implications for sustainable business practices and investments in knowledge-based resources in the food industry are elaborated.

scholarly journals Entrepreneurship, Corporate Social Responsibilities, and Innovation Impact on Banks’ Financial Performance

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianhua Wei ◽  
Rong Xiong ◽  
Marria Hassan ◽  
Alaa Mohamd Shoukry ◽  
Fares Fawzi Aldeek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Social Responsibilities ◽  
Independent Variables ◽  
Ordinary Least Square Regression ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibilities

The basic aim of this research was to check the impact of innovation, corporate social responsibilities (CSR), and entrepreneurship on the monetary performance of banks in five different countries: Qatar, Pakistan, China, the United States (US), and France. This research was conducted to measure the relationship of these factors and innovative workforce activities. The secondary data were collected from websites of twenty five banks in different countries, including Islamic and conventional banks. Different econometric analyses, such as descriptive statistical analysis, correlation coefficient test for measuring the interaction, and ordinary least square regression analysis for determining the impact of dependent and independent variables, were carried out. In the present study, entrepreneurship, CSR, and innovation were taken as independent variables. Board size, frequency of assemblies, and self-employed with large shareholders were included as sub-parts of entrepreneurship. On the other hand, the financial performance of banks was taken as the dependent variable. Return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE) were considered parts of economic performance. The overall conclusions drawn in this study showed that there was a significant relationship between all the studied variables. The research provided useful insights into the long-debated question regarding the relevance of entrepreneurship and CSR.

scholarly journals EFFECTS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ON COMPANY VALUES: CASE OF BANKS LISTED ON THE INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Larey Wahongan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Independent Variables ◽  
Dependent Variables ◽  
Independent Variable ◽  
Corporate Social

This study aims to analyze the effect of financial performance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the value of the company at banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2013-2017. The data used are secondary data, namely financial statements published on the Indonesia Stock Exchange's website during the period 2013-2017 which contain information about the ratio of banking financial performance (NPL, LDR, ROA, and CAR), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and Value Companies with Tobin's Q method. This study consists of dependent variables and independent variables. The dependent variable is the value of the company, while the independent variable is financial performance and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).

scholarly journals Corporate governance and financial performance for engaging socially and environmentally responsible practices

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Fiandrino ◽  
Alain Devalle ◽  
Valter Cantino
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Stakeholder Relationships ◽  
The Social ◽  
Social And Environmental Performance ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Corporate Social

PurposeThis paper aims to reconcile the conflicting understanding on the nexus between corporate governance (CG), corporate financial performance (CFP) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) by investigating how companies engage with CSR practices.Design/methodology/approachThe study carries out a multivariate linear regression analysis on a sample of 361 listed companies from five countries in Europe: France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK.FindingsCG mechanisms and CFP have an impact on CSR because they affect social and environmental practices strongly and significantly. Furthermore, the findings describe the capacity of CSR to influence both the CG structure and the CFP.Research limitations/implicationsThe present research limits the analysis on the social and environmental performance of companies that communicate their commitment to stakeholders without distinguishing between “greenwashing” companies that implement CSR to improve corporate reputation and those companies that pursue effective societal benefits, taking care of stakeholder relationships.Practical implicationsThe CSR approach can drive the CG structure and improve CFP if managers perceive the implementation of sustainable practices as an integrated process rather than a mere outcome.Originality/valueThis paper seeks to disentangle the nexus between CG, CFP and CSR, not yet precisely defined by scholars in the context of five countries in Europe.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document